Monovision Achieved with Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery

Presbyopia refers to the decrease in accommodative capacity that accompanies aging. By definition, presbyopia occurs when an individual’s accommodative power is no longer able to allow for sustained and comfortable near-vision work. The appearance of presbyopia is not defined by age or precise accommodative reserve, as people’s near-vision requirements differ. However, most people in their early forties begin to notice difficulties with performance of near-vision tasks. The presbyopic population in the United States is expected to double every 5 years until the year 2010. Monovision constitutes one means of addressing the problem of presbyopia. In monovision, one eye is optically corrected for distance vision and the other eye for near vision. The near-vision eye may be placed in focus at a reading distance (33 cm) or at an intermediate distance (for example, at 50 cm for computer use). The monovision approach has been successfully applied to presbyopic contact lens wearers. For contact lens wearers, single-vision contact lenses correct one eye for distance and undercorrect the other eye by 1 to 2 D. Refractive surgical procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) serve to correct myopia by flattening the corneal curvature. The number of refractive surgery cases performed on a yearly basis continues to increase exponentially. Many refractive surgery patients are in the presbyopic or prepresbyopic age group, and these patients often experience difficulties with near vision

[1]  A B Nesburn,et al.  Bilateral photorefractive keratectomy with intentional unilateral undercorrection in an aircraft pilot , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  M. Kapadia,et al.  Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  J. Koetting WORD RECOGNITION AS A FUNCTION OF LOCUS IN THE FOUR LATERAL VISUAL FIELDS; THE IOTA PHENOMENON* , 1970, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  K J Bowman,et al.  Peripheral Visual Acuity with Monovision and Other Contact Lens Corrections for Presbyopia , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Binocular vs. Monocular Task Performance , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[6]  M M Hom Monovision and LASIK. , 1999, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[7]  P Erickson,et al.  Patterns of Binocular Suppression and Accommodation in Monovision , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[8]  C. Trevarthen,et al.  Two mechanisms of vision in primates , 1968, Psychologische Forschung.

[9]  D A Heath,et al.  Suppression Behavior Analyzed as a Function of Monovision Addition Power , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[10]  S Coren,et al.  PATTERNS OF OCULAR DOMINANCE* , 1973, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  M Collins,et al.  Distance Visual Acuity and Monovision , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  D. Rose Monocular versus Binocular Contrast Thresholds for Movement and Pattern , 1978, Perception.

[13]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[14]  H A Stein The management of presbyopia with contact lenses: a review. , 1990, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[15]  R. D. Toit,et al.  Visual and Nonvisual Variables Implicated in Monovision Wear , 1998, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Ocular Dominance and the Interocular Suppression of Blur in Monovision , 1987, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[17]  J. Garbus,et al.  Multifocal corneal topographic changes with excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. , 1992, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  Shahina Pardhan,et al.  The effect of monocular defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[19]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Vision and Task Performance with Monovision and Diffractive Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  P Erickson,et al.  Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular fusional ranges. , 1991, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[21]  R A Koetting,et al.  STEREOPSIS IN PRESBYOPES FITTED WITH SINGLE VISION CONTACT LENSES* , 1970, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  Koetting Ra,et al.  Stereopsis in presbyopes fitted with single vision contact lenses. , 1970 .

[23]  R. Gundel,et al.  Manual of Contact Lens Prescribing and Fitting , 1997 .

[24]  S. Jain,et al.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery. , 1996, Survey of ophthalmology.

[25]  Robert Fox,et al.  The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation , 1973 .

[26]  G N JESSEN Bifocal contact lenses. , 1960, The British journal of physiological optics.

[27]  P Erickson,et al.  Visual Function with Presbyopic Contact Lens Correction , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[28]  M G Harris,et al.  Clinicolegal considerations of monovision. , 1988, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[29]  F. Roy Refractive surgery. , 1995, The Journal of the Arkansas Medical Society.