Correlation between Solar Flare Productivity and Photospheric Magnetic Field Properties II. Magnetic Gradient and Magnetic Shear

Abstract With 1353 vector magnetograms observed at Huairou Solar Observing Station (HSOS), a statistical analysis is made on the relationship among solar flares, magnetic gradient, and magnetic shear. The results suggest that flare productivity has positive correlations with the gradient and the shear, which can be well fitted by the Boltzmann sigmoidal function. In the vicinity of neutral lines, high gradient and strong shear are roughly coincident in time but barely in position. In addition, flare productivity is more sensitive to the length of neutral lines with strong gradient and shear (Lgs) than independently with strong gradient (Lg) or strong shear (Ls), which means that Lgs can be a better parameter for solar flare forecasting models. Finally, an algorithm to evaluate projection effects on the statistical results is proposed.

[1]  Hongqi Zhang Electric Current and Magnetic Shear in Solar Active Regions , 2001 .

[2]  D. Rabin,et al.  Measurement and interpretation of magnetic shear in solar active regions , 1986 .

[3]  Haimin Wang,et al.  Active-Region Monitoring and Flare Forecasting – I. Data Processing and First Results , 2002 .

[4]  Liyun Zhang,et al.  Correlation Between Solar Flare Productivity and Photospheric Magnetic Field Properties , 2006 .

[5]  Haimin Wang,et al.  The Relationship between Magnetic Gradient and Magnetic Shear in Five Super Active Regions Producing Great Flares , 2006 .

[6]  G. A. Gary,et al.  Correlation of the Coronal Mass Ejection Productivity of Solar Active Regions with Measures of Their Global Nonpotentiality from Vector Magnetograms: Baseline Results , 2002 .

[7]  Huaning Wang,et al.  Flares and the Magnetic Nonpotentiality , 1996 .

[8]  M. Hagyard Observed nonpotential magnetic fields and the inferred flow of electric currents at a location of repeated flaring , 1987 .

[9]  Valentyna Abramenko,et al.  Relationship between Magnetic Power Spectrum and Flare Productivity in Solar Active Regions , 2005 .

[10]  G. Barnes,et al.  Photospheric Magnetic Field Properties of Flaring versus Flare-quiet Active Regions. II. Discriminant Analysis , 2003 .

[11]  K. D. Leka,et al.  Photospheric Magnetic Field Properties of Flaring versus Flare-quiet Active Regions. I. Data, General Approach, and Sample Results , 2003 .

[12]  H. Zirin,et al.  Vector magnetic field changes associated with X-class flares , 1994 .

[13]  L. November Solar Polarimetry: Proceedings of the National Solar Observatory/ Sacramento Peak Summer Workshop 11th Held in Sunspot, New Mexico on 27-31 August 1990 , 1991 .

[14]  G. A. Gary,et al.  A measure from line‐of‐sight magnetograms for prediction of coronal mass ejections , 2003 .

[15]  G. Allen Gary,et al.  Transformation of vector magnetograms and the problems associated with the effects of perspective and the azimuthal ambiguity , 1990 .

[16]  Edward A. West,et al.  A quantitative study relating observed shear in photospheric magnetic fields to repeated flaring , 1984 .

[17]  Yihua Yan,et al.  Topology of Magnetic Field and Coronal Heating in Solar Active Regions , 2001 .

[18]  H. Zirin,et al.  Delta spots and great flares , 1982 .

[19]  D. Falconer A prospective method for predicting coronal mass ejections from vector magnetograms , 2001 .

[20]  Harold Zirin,et al.  The Astrophysics of the Sun , 1988 .