Efficient procurement of public air services: lessons learned from European transport authorities' perspectives?

This paper aims to derive lessons and best practices from the different European experiences by viewing issues from a public transport authority perspective. The heart of this paper is a survey of European air service procurement authorities. We discuss the authoritiesr perspectives on why they fund a PSO including likely future funding trends and investigate various aspects of the procedures connected with the PSO process (transparency of the subsidy amount, risk sharing with the operator, incentives for operator, vetting of the operator and use of specialist advice). This paper also explores various aspects of the obligations authorities impose upon routes and operator (e.g. maximum fare, social discounts, ticketing, timetabling, size of aircraft, air cargo requirements). A particular interest of the paper is connected with the authoritiesr interest in marketing the PSO as well as with the authoritiesr perspective on promoting and enjoying sufficient competition in their PSO tendering exercises. The derived lessons from the EU experience are discussed in the light of their use in assisting policy makers in promoting and drafting their own regional air transport programs (e.g., Russia) or in further developing existing schemes such as the Remote Air Services Subsidy Scheme in Australia.

[1]  Xavier Fageda,et al.  Public Service Obligations in the Airline Market: Lessons from the Spanish Case , 2009 .

[2]  Dieter Bös,et al.  Property rights and the nature of the firm journal of political economy: Oliver Hart and John Moore, Journal of political economy (1990), no. 6, 1119-1158 , 1991 .

[3]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[4]  D. Hensher,et al.  The Importance of Completeness and Clarity in Air Transport Contracts in Remote Regions in Europe and Australia , 2013 .

[5]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Air Accessibility In Northern Canada: Prospects And Lessons For Remoter Communities , 2011 .

[6]  Rico Merkert,et al.  Determinants of European PSO airline efficiency – Evidence from a semi-parametric approach , 2013 .

[7]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Tony H. Grubesic,et al.  An analysis of essential air service structure and performance , 2012 .

[9]  H Gordijn,et al.  Aviation as public transport: which regions are underserved? , 2006 .

[10]  Romano Pagliari,et al.  A comparative analysis of the application and use of public service obligations in air transport within the EU , 2004 .

[11]  Nigel Halpern,et al.  Air transport service provision and management strategies to improve the economic benefits for remote regions , 2012 .

[12]  James Nolan,et al.  Small Market Air Service and Regional Policy , 2005 .

[13]  Stéphane Saussier Transaction costs and contractual incompleteness: the case of Électricité de France , 2000 .

[14]  Patrick Petit,et al.  Introducing regulation in the measurement of efficiency, with an application to the Canadian air carriers industry , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Transacting under a performance-based contract: The role of negotiation and competitive tendering , 2007 .

[16]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Aisling J. Reynolds-Feighan,et al.  European air transport public service obligations: a periodic review , 1995 .