What is the benefit of ceilometers for aerosol remote sensing? An answer from EARLINET

Abstract. With the establishment of ceilometer networks by national weather services, a discussion commenced to which extent these simple backscatter lidars can be used for aerosol research. Though primarily designed for the detection of clouds it was shown that at least observations of the vertical structure of the boundary layer might be possible. However, an assessment of the potential of ceilometers for the quantitative retrieval of aerosol properties is still missing. In this paper we discuss different retrieval methods to derive the aerosol backscatter coefficient βp, with special focus on the calibration of the ceilometers. Different options based on forward and backward integration methods are compared with respect to their accuracy and applicability. It is shown that advanced lidar systems such as those being operated in the framework of the European Aerosol Research Lidar Network (EARLINET) are excellent tools for the calibration, and thus βp retrievals based on forward integration can readily be implemented and used for real-time applications. Furthermore, we discuss uncertainties introduced by incomplete overlap, the unknown lidar ratio, and water vapor absorption. The latter is relevant for the very large number of ceilometers operating in the spectral range around λ = 905–910 nm. The accuracy of the retrieved βp mainly depends on the accuracy of the calibration and the long-term stability of the ceilometer. Under favorable conditions, a relative error of βp on the order of 10% seems feasible. In the case of water vapor absorption, corrections assuming a realistic water vapor distribution and laser spectrum are indispensable; otherwise errors on the order of 20% could occur. From case studies it is shown that ceilometers can be used for the reliable detection of elevated aerosol layers below 5 km, and can contribute to the validation of chemistry transport models, e.g., the height of the boundary layer. However, the exploitation of ceilometer measurements is still in its infancy, so more studies are urgently needed to consolidate the present state of knowledge, which is based on a limited number of case studies.

[1]  Benjamin M. Herman,et al.  Determination of aerosol height distributions by lidar , 1972 .

[2]  D. James.  Continuous monitoring. , 1979, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[3]  C. Platt,et al.  Remote Sounding of High Clouds: I. Calculation of Visible and Infrared Optical Properties from Lidar and Radiometer Measurements , 1979 .

[4]  J. Klett.  Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns. , 1981, Applied optics.

[5]  G. Mellor,et al.  Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems , 1982 .

[6]  E. Eloranta,et al.  High spectral resolution lidar to measure optical scattering properties of atmospheric aerosols. 1: theory and instrumentation. , 1983, Applied optics.

[7]  S. H. Melfi,et al.  Lidar observations of vertically organized convection in the planetary boundary layer over the ocean , 1985 .

[8]  Y. Sasano,et al.  Error caused by using a constant extinction/backscattering ratio in the lidar solution. , 1985, Applied optics.

[9]  W. Eberhard,et al.  Cloud signals from lidar and rotating beam ceilometer compared with pilot ceiling , 1986 .

[10]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km) , 1986 .

[11]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Independent measurement of extinction and backscatter profiles in cirrus clouds by using a combined Raman elastic-backscatter lidar. , 1992, Applied optics.

[12]  Allan I. Carswell,et al.  Automated method for lidar determination of cloud-base height and vertical extent. , 1992, Applied optics.

[13]  Y Sasano,et al.  Tropospheric aerosol optical properties derived from lidar, sun photometer, and optical particle counter measurements. , 1994, Applied optics.

[14]  C. Flamant,et al.  Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the paris area. , 1999, Applied optics.

[15]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Microphysical particle parameters from extinction and backscatter lidar data by inversion with regularization: theory. , 1999, Applied optics.

[16]  Using Horizontal and Slant Lidar Measurements to Obtain Calibrated Aerosol Scattering Coefficients from a Coastal Lidar in Hawaii , 2000 .

[17]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  An Objective Method for Deriving Atmospheric Structure from Airborne Lidar Observations , 2000 .

[18]  Zaviša I. Janić.  Nonsingular implementation of the Mellor-Yamada level 2.5 scheme in the NCEP Meso model , 2001 .

[19]  G. Kallos,et al.  A model for prediction of desert dust cycle in the atmosphere , 2001 .

[20]  E. O'connor,et al.  A Technique for Autocalibration of Cloud Lidar , 2004 .

[21]  Georg A. Grell,et al.  Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model , 2005 .

[22]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Libradtran Software Package for Radiative Transfer Calculations – Description and Examples of Use , 2022 .

[23]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes , 2005 .

[24]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[25]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A New Vertical Diffusion Package with an Explicit Treatment of Entrainment Processes , 2006 .

[26]  Christoph Münkel.  Mixing height determination with lidar ceilometers results from Helsinki Testbed , 2007 .

[27]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Stable Boundary Layer Mixing in a Vertical Diffusion Scheme , 2007 .

[28]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Multiple atmospheric layering and mixing-layer height in the Inn valley observed by remote sensing , 2007 .

[29]  Jacques Pelon,et al.  STRAT: An Automated Algorithm to Retrieve the Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere from Single-Channel Lidar Data , 2007 .

[30]  Krzysztof M. Markowicz,et al.  Ceilometer Retrieval of the Boundary Layer Vertical Aerosol Extinction Structure , 2008 .

[31]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Continuous monitoring of the boundary-layer top with lidar , 2008 .

[32]  L. Mona,et al.  One year of CNR-IMAA multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements in coincidence with CALIPSO overpasses: Level 1 products comparison , 2009 .

[33]  Timo Nousiainen,et al.  On the Quantitative Low-Level Aerosol Measurements Using Ceilometer-Type Lidar , 2009 .

[34]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET correlative measurements for CALIPSO: First intercomparison results , 2010 .

[35]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ceilometer lidar comparison: backscatter coefficient retrieval and signal-to-noise ratio determination , 2010 .

[36]  Giovanni Martucci,et al.  Detection of Cloud-Base Height Using Jenoptik CHM15K and Vaisala CL31 Ceilometers , 2010 .

[37]  U. Schumann,et al.  Airborne observations of the Eyjafjalla volcano ash cloud over Europe during air space closure in April and May 2010 , 2010 .

[38]  W. Steinbrecht,et al.  The Eyjafjallajökull eruption in April 2010 – detection of volcanic plume using in-situ measurements, ozone sondes and lidar-ceilometer profiles , 2010 .

[39]  Vincenzo Cuomo,et al.  CIAO: the CNR-IMAA advanced observatory for atmospheric research , 2010 .

[40]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Volcanic ash from Iceland over Munich: mass concentration retrieved from ground-based remote sensing measurements , 2010 .

[41]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  The May/June 2008 Saharan dust event over Munich: Intensive aerosol parameters from lidar measurements , 2011 .

[42]  Giuseppe D'Amico,et al.  Examination of possible synergy between lidar and ceilometer for the monitoring of atmospheric aerosols , 2011, Remote Sensing.

[43]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Characterization of Saharan dust, marine aerosols and mixtures of biomass-burning aerosols and dust by means of multi-wavelength depolarization and Raman lidar measurements during SAMUM 2 , 2011 .

[44]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Measurement and simulation of the 16/17 April 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash layer dispersion in the northern Alpine region , 2011 .

[45]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Modelling lidar-relevant optical properties of complex mineral dust aerosols , 2011 .

[46]  A. Holtslag,et al.  Evaluation of the Diurnal Cycle in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over Land as Represented by a Variety of Single-Column Models: The Second GABLS Experiment , 2011 .

[47]  B. Weinzierl,et al.  Aerosol classification by airborne high spectral resolution lidar observations , 2012 .

[48]  A. Berjón,et al.  A new method for nocturnal aerosol measurements with a lunar photometer prototype , 2012 .

[49]  A. Stohl,et al.  High levels of particulate matter in Iceland due to direct ash emissions by the Eyjafjallajökull eruption and resuspension of deposited ash , 2012 .

[50]  A. Stohl,et al.  Integration of measurements and model simulations to characterize Eyjafjallajökull volcanic aerosols over south-eastern Italy , 2012 .

[51]  Matthias Wiegner,et al.  Aerosol profiling with the Jenoptik ceilometer CHM15kx , 2012 .

[52]  Michael A. P. McAuliffe,et al.  Four-dimensional distribution of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic cloud over Europe observed by EARLINET , 2012 .

[53]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Characterization of the Eyjafjallajökull ash-plume: Potential of lidar remote sensing , 2012 .

[54]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network , 2014 .

[55]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Representative wavelengths absorption parameterization applied to satellite channels and spectral bands , 2014 .