Willingness to Share Data From Wearable Health and Activity Trackers: Analysis of the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey Data

Background Sharing data from wearable health and activity trackers (wearables) with others may improve the health and behavioral outcomes of wearable users by generating social support and improving their ability to manage their health. Investigating individual factors that influence US adults’ willingness to share wearable data with different types of individuals may provide insights about the population subgroups that are most or least likely to benefit from wearable interventions. Specifically, it is necessary to identify digital health behaviors potentially associated with willingness to share wearable data given that the use of and engagement with various technologies may broadly influence web-based health information–sharing behaviors. Objective This study aims to identify sociodemographic, health, and digital health behavior correlates of US adults’ willingness to share wearable data with health care providers and family or friends. Methods Data for the analytic sample (N=1300) were obtained from the 2019 Health Information National Trends Survey of the National Cancer Institute. Digital health behavior measures included frequency of wearable device use, use of smartphones or tablets to help communicate with providers, use of social networking sites to share health information, and participation in a web-based health community. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of weighted data examined the associations between digital health behaviors and willingness to share wearable device data, controlling for sociodemographics and health-related characteristics. Results Most US adults reported willingness to share wearable data with providers (81.86%) and with family or friends (69.51%). Those who reported higher health self-efficacy (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95% CI 1.11-3.51), higher level of trust in providers as a source of health information (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.12-3.49), and higher level of physical activity (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.21-3.31) had greater odds of willingness to share data with providers. In addition, those with a higher frequency of wearable use (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.35-3.43) and those who reported use of smartphones or tablets to help communicate with providers (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09-3.63) had greater odds of willingness to share data with providers. Only higher level of physical activity was associated with greater odds of willingness to share wearable data with family or friends (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.84). Sociodemographic factors were not significantly associated with willingness to share wearable data. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that, among US adult wearable users, behavior-related factors, rather than sociodemographic characteristics, are key drivers of willingness to share health information obtained from wearables with others. Moreover, behavioral correlates of willingness to share wearable data are unique to the type of recipient (ie, providers vs family or friends). Future studies could use these findings to inform the development of interventions that aim to improve the use of patient-generated data from wearable devices in health care settings.

[1]  Daoyan Jin,et al.  Self-tracking behaviour in physical activity: a systematic review of drivers and outcomes of fitness tracking , 2020, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Kea Turner,et al.  Sharing patient-generated data with healthcare providers: findings from a 2019 national survey , 2020, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Young-Rock Hong,et al.  Electronic wearable device and physical activity among US adults: An analysis of 2019 HINTS data , 2020, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Ranganathan Chandrasekaran,et al.  Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Linda C. Li,et al.  Effects of a 12-Week Multifaceted Wearable-Based Program for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2020, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[6]  K. Wright New Technologies and Health Communication , 2020 .

[7]  R. Moser,et al.  Characterizing the US Population by Patterns of Mobile Health Use for Health and Behavioral Tracking: Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey Data , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  The Handbook of Applied Communication Research , 2020 .

[9]  Chi Young Oh,et al.  Interrelationships Between Patients’ Data Tracking Practices, Data Sharing Practices, and Health Literacy: Onsite Survey Study , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Nicci C. L. Gafinowitz,et al.  Improving patient engagement by fostering the sharing of activity tracker data with providers: a qualitative study. , 2020, Health information and libraries journal.

[11]  Rural-Urban Continuum Codes 2013 , 2020, Definitions.

[12]  Health Information National Trends Survey , 2020, Definitions.

[13]  S. Carlson,et al.  Physical Activity Surveillance Using Wearable Activity Monitors: Are US Adults Willing to Share Their Data? , 2020, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[14]  W. Riley,et al.  National Institutes of Health Support of Digital Health Behavior Research , 2019, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[15]  Yue Liao,et al.  The Future of Wearable Technologies and Remote Monitoring in Health Care. , 2019, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[16]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[17]  R. Moser,et al.  Data Resource Profile: The National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Andrew D. Williams,et al.  Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[19]  J. A. Griffin,et al.  Commentary: Pediatric Digital Health Supported by the National Institutes of Health. , 2018, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[20]  Andrew C. High,et al.  Count Your Calories and Share Them: Health Benefits of Sharing mHealth Information on Social Networking Sites , 2019, Health communication.

[21]  Jessilyn Dunn,et al.  Wearables and the medical revolution. , 2018, Personalized medicine.

[22]  Stephen A. Rains Coping with Illness Digitally , 2018 .

[23]  Scott W Cheatham,et al.  The efficacy of wearable activity tracking technology as part of a weight loss program: a systematic review. , 2017, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[24]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[25]  Yaguang Zhu,et al.  “Social Networkout”: Connecting Social Features of Wearable Fitness Trackers with Physical Exercise , 2017, Journal of health communication.

[26]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[27]  K. Watson,et al.  National physical activity surveillance: Users of wearable activity monitors as a potential data source , 2016, Preventive medicine reports.

[28]  G. Jung,et al.  Locally placed nanoscale gold islands film within a TiO2 photoanode for enhanced plasmon light absorption in dye sensitized solar cells , 2016, Nano Convergence.

[29]  Lisa Gualtieri,et al.  Can a Free Wearable Activity Tracker Change Behavior? The Impact of Trackers on Adults in a Physician-Led Wellness Group , 2016, JMIR research protocols.

[30]  Garth Fuller,et al.  A Large-Scale Initiative Inviting Patients to Share Personal Fitness Tracker Data with Their Providers: Initial Results , 2016, PloS one.

[31]  Kisha I Coa,et al.  Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3 , 2016, Translational behavioral medicine.

[32]  John Warren,et al.  Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Yaguang Zhu,et al.  What is Your Fitness Tracker Communicating?: Exploring Messages and Effects of Wearable Fitness Devices , 2016 .

[34]  Katrina J Serrano,et al.  Willingness to Exchange Health Information via Mobile Devices: Findings From a Population-Based Survey , 2016, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[35]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Sharing Patient-Generated Data in Clinical Practices: An Interview Study , 2016, AMIA.

[36]  Danielle Arigo,et al.  Promoting physical activity among women using wearable technology and online social connectivity: a feasibility study , 2015 .

[37]  D. Kasprzyk,et al.  Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. , 2008 .

[38]  Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Health , 2008, The Oklahoma nurse.