Low‐Level Marine Tropical Clouds in Six CMIP6 Models Are Too Few, Too Bright but Also Too Compact and Too Homogeneous

Several studies have shown that most climate models underestimate cloud cover and overestimate cloud reflectivity, particularly for the tropical low‐level clouds. Here, we analyze the characteristics of low‐level tropical marine clouds simulated by six climate models, which provided COSP output within the CMIP6 project. CALIPSO lidar observations and PARASOL mono‐directional reflectance are used for model evaluation. It is found that the “too few, too bright” bias is still present for these models. The reflectance is particularly overestimated when cloud cover is low. Models do not simulate any optically thin clouds. They fail to reproduce the increasing cloud optical depth with increasing lower tropospheric stability as observed. These results suggest that most models do not sufficiently account for the effect of the small‐scale spatial heterogeneity in cloud properties or the variety of cloud types at the grid scale that is observed.

[1]  B. Stevens,et al.  Optically thin clouds in the trades , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[2]  W. Gong,et al.  Satellite retrieval of cloud base height and geometric thickness of low-level cloud based on CALIPSO , 2021 .

[3]  S. Klein,et al.  Observed Sensitivity of Low-Cloud Radiative Effects to Meteorological Perturbations over the Global Oceans , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[4]  Peter J. Minnett,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of MERRA-2 and ERA-Interim Sea Surface Temperature, Air Temperature, and Humidity Profiles over the Atlantic Ocean Using AEROSE Measurements , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[5]  S. Bony,et al.  Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[6]  H. Douville,et al.  The CNRM Global Atmosphere Model ARPEGE‐Climat 6.3: Description and Evaluation , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[7]  F. Chéruy,et al.  LMDZ6A: The Atmospheric Component of the IPSL Climate Model With Improved and Better Tuned Physics , 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[8]  M. Lebsock,et al.  Climate Impact of Cloud Water Inhomogeneity through Microphysical Processes in a Global Climate Model , 2020, Journal of Climate.

[9]  S. Bony,et al.  Sugar, Gravel, Fish, and Flowers: Dependence of Mesoscale Patterns of Trade‐Wind Clouds on Environmental Conditions , 2020, Geophysical research letters.

[10]  K. Taylor,et al.  Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[11]  S. Bony,et al.  Sugar, gravel, fish and flowers: Mesoscale cloud patterns in the trade winds , 2019, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[12]  F. Hourdin,et al.  Unified Parameterization of Convective Boundary Layer Transport and Clouds With the Thermal Plume Model , 2019, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[13]  S. Buehler,et al.  The Dependence of Shallow Cumulus Macrophysical Properties on Large‐Scale Meteorology as Observed in ASTER Imagery , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[14]  S. Yukimoto,et al.  Significant improvement of cloud representation in the global climate model MRI-ESM2 , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[15]  Ad Stoffelen,et al.  Characterizing ERA-Interim and ERA5 surface wind biases using ASCAT , 2019, Ocean Science.

[16]  Mohamed Zerroukat,et al.  The Met Office Unified Model Global Atmosphere 7.0/7.1 and JULES Global Land 7.0 configurations , 2011, Geoscientific Model Development.

[17]  J. Dufresne,et al.  Accounting for Vertical Subgrid‐Scale Heterogeneity in Low‐Level Cloud Fraction Parameterizations , 2018, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.

[18]  Dai Yamazaki,et al.  Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[19]  R. Wood,et al.  Deeper, Precipitating PBLs Associated With Optically Thin Veil Clouds in the Sc‐Cu Transition , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[20]  C. Bretherton,et al.  Ultraclean Layers and Optically Thin Clouds in the Stratocumulus-to-Cumulus Transition. Part I: Observations , 2018 .

[21]  J. R. Wilson,et al.  The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 1. Simulation Characteristics With Prescribed SSTs , 2018 .

[22]  J. R. Wilson,et al.  The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 2. Model Description, Sensitivity Studies, and Tuning Strategies , 2018 .

[23]  F. Martin Ralph,et al.  An Intercomparison between Reanalysis and Dropsonde Observations of the Total Water Vapor Transport in Individual Atmospheric Rivers , 2017 .

[24]  L. Oreopoulos,et al.  New insights about cloud vertical structure from CloudSat and CALIPSO observations , 2017, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[25]  Andrew Gettelman,et al.  The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning , 2017 .

[26]  S. Bony,et al.  Shallowness of tropical low clouds as a predictor of climate models’ response to warming , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[27]  H. Chepfer,et al.  Use of A-train satellite observations (CALIPSO–PARASOL) to evaluate tropical cloud properties in the LMDZ5 GCM , 2016, Climate Dynamics.

[28]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[29]  I. Sandu,et al.  Observed and modeled patterns of covariability between low‐level cloudiness and the structure of the trade‐wind layer , 2015 .

[30]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  Assessing the performance of GPS radio occultation measurements in retrieving tropospheric humidity in cloudiness: A comparison study with radiosondes, ERA‐Interim, and AIRS data sets , 2014 .

[31]  Heini Wernli,et al.  Warm Conveyor Belts in the ERA-Interim Dataset (1979–2010). Part II: Moisture Origin and Relevance for Precipitation , 2014 .

[32]  S. Bony,et al.  On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[33]  D. Winker,et al.  On the nature and extent of optically thin marine low clouds , 2012 .

[34]  S. Bony,et al.  The ‘too few, too bright’ tropical low‐cloud problem in CMIP5 models , 2012 .

[35]  H. Chepfer,et al.  A process oriented characterization of tropical oceanic clouds for climate model evaluation, based on a statistical analysis of daytime A-train observations , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[36]  S. Klein,et al.  Are climate model simulations of clouds improving? An evaluation using the ISCCP simulator , 2012 .

[37]  D. Klocke,et al.  Tuning the climate of a global model , 2012 .

[38]  A. Pier Siebesma,et al.  Overlap statistics of cumuliform boundary-layer cloud fields in large-eddy simulations , 2011 .

[39]  John M. Haynes,et al.  COSP: Satellite simulation software for model assessment , 2011 .

[40]  F. Bréon,et al.  Remote sensing of aerosols by using polarized, directional and spectral measurements within the A-Train: the PARASOL mission , 2011 .

[41]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[42]  S. Bony,et al.  The GCM‐Oriented CALIPSO Cloud Product (CALIPSO‐GOCCP) , 2010 .

[43]  S. Bony,et al.  Use of CALIPSO lidar observations to evaluate the cloudiness simulated by a climate model , 2008 .

[44]  Olivier Hagolle,et al.  PARASOL in-flight calibration and performance. , 2007, Applied optics.

[45]  C. Bretherton,et al.  On the Relationship between Stratiform Low Cloud Cover and Lower-Tropospheric Stability , 2006 .

[46]  I. Musat,et al.  On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles , 2006 .

[47]  S. Bony,et al.  Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models , 2005 .

[48]  S. Bony,et al.  Comparing clouds and their seasonal variations in 10 atmospheric general circulation models with satellite measurements , 2005 .

[49]  R. Hogan,et al.  Parameterizing the Difference in Cloud Fraction Defined by Area and by Volume as Observed with Radar and Lidar , 2005 .

[50]  S. Bony,et al.  Combining ERBE and ISCCP data to assess clouds in the Hadley Centre, ECMWF and LMD atmospheric climate models , 2001 .

[51]  Anthony D. Del Genio,et al.  A Prognostic Cloud Water Parameterization for Global Climate Models , 1996 .

[52]  Annick Bricaud,et al.  The POLDER mission: instrument characteristics and scientific objectives , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[53]  S. Klein,et al.  The Seasonal Cycle of Low Stratiform Clouds , 1993 .

[54]  E. Roeckner,et al.  Cloud optical depth feedbacks and climate modelling , 1987, Nature.

[55]  J. Slingo.  A cloud parametrization scheme derived from GATE data for use with a numerical model , 1980 .