Acquisition of spatial knowledge for routes

Abstract An important issue in the study of spatial knowledge has been the distinction between configurational and route knowledge. Route knowledge is characterized by the knowledge of sequential locations without the knowledge of general interrelationships. In contrast, configurational knowledge is characterized by the ability to generalize beyond learned routes and locate objects within a general frame of reference. These two types of knowledge are contrasted in a learning experiment, in which subjects acquire spatial information either from a map or a slide presentation. Furthermore, the structure of their spatial knowledge is derived from free-recall data using the ordered tree clustering algorithm. The results show, first, that subjects in the map condition acquired more accurate configurational knowledge. Second, we found that route knowledge can be acquired either through route presentation or map presentation. Third, there are individual differences within the slide group, such that some subjects were able to acquire configurational knowledge. And fourth, ordered trees are able to account for some of these differences, and thus identify the degree of configurational knowledge acquired by the slide subjects.

[1]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the "ordered tree technique." , 1986 .

[2]  Nicholas S. Ialongo,et al.  The relationship between spatial ability and environmental knowledge , 1986 .

[3]  S. Doherty,et al.  A conceptual model and empirical analysis of children's acquisition of spatial knowledge , 1985 .

[4]  I Moar,et al.  Memory for Routes , 1982, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[6]  E. Lindberg,et al.  Cognitive Mapping of Large-Scale Environments , 1984 .

[7]  G. Allen,et al.  The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge. , 1978 .

[8]  Michael E. Hunt,et al.  Environmental Learning without Being There , 1984 .

[9]  Edward H. Cornell,et al.  Children's Acquisition of a Route via Different Media , 1984 .

[10]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[11]  T. McNamara,et al.  Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Juan Ignacio Aragonés,et al.  Structure of urban cognitive maps , 1985 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[14]  J. Reitman,et al.  Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Judith S Reitman,et al.  Organization revealed by recall orders and confirmed by pauses , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  G. Allen A developmental perspective on the effects of "subdividing" macrospatial experience. , 1981 .

[17]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  T. McNamara Mental representations of spatial relations , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  J. Baird,et al.  Semantic and spatial factors in environmental memory , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[21]  G. Allen,et al.  Effects of the cognitive organization of route knowledge on judgments of macrospatial distance , 1985, Memory & cognition.