Calculations of the accretion and evolution of giant planets: The effects of solid cores

The evolution of the giant planets is calculated under the general hypothesis that the solid cores formed first, by accretion of small particles, and that these cores later gravitationally attracted their gaseous envelopes from the solar nebula. The evolution passes through the following phases. (1) Planetesimals accrete to form a core of rocky and icy material. (2) When the core mass has grown to a few tenths of an Earth mass, a gaseous envelope in hydrostatic equilibrium begins to form around the core. (3) The core and envelope continue to grow until the “critical” core mass is reached, beyond which point the envelope increases in mass much more rapidly than the core. (4) The envelope mass increases quickly to its present value and prodices a relatively high luminosity, derived from gravitational contraction. (5) Accretion of both core and envelope terminates, and the planet contracts and cools to its present state on a time scale of 5 × 109 years. Evolutionary calculations of phases (2) through (5) are presented, based on solutions of the time-dependent stellar structure equations in spherical symmetry. The physical considerations that determine the critical core mass are discussed; its value is found to depend strongly on the core accretion rate but only weakly on surface boundary conditions. Evolutionary tracks up to the present state are presented for objects of Uranus and Saturn mass.

[1]  Jack J. Lissauer,et al.  Timescales for planetary accretion and the structure of the protoplanetary disk , 1986 .

[2]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Consistency tests of cosmogonic theories from models of Uranus and Neptune , 1984 .

[3]  R. Reynolds,et al.  What have we learned from modeling giant planet interiors , 1985 .

[4]  A. Harris The Formation of the Outer Planets , 1978 .

[5]  H. R. Johnson,et al.  Effect of molecules and grains on Rosseland mean opacities , 1983 .

[6]  Richard J. Greenberg,et al.  From icy planetesimals to outer planets and comets , 1984 .

[7]  C. Hayashi,et al.  Accumulation of planetesimals in the solar nebula , 1983 .

[8]  Julio A. Fernández,et al.  Some dynamical aspects of the accretion of Uranus and Neptune: The exchange of orbital angular momentum with planetesimals , 1984 .

[9]  P. Bodenheimer,et al.  On the evolution of convective accretion disk models of the primordial solar nebula , 1982 .

[10]  W. Hubbard,et al.  Computation of Jupiter interior models from gravitational inversion theory , 1983 .

[11]  H. Graboske,et al.  Thermodynamics of dense hydrogen--helium fluids , 1975 .

[12]  Kazuhiro Nakazawa,et al.  Formation of the solar system. , 1985 .

[13]  D. Stevenson Formation of the giant planets , 1982 .

[14]  D. Stevenson Interiors of the Giant Planets , 1982 .

[15]  J. Pollack,et al.  Estimates of the bolometric albedos and radiation balance of Uranus and Neptune , 1986 .

[16]  J. Burns,et al.  Gas drag in primordial circumplanetary envelopes: A mechanism for satellite capture , 1979 .

[17]  J. Pollack Origin and History of the Outer Planets: Theoretical Models and Observational Constraints , 1984 .

[18]  P. Bodenheimer,et al.  Calculations of the evolution of the giant planets , 1980 .

[19]  D. Alexander Low-Temperature Rosseland Opacity Tables , 1975 .

[20]  D. Lin,et al.  Tidal torques on accretion discs in binary systems with extreme mass ratios. , 1979 .

[21]  George W. Wetherill,et al.  The range of validity of the two-body approximation in models of terrestrial planet accumulation: II. Gravitational cross sections and runaway accretion , 1985 .

[22]  G. Wetherill Formation of the Terrestrial Planets , 1980 .

[23]  A. Cameron,et al.  Hydrodynamic instability of the solar nebula in the presence of a planetary core , 1974 .

[24]  R. Smoluchowski Internal Structure and Energy Emission of Jupiter , 1967, Nature.

[25]  P. Bodenheimer,et al.  Planetesimal dissolution in the envelopes of the forming, giant planets , 1986 .

[26]  D. Stevenson Cosmochemistry and structure of the giant planets and their satellites , 1985 .

[27]  G. Wetherill,et al.  The range of validity of the two-body approximation in models of terrestrial planet accumulation: I. Gravitational perturbations , 1984 .

[28]  J. Pollack,et al.  A calculation of the Rosseland mean opacity of dust grains in primordial solar system nebulae , 1985 .

[29]  D. Lin,et al.  The global evolution of the primordial solar nebula , 1986 .

[30]  C. Hayashi,et al.  Instability of a Gaseous Envelope Surrounding a Planetary Core and Formation of Giant Planets , 1978 .

[31]  J. Pollack,et al.  The effect of dense cores on the structure and evolution of Jupiter and Saturn , 1980 .

[32]  J. N. Stewart,et al.  ROSSELAND OPACITY TABLES FOR POPULATION I COMPOSITIONS. , 1970 .

[33]  A. G. W. Cameron,et al.  Evolution of giant gaseous protoplanets embedded in the primitive solar nebula , 1982 .

[34]  E. Salpeter On convection and gravitational layering in Jupiter and in stars of low mass. , 1973 .

[35]  H. Mizuno,et al.  Formation of the Giant Planets , 1980 .

[36]  A. G. W. Cameron,et al.  Physics of the primitive solar accretion disk , 1978 .