A Classification Method to Distinguish Cell-Specific Responses Elicited by Current Pulses in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Cells

The suprathreshold electrophysiological responses of pyramidal cells have been grouped into large classes such as bursting and spiking. However, it is not known whether, within a class, response variability ranges uniformly across all cells or whether each cell has a unique and consistent profile that can be differentiated. A major difficulty when comparing suprathreshold responses is that slight variations in spike timing in otherwise very similar traces render traditional metrics ineffective. To address these issues, we developed a novel distance measure based on fiducial points to quantify the similarity among traces with trains of action potentials and applied it together with classification techniques to a set of in vitro patch clamp recordings from CA1 pyramidal cells. We tested if responses to repeated current stimulation of a given cell would cluster together yet remain distinct from those of other cells. We found that depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses elicited responses in each cell that clustered and were systematically distinguishable from responses in other cells. The fiducial-point distance measure was more effective than other methods based on spike times and voltage-gradient phase planes. Depolarizing traces were more reliably differentiated than hyperpolarizing traces, and combining both scores was even more effective. These results suggest that each CA1 pyramidal cell has unique properties that can be detected and quantified with methods discussed here. This uniqueness may be due to slight variations in morphology or membrane channel densities and kinetics, or to large, coordinated variations in these elements. Ascertaining the actual sources and their degree of variability is important when constructing network models of neural function to ensure that key mechanisms are robust in the face of variations within these ranges. The analytical tools presented here can assist in constructing detailed cell models to match experimental records to elucidate the sources of electrophysiological variability in neurons.

[1]  E. Marder,et al.  Variable channel expression in identified single and electrically coupled neurons in different animals , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Jonathan D Victor,et al.  Spike train metrics , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[3]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Funding for malaria genome sequencing , 1997, Nature.

[4]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Effects of variability in anatomical reconstruction techniques on models of synaptic integration by dendrites: a comparison of three internet archives , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[5]  M. Tennigkeit,et al.  Properties of the fast sodium channels in pyramidal neurones isolated from the CA1 and CA3 areas of the hippocampus of postnatal rats , 1990, Pflügers Archiv.

[6]  Noam Peled,et al.  Constraining compartmental models using multiple voltage recordings and genetic algorithms. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Complex Parameter Landscape for a Complex Neuron Model , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  L. Grover,et al.  Evidence for postsynaptic induction and expression of NMDA receptor independent LTP. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Nicoll,et al.  Control of the repetitive discharge of rat CA 1 pyramidal neurones in vitro. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Storm Potassium currents in hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1990, Progress in brain research.

[11]  G. N. Lance,et al.  Computer Programs for Hierarchical Polythetic Classification ("Similarity Analyses") , 1966, Comput. J..

[12]  B. Bean,et al.  Robustness of Burst Firing in Dissociated Purkinje Neurons with Acute or Long-Term Reductions in Sodium Conductance , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Amaral,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the dendritic organization of pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  N T Carnevale,et al.  Comparative electrotonic analysis of three classes of rat hippocampal neurons. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  E. Marder,et al.  Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  Lyle J. Borg-Graham,et al.  Interpretations of Data and Mechanisms for Hippocampal Pyramidal Cell Models , 1999 .

[17]  T. Freund,et al.  Total number and distribution of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells , 2001, Neuroscience.

[18]  L. Grover,et al.  Evidence for involvement of group II/III metabotropic glutamate receptors in NMDA receptor-independent long-term potentiation in area CA1 of rat hippocampus. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Ascoli,et al.  Quantitative morphometry of hippocampal pyramidal cells: Differences between anatomical classes and reconstructing laboratories , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  Martin Alexander Youngson,et al.  Linear Functional Analysis , 2000 .

[21]  D. Johnston,et al.  Characterization of single voltage‐gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels in apical dendrites of rat CA1 pyramidal neurons. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Erik De Schutter,et al.  Introduction to Equation Solving and Parameter Fitting , 2000 .

[23]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Metric-space analysis of spike trains: theory, algorithms and application , 1998, q-bio/0309031.

[24]  W Rall,et al.  Matching dendritic neuron models to experimental data. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[25]  D. Johnston,et al.  K+ channel regulation of signal propagation in dendrites of hippocampal pyramidal neurons , 1997, Nature.

[26]  Susan L. Wearne,et al.  The role of action potential shape and parameter constraints in optimization of compartment models , 2006, Neurocomputing.

[27]  J. Storm,et al.  Action potential repolarization and a fast after‐hyperpolarization in rat hippocampal pyramidal cells. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  James M. Bower,et al.  A Comparative Survey of Automated Parameter-Search Methods for Compartmental Neural Models , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[29]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[30]  D A Turner,et al.  Dendritic properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat: Intracellular staining in vivo and in vitro , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  Arnold R. Kriegstein,et al.  Whole cell recording from neurons in slices of reptilian and mammalian cerebral cortex , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  J. Magee Dendritic Hyperpolarization-Activated Currents Modify the Integrative Properties of Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[34]  William R Holmes,et al.  Analysis and comparison of morphological reconstructions of hippocampal field CA1 pyramidal cells , 2005, Hippocampus.

[35]  P W Gage,et al.  The sodium current underlying action potentials in guinea pig hippocampal CA1 neurons , 1988, The Journal of general physiology.

[36]  G. Stuart,et al.  Direct measurement of specific membrane capacitance in neurons. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[37]  N. Keren,et al.  Experimentally guided modelling of dendritic excitability in rat neocortical pyramidal neurones , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  E. Marder,et al.  Similar network activity from disparate circuit parameters , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.