Determination of the biomechanical effect of an interspinous process device on implanted and adjacent lumbar spinal segments using a hybrid testing protocol: a finite-element study.

OBJECT The authors evaluated the biomechanical effects of an interspinous process (ISP) device on kinematics and load sharing at the implanted and adjacent segments. METHODS A 3D finite-element (FE) model of the lumbar spine (L1-5) was developed and validated through comparison with published in vitro study data. Specifically, validation was achieved by a flexible (load-control) approach in 3 main planes under a pure moment of 10 Nm and a compressive follower load of 400 N. The ISP device was inserted between the L-3 and L-4 processes. Intact and implanted cases were simulated using the hybrid protocol in all motion directions. The resultant motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure after implantation were investigated at the index and adjacent levels. In addition, stress at the bone-implant interface was predicted. RESULTS The hybrid approach, shown to be appropriate for adjacent-level investigations, predicted that the ISP device would decrease the range of motion, facet load, and intradiscal pressure at the index level relative to the corresponding values for the intact spine in extension. Specifically, the intradiscal pressure induced after implantation at adjacent segments increased by 39.7% and by 6.6% at L2-3 and L4-5, respectively. Similarly, facet loads at adjacent segments after implantation increased up to 60% relative to the loads in the intact case. Further, the stress at the bone-implant interface increased significantly. The influence of the ISP device on load sharing parameters in motion directions other than extension was negligible. CONCLUSIONS Although ISP devices apply a distraction force on the processes and prevent further extension of the index segment, their implantation may cause changes in biomechanical parameters such as facet load, intradiscal pressure, and range of motion at adjacent levels in extension.

[1]  Y. Iwasaki,et al.  An Interspinous Process Distractor (X STOP) for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: Preliminary Experiences in 10 Consecutive Cases , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[2]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Movements of the Whole Lumbar Spine and Lumbosacral Joint , 1989, Spine.

[3]  Douglas Wardlaw,et al.  Effects of X-Stop Device on Sagittal Lumbar Spine Kinematics in Spinal Stenosis , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[4]  L Claes,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments: an in vitro experiment. , 2003, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  Edward Teng,et al.  Hybrid Testing of Lumbar CHARITÉ Discs Versus Fusions , 2007, Spine.

[6]  A. Rohlmann,et al.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[7]  V. Goel,et al.  Biomechanics of Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Systems , 2013, Advances in orthopedics.

[8]  Erol Gercek,et al.  Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[9]  Dimitriy Kondrashov,et al.  Interspinous Process Decompression With the X-STOP Device for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study , 2006, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[10]  Ling Li,et al.  Association between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinous process fracture after interspinous process spacer surgery. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[11]  H. Wilke,et al.  Biomechanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[12]  I. Lazoglu,et al.  Application of an asymmetric finite element model of the C2-T1 cervical spine for evaluating the role of soft tissues in stability. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  E. Ebramzadeh,et al.  Comparison of Three Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Devices , 2011, Spine.

[14]  S. Yerby,et al.  The Effect of an Interspinous Process Implant on Facet Loading During Extension , 2005, Spine.

[15]  Erosion of the spinous process: a potential cause of interspinous process spacer failure. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[16]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Charité Artificial Disc on the Implanted and Adjacent Spinal Segments Mechanics Using a Hybrid Testing Protocol , 2005, Spine.

[17]  Ali Kiapour,et al.  Effect of Graded Facetectomy on Biomechanics of Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization System , 2012, Spine.

[18]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The Cortical Shell Architecture of Human Cervical Vertebral Bodies , 2001, Spine.

[19]  Meic H. Schmidt,et al.  Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[20]  Manohar M Panjabi,et al.  Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  New Interspinous Implant Evaluation Using an In Vitro Biomechanical Study Combined With a Finite-Element Analysis , 2007, Spine.

[22]  S. Majumdar,et al.  The Treatment Mechanism of an Interspinous Process Implant for Lumbar Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication , 2005, Spine.

[23]  K J Mathias,et al.  Spinous Process Strength , 2000, Spine.

[24]  A. Vaccaro,et al.  Interspinous Process Devices in the Lumbar Spine , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[25]  S. Yerby,et al.  The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on Intervertebral Disc Pressures , 2003, Spine.

[26]  S. Yerby,et al.  The Effects of an Interspinous Implant on the Kinematics of the Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in the Lumbar Spine , 2003, Spine.

[27]  J. Zucherman,et al.  A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating the X STOP Interspinous Process Decompression System for the Treatment of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication: Two-Year Follow-Up Results , 2005, Spine.

[28]  Thomas R. Oxland,et al.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[29]  Dimitriy Kondrashov,et al.  Scoliosis and interspinous decompression with the X-STOP: prospective minimum 1-year outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2010, The spine journal.