Transcranial magnetic stimulation after pure motor stroke

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in demonstrating the possible subclinical impairment of the corticospinal pathway after recovery, in patients with a clinical history of pure motor stroke (PMS) due to a single lacunar infarct detectable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS MEPs were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle of 20 healthy subjects and 40 patients, 6 months or more after PMS onset. Patients were evaluated clinically by means of the NIH stroke scale, the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and the Barthel Index. The patients with full hand strength recovery and the normal controls were also tested by means of the 9-hole peg test. RESULTS Motor threshold (MT), MEP amplitude and central motor conduction time (CMCT) of the affected side were significantly different from those of the normal side and of the control subjects. MT, MEP amplitude and CMCT obtained after stimulation of the affected hemisphere were significantly correlated with the MRC scale values of the affected hand. Eighty-six percent of patients with persistent hand strength deficit showed MEP abnormalities. In 21 patients with complete clinical recovery, a significant increase in MT and decrease in MEP amplitude on the affected side were observed. CONCLUSIONS After PMS, neurophysiological changes may persist despite complete clinical recovery. TMS represents a sensitive tool that enables to demonstrate objectively the clinical and subclinical impairment of the corticospinal pathway.

[1]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[2]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  M. Escudero,et al.  Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. , 1998, Stroke.

[5]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the `affected' and `unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke , 1998, Brain Research.

[6]  C. Fisher.  Lacunar strokes and infarcts , 1982, Neurology.

[7]  P M Rossini,et al.  Interhemispheric differences of hand muscle representation in human motor cortex , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  James N. Davis,et al.  Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. , 1989, Archives of neurology.

[9]  P M Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: prognostic value for hand motor recovery. , 1999, Stroke.

[11]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? , 1988, International disability studies.

[12]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Neurophysiological follow-up of motor cortical output in stroke patients , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Gary W Thickbroom,et al.  Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 1 December 2000. , 2001, Brain Research.

[15]  P. Rossini,et al.  'Excitability changes of muscular responses to magnetic brain stimulation in patients with central motor disorders. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  T. P. Anderson,et al.  Mossman's A problem-oriented approach to stroke rehabilitation , 1982 .

[17]  K. Stephan,et al.  Transcranial stimulation of motor cortex in upper motor neurone syndrome: its relation to the motor deficit. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  E Favale,et al.  Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in lacunar syndromes. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  A. Berardelli,et al.  Electrical and magnetic transcranial stimulation in patients with corticospinal damage due to stroke or motor neurone disease. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 1. Natural history of central motor conduction. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[22]  C Ertekin,et al.  Prognostic Value of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Acute Stroke , 1994, Stroke.