BEHAVIORAL SAMPLING METHODS FOR CETACEANS: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE

Behavioral scientists have developed methods for sampling behavior in order to reduce observational biases and to facilitate comparisons between studies. A review of 74 cetacean behavioral field studies published from 1989 to 1995 in Marine Mammal Science and The Canadian Journal of Zoology suggests that cetacean researchers have not made optimal use of available methodology. The survey revealed that a large proportion of studies did not use reliable sampling methods. Ad libitum sampling was used most often (59%). When anecdotal studies were excluded, 45% of 53 behavioral studies used ad libitum as the predominant method. Other sampling methods were continuous, onezero, incident, point, sequence, or scan sampling. Recommendations for sampling methods are made, depending on identifiability of animals, group sizes, dive durations, and change in group membership.

[1]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Investigating structure and temporal scale in social organizations using identified individuals , 1995 .

[2]  Robin I. M. Dunbar.  Some Aspects of Research Design and Their Implications in the Observational Study of Behaviour , 1976 .

[3]  P Tyack.  An optical telemetry device to identify which dolphin produces a sound. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P. Hammond,et al.  Individual recognition of cetaceans: use of photo-identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters. Incorporating the Proceedings of the symposium and workshop on individual recognition and the estimation of cetacean population parameters , 1990 .

[5]  J. Altmann,et al.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. , 1974, Behaviour.

[6]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[7]  Aerial behaviour in sperm whales , 1990 .

[8]  P L Tyack,et al.  A datalogger to identify vocalizing dolphins. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. Payne,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF BOWHEAD WHALES, BALAENA MYSTICETUS, SUMMERING IN THE BEAUFORT SEA: A DESCRIPTION! , 1985 .

[10]  A. Samuels,et al.  A quantitative assessment of dominance relations among bottlenose dolphins , 1997 .

[11]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  Behavioral sampling in the field: Comparison of individual and group sampling methods , 1992, American journal of primatology.

[12]  Stephen Tyler,et al.  Time-sampling: A matter of convention , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  How to avoid seven deadly sins in the study of behavior , 1997 .

[14]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Patterns of Visually Observable Behaviour and Vocalizations in Groups of Female Sperm Whales , 1991 .

[15]  L. Freitag,et al.  Passive acoustic localization of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin using whistles and echolocation clicks. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Janet Mann Barbara.  BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT IN WILD BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN NEWBORNS (TURSIOPS SP.) , 1999 .

[17]  H. Whitehead.  Analysing animal social structure , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Christopher W. Clark.  A real‐time direction finding device for determining the bearing to the underwater sounds of Southern Right Whales, Eubalaena australis , 1980 .

[19]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[20]  Christopher W. Clark,et al.  SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, HABITAT UTILIZATION, AND SOCIAL INTERACTIONS OF HUMPBACK WHALES, MEGAPTERA NOVAEANGLIAE, OFF HAWAI'I, DETERMINED USING ACOUSTIC AND VISUAL TECHNIQUES , 1995 .

[21]  J. Mann,et al.  Time sampling: a methodological critique. , 1991, Child development.

[22]  S. Shane.  12 – Behavior and Ecology of the Bottlenose Dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida , 1990 .

[23]  C. Hutt,et al.  Direct observation and measurement of behavior , 1970 .

[24]  David Rogosa,et al.  Statistical Models for Behavioral Observations , 1991 .