Characterization and classification of modes in acoustic emission based on dispersion features and energy distribution analysis

Acoustic Emission (AE) techniques are used for the structural health monitoring of civil, aeronautic and aerospace structures. Recently, these structures are made of composite materials due to their advantages over traditional materials, but this increases the interpretation complexity of the failure modes present. Therefore, in order to make AE a trustworthy technique, reliable source location and damage mechanism characterization must be accomplished. On that account, this work proposes a novel approach based on a chirplet atomic decomposition, time-frequency energy distribution and dispersion analysis, where the failure-emitted signals are separated from extraneous noise and the detected modes are analyzed according to their dispersive behaviour and angular dependence characteristics. Dispersion relations are obtained by the use of a higher order plate theory on a non-absorbing anisotropic plate model, and then used in conjunction with the previous methodologies for mode identification and localization. The proposed methodology and model are validated, and the capability of the method to overcome practical issues encountered in AE testing is demonstrated experimentally.

[1]  R. D. Mindlin,et al.  Influence of rotary inertia and shear on flexural motions of isotropic, elastic plates , 1951 .

[2]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Of Poles and Zeros: Fundamentals of Digital Seismology , 2013 .

[3]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  K. Holford.  Acoustic Emission–Basic Principles and Future Directions , 2000 .

[5]  Nathalie Godin,et al.  Clustering of acoustic emission signals collected during tensile tests on unidirectional glass/polyester composite using supervised and unsupervised classifiers , 2004 .

[6]  Laurence J. Jacobs,et al.  Localization of a ``Synthetic'' Acoustic Emission Source on the Surface of a Fatigue Specimen , 2001 .

[7]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Delta T source location for acoustic emission , 2007 .

[8]  Christian Boller,et al.  Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures , 2003 .

[9]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Guided-wave signal processing using chirplet matching pursuits and mode correlation for structural health monitoring , 2006, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  Claus-Peter Fritzen,et al.  Computational aspects of guided wave based damage localization algorithms in flat anisotropic structures , 2012 .

[11]  Bent F. Sørensen,et al.  Detecting and identifying damage in sandwich polymer composite by using acoustic emission , 2006 .

[12]  Tribikram Kundu,et al.  Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation : Engineering and Biological Material Characterization , 2003 .

[13]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Matching pursuits with time-frequency dictionaries , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  M. Castaings,et al.  Lamb and SH waves generated and detected by air-coupled ultrasonic transducers in composite material plates , 2001 .

[15]  M. Gorman,et al.  Source location in thin plates using cross-correlation , 1991 .

[16]  C. Sun,et al.  A higher order theory for extensional motion of laminated composites , 1973 .

[17]  James Hensman,et al.  Locating acoustic emission sources in complex structures using Gaussian processes , 2008 .

[18]  Ronald R. Coifman,et al.  Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Frank Scherbaum.  Of poles and zeros , 1996 .

[20]  Jochen H Kurz,et al.  Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete. , 2005, Ultrasonics.