On Grievance Protocols for Conflict Resolution in Open Multi-Agent Systems

This paper presents the specification of an agent-based framework for conflict resolution into Open Multi-agent Systems by means of grievance protocols. In this framework, any grievance process primarily involves negotiation (with or without mediation) and arbitration or a combination of both. In this way, the result of a conflict resolution can be an agreement among the conflicting parties by which they voluntary settle the conflict, or a decision from the arbitrator (a neutral third party) which is final, and binding on both conflicting parties. The framework is designed in such a way that multiple agreement mechanisms may be available at any given time, to be activated and adjusted on demand (on-line) by participating agents. The framework is also generic enough so that new protocols may be easily added. The objective is to have a generic electronic institution that may be tailored to specific needs and grafted into other electronic institutions.

[1]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Towards a Platform for Online Mediation , 2009, LDSS@ICAIL.

[2]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Follow the Leader: Profiling Agents in an Opinion Formation Model of Dynamic Confidence and Individual Mind-Sets , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.

[3]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Specifying norm-governed computational societies , 2009, TOCL.

[5]  D. Khadraoui,et al.  Arbitration of Autonomous Multimedia Objects with a Multi-Agent System , 2006, 2006 2nd International Conference on Information & Communication Technologies.

[6]  François Bodart,et al.  ARBAS: A Formal Language to Support Argumentation in Network-Based Organizations , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Electronic institutions development environment , 2008, AAMAS.

[8]  Peter McBurney,et al.  Locutions for Argumentation in Agent Interaction Protocols , 2004, AC.

[9]  Jaewook Lee,et al.  Conflict resolution in multi-agent based Intelligent Environments , 2010 .

[10]  Carles Sierra,et al.  Trust and honour in information-based agency , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[11]  Peter Z. Revesz,et al.  On the Semantics of Arbitration , 1997, Int. J. Algebra Comput..

[12]  C. List,et al.  Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result , 2002, Economics and Philosophy.

[13]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Voting in Multi-Agent Systems , 2006, Comput. J..

[14]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages , 2000 .

[15]  Habib Abdulrab,et al.  Coordination, Cooperation and Conflict Resolution in Multi-Agent Systems , 2007 .

[16]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[17]  Alan Tidwell,et al.  Conflict Resolved?: A Critical Assessment of Conflict Resolution , 1998 .

[18]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Normative Multi-Agent Systems , 2013, Normative Multi-Agent Systems.

[19]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  On the Logic of Normative Systems , 2007, IJCAI.

[20]  Thomas Schultz,et al.  Online Dispute Resolution: The State of the Art and the Issues , 2006 .

[21]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Automated Negotiation and Decision Making in Multiagent Environments , 2001, EASSS.

[22]  Marc Pauly,et al.  Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation , 2006, J. Philos. Log..

[23]  Jeremy V. Pitt,et al.  Alternative Dispute Resolution in Virtual Organizations , 2008, ESAW.

[24]  S. Daniels,et al.  Argument and alternative dispute resolution systems , 1995 .

[25]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  Specifying and Enforcing Norms in Artificial Institutions , 2008, EUMAS.

[26]  Marco Schaerf,et al.  Arbitration: A Commutative Operator for Belief Revision , 1995, WOCFAI.

[27]  Michael Luck,et al.  Towards a Formalisation of Electronic Contracting Environments , 2009, COIN@AAMAS&AAAI.