Minimal retentive sets in tournaments

Tournament solutions, i.e., functions that associate with each complete and asymmetric relation on a set of alternatives a nonempty subset of the alternatives, play an important role in the mathematical social sciences at large. For any given tournament solution $$S$$S, there is another tournament solution  which returns the union of all inclusion-minimal sets that satisfy $$S$$S-retentiveness, a natural stability criterion with respect to $$S$$S. Schwartz’s tournament equilibrium set ($${ TEQ }$$TEQ) is defined recursively as . In this article, we study under which circumstances a number of important and desirable properties are inherited from $$S$$S to . We thus obtain a hierarchy of attractive and efficiently computable tournament solutions that “approximate” $${ TEQ }$$TEQ, which itself is computationally intractable. We further prove a weaker version of a recently disproved conjecture surrounding $${ TEQ }$$TEQ, which establishes —a refinement of the top cycle—as an interesting new tournament solution.

[1]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  Banks winners in tournaments are difficult to recognize , 2003, Soc. Choice Welf..

[2]  Thomas Schwartz Cyclic tournaments and cooperative majority voting: A solution , 1990 .

[3]  H. Moulin Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making , 1988 .

[4]  Jennifer Ryan,et al.  Tournament games and positive tournaments , 1995, J. Graph Theory.

[5]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  More on the tournament equilibrium set , 1993 .

[6]  J. Weibull,et al.  Strategy subsets closed under rational behavior , 1991 .

[7]  Thierry Marchant,et al.  Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria: Stepping Stones for the Analyst , 2006 .

[8]  Paul D. Seymour,et al.  A counterexample to a conjecture of Schwartz , 2013, Soc. Choice Welf..

[9]  Noga Alon,et al.  Ranking Tournaments , 2006, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[10]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  Computing the minimal covering set , 2008, Math. Soc. Sci..

[11]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  Computational Aspects of Covering in Dominance Graphs , 2007, AAAI.

[12]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  Composition-consistent tournament solutions and social choice functions , 1996 .

[13]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Set-rationalizable choice and self-stability , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  Jean-François Laslier,et al.  Tournament Solutions And Majority Voting , 1997 .

[15]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Minimal stable sets in tournaments , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.

[16]  Bhaskar Dutta,et al.  On the tournament equilibrium set , 1990 .

[17]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Computing Slater Rankings Using Similarities among Candidates , 2006, AAAI.

[18]  H. Moulin Choosing from a tournament , 1986 .

[19]  Paul E. Dunne,et al.  Computational properties of argument systems satisfying graph-theoretic constraints , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Nicolas Houy,et al.  Still more on the Tournament Equilibrium Set , 2009, Soc. Choice Welf..

[21]  M. Breton,et al.  The Bipartisan Set of a Tournament Game , 1993 .

[22]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  The Computational Complexity of Choice Sets , 2009, Math. Log. Q..

[23]  Felix Brandt,et al.  Characterization of dominance relations in finite coalitional games , 2010 .

[24]  John Duggan,et al.  Dutta's Minimal Covering Set and Shapley's Saddles , 1996 .

[25]  I. Good A note on condorcet sets , 1971 .

[26]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making , 1986 .

[27]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[28]  Felix A. Fischer,et al.  A computational analysis of the tournament equilibrium set , 2008, Soc. Choice Welf..