Serological IgG avidity test for ocular toxoplasmosis

Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immunoglobulin (Ig) G avidity of serological toxoplasmosis testing in patients with ocular inflammation and to determine the clinical manifestations of ocular toxoplasmosis. Methods A retrospective review of all patients presenting with ocular inflammation to the Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia between 2005 and 2009 was undertaken. Visual acuity, clinical manifestations at presentation, toxoplasmosis antibody testing, and treatment records were analyzed. Results A total of 130 patients with ocular inflammation were reviewed retrospectively. The patients had a mean age of 38.41 (standard deviation 19.24, range 6–83) years. Seventy-one patients (54.6%) were found to be seropositive, of whom five (3.8%) were both IgG and IgM positive (suggestive of recently acquired ocular toxoplasmosis) while one (0.8%) showed IgG avidity ≤40% (suggestive of recently acquired ocular toxoplasmosis) and 65 patients (50.0%) showed IgG avidity >40% (suggestive of reactivation of toxoplasmosis infection). Chorioretinal scarring as an ocular manifestation was significantly more common in patients with seropositive toxoplasmosis (P = 0.036). Eighteen patients (13.8%) were diagnosed as having recent and/or active ocular toxoplasmosis based on clinical manifestations and serological testing. Conclusion Ocular toxoplasmosis is a clinical diagnosis, but specific toxoplasmosis antibody testing helps to support the diagnosis and to differentiate between reactivation of infection and recently acquired ocular toxoplasmosis.

[1]  V. Nissapatorn,et al.  Seroprevalence and sources of toxoplasmosis among Orang Asli (indigenous) communities in Peninsular Malaysia. , 2011, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[2]  M. Nassaji,et al.  Clinical feature and treatment outcome of active ocular toxoplasmosis in immunocompetent patients. , 2010 .

[3]  F. Yu,et al.  Intraocular inflammation associated with ocular toxoplasmosis: relationships at initial examination. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  J. Kalil,et al.  Molecular markers of susceptibility to ocular toxoplasmosis, host and guest behaving badly , 2008, Clinical ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Garweg Determinants of immunodiagnostic success in human ocular toxoplasmosis , 2005, Parasite immunology.

[6]  A. Rothova,et al.  Ocular toxoplasmosis: clinical features and prognosis of 154 patients. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[7]  J. Rouland,et al.  Ocular toxoplasmosis after the fifth decade. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  H. Carol,et al.  Avidity analysis of the human immune response to a chitin binding protein of Toxoplasma gondii. , 2001, International journal for parasitology.

[9]  S. Parmley,et al.  Use of the polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Paul Immunoglobulin G Avidity in Diagnosis of Toxoplasmic Lymphadenopathy and Ocular Toxoplasmosis , 1999, Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology.

[11]  M. Marsetio,et al.  Visual impairment and blindness in ocular toxoplasmosis cases. , 1991, The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health.

[12]  J. Lavat,et al.  Ocular Toxoplasmosis , 2011 .