Characterization of the shallow aquifers by high‐resolution seismic data

We present the results obtained by processing high-resolution seismic data acquired along the spring line located in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia plain (NE of Italy), in order to characterize an important multilayered aquifer. This system is made of an unconfined layer and, at increasing depths, of several confined aquifers of variable thickness and hydraulic permeability, mainly consisting of sand and gravel material. The main targets of this study are two shallow aquifers located at about 30 m and 200 m depth respectively. The seismic method is not frequently used for this type of study but in this case, it was considered a good tool due to the depth of the targets. The detailed velocity model we obtained reveals lateral velocity variations with a maximum value of 600 m/s. The higher velocities could be associated to layers that are confined aquifers; in fact, sand and gravel are characterized by higher seismic velocity compared to clay layers. Pre-stack depth migration using this velocity model gives a clear picture of the multilayered aquifer, highlighting lateral changes of seismic amplitude along the main reflectors. Finally, vertical variations of Poisson's ratio, computed by amplitude versus offset analysis, provide useful information about the petrophysical properties, such as the fluid content of the subsoil and lithologic changes.

[1]  Olivier Coussy,et al.  Acoustics of Porous Media , 1988 .

[2]  Depth characterization of shallow aquifers with seismic reflection, Part I—The failure of NMO velocity analysis and quantitative error prediction , 2002 .

[3]  Manika Prasad,et al.  ATTENUATION MECHANISMS IN SANDS : LABORATORY VERSUS THEORETICAL (BIOT) DATA , 1992 .

[4]  Paul G. Richards,et al.  Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods , 1980 .

[5]  H. A. van der Vorst,et al.  Numerical solution of large, sparse linear algebraic systems arising from tomographic problems , 1987 .

[6]  U. Tinivella,et al.  Gas hydrate and free gas distribution from inversion of seismic data on the South Shetland margin (Antarctica) , 2002 .

[7]  Richard Verm,et al.  Lithology, color-coded seismic sections; the calibration of AVO crossplotting to rock properties , 1995 .

[8]  W. P. Clement,et al.  Seismic reflection and ground-penetrating radar imaging of a shallow aquifer , 1998 .

[9]  G. Böhm,et al.  3D adaptive tomography using Delaunay triangles and Voronoi polygons , 2000 .

[10]  J. Schön,et al.  Physical Properties of Rocks: Fundamentals and Principles of Petrophysics , 1996 .

[11]  Öz Yilmaz,et al.  Seismic data processing , 1987 .

[12]  G. Böhm,et al.  Tomographic imaging by reflected and refracted arrivals at the North Sea , 1999 .

[13]  Robert B. Smith,et al.  Seismic traveltime inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure , 1992 .

[14]  G. H. F. Gardner,et al.  FORMATION VELOCITY AND DENSITY—THE DIAGNOSTIC BASICS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS , 1974 .

[15]  Gualtiero Böhm,et al.  In quest of the grid , 1999 .

[16]  Amos Nur,et al.  High-resolution shallow-seismic experiments in sand, Part I: Water table, fluid flow, and saturation , 1998 .

[17]  Don W. Steeples,et al.  Seismic Reflection Methods Applied to Engineering, Environmental, and Groundwater Problems , 1999 .

[18]  Robert R. Stewart,et al.  Exploration seismic tomography : fundamentals , 1991 .

[19]  J. Hunter,et al.  ``Optimum offset'' seismic reflection mapping of shallow aquifers near Bangkok, Thailand , 1998 .

[20]  U. Tinivella,et al.  Geofluid evidence from analysis of deep crustal seismic data (Southern Tuscany, Italy) , 2005 .