Revealing Uncertainties in Land Change Modeling Using Probabilities

Land change models are frequently used to analyze current land change processes and possible future developments. However, the outcome of such models is accompanied by uncertainties that have to be taken into account in order to address their reliability for science and decision-making. While a range of approaches exist that quantify the disagreement of land change maps, the quantification of uncertainty remains a major challenge. The aim of this article is therefore to reveal uncertainties in land change modeling by developing two measures: quantity uncertainty and allocation uncertainty. We choose a Bayesian Belief Network modeling approach for deforestation in Brazil to develop and apply the two measures to the resulting probability surface. Quantity uncertainty describes the uncertainty about the correct number of cells in a land change map assigned to different land change categories and allocation uncertainty expresses the uncertainty about the correct spatial placement of a cell in the land change map. Thus, uncertainty can be quantified even in those cases where no reference data exist. Informing about uncertainty in probabilistic outcomes may be an important asset when land change projections are being used in science and decision-making and moreover, they may also be further evaluated for other spatial applications.

[1]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  Spatial analysis of remote sensing image classification accuracy , 2012 .

[2]  S. Bergen,et al.  Predictors of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon , 2002 .

[3]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Uncertainty in the difference between maps of future land change scenarios , 2009 .

[4]  Anet Potgieter,et al.  Applying Bayesian modelling to assess climate change effects on biofuel production , 2009 .

[5]  Paulo Cesar G. da Costa,et al.  Envisioning Uncertainty in Geospatial Information , 2007, BMA.

[6]  T. Lakes,et al.  Policy change, land use, and agriculture: The case of soy production and cattle ranching in Brazil, 2001–2012 , 2014 .

[7]  J. R. Eastman,et al.  Land cover change in the Bolivian Amazon and its implications for REDD+ and endemic biodiversity , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  Modeling multiple land use changes using ANN, CART and MARS: Comparing tradeoffs in goodness of fit and explanatory power of data mining tools , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[9]  Bryan C. Pijanowski,et al.  Comparing three global parametric and local non-parametric models to simulate land use change in diverse areas of the world , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[10]  Peter H Verburg,et al.  Land cover change or land‐use intensification: simulating land system change with a global‐scale land change model , 2013, Global change biology.

[11]  R. Pontius QUANTIFICATION ERROR VERSUS LOCATION ERROR IN COMPARISON OF CATEGORICAL MAPS , 2000 .

[12]  Tobia Lakes,et al.  Cropland change in southern Romania: a comparison of logistic regressions and artificial neural networks , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support , 2003 .

[14]  Robert J. Lilieholm,et al.  Using Bayesian belief networks to identify potential compatibilities and conflicts between development and landscape conservation , 2011 .

[15]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  A Suite of Tools for ROC Analysis of Spatial Models , 2013, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[16]  R. Müller,et al.  Proximate causes of deforestation in the Bolivian lowlands: an analysis of spatial dynamics , 2012, Regional Environmental Change.

[17]  P Glasziou,et al.  Test Selection Measures , 1989, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Opportunities to Improve Impact, Integration, and Evaluation of Land Change Models , 2013 .

[19]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change , 2014 .

[20]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Recommendations for using the relative operating characteristic (ROC) , 2013, Landscape Ecology.

[21]  Nicholas Malizia,et al.  The Effect of Data Inaccuracy on Tests of Space‐Time Interaction , 2013, Trans. GIS.

[22]  A. Hagen-Zanker,et al.  A fuzzy set approach to assess the predictive accuracy of land use simulations , 2013 .

[23]  J. Koch,et al.  Model-based analysis of the environmental impacts of grazing management on Eastern Mediterranean ecosystems in Jordan. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Using the Relative Operating Characteristic to Quantify Certainty in Prediction of Location of Land Cover Change in India , 2003, Trans. GIS.

[25]  Sean Sloan,et al.  How accurately may we project tropical forest-cover change? A validation of a forward-looking baseline for REDD , 2012 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[27]  E. Sills,et al.  Welfare Outcomes and the Advance of the Deforestation Frontier in the Brazilian Amazon , 2012 .

[28]  Suzana Dragicevic,et al.  Bayesian networks and agent-based modeling approach for urban land-use and population density change: a BNAS model , 2012, Journal of Geographical Systems.

[29]  F.J.M. van der Wel,et al.  Assessment and visualisation of uncertainty in remote sensing land cover classifications , 2000 .

[30]  PETER H. VERBURG,et al.  Modeling the Spatial Dynamics of Regional Land Use: The CLUE-S Model , 2002, Environmental management.

[31]  R. Real,et al.  AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models , 2008 .

[32]  E. Reis,et al.  Property rights and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon , 2009 .

[33]  Rafael Rumí,et al.  Bayesian networks in environmental modelling , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[34]  R. Pontius,et al.  Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[35]  B. Marcot,et al.  Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation , 2006 .

[36]  Alex Hagen-Zanker,et al.  An improved Fuzzy Kappa statistic that accounts for spatial autocorrelation , 2009, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[37]  Tobia Lakes,et al.  Bayesian belief networks as a versatile method for assessing uncertainty in land-change modeling , 2015, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[38]  S. Gopal Error (Propagation and Modeling) , 2009 .

[39]  P. Verburg,et al.  Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Dirk Pflugmacher,et al.  Regime shifts limit the predictability of land-system change , 2014 .

[41]  Jennifer Koch,et al.  An integrated approach to modelling land-use change on continental and global scales , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[43]  Edzer Pebesma,et al.  Agricultural land use dynamics in the Brazilian Amazon based on remote sensing and census data , 2012 .

[44]  A. Bregt,et al.  Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models , 2011 .

[45]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change , 2008 .

[46]  R. Pontius,et al.  Accuracy Assessment for a Simulation Model of Amazonian Deforestation , 2007 .

[47]  Martin Paegelow,et al.  Inductive pattern-based land use/cover change models: A comparison of four software packages , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[48]  Nitin Khanna,et al.  Assessing uncertainty dimensions in land-use change models: using swap and multiplicative error models for injecting attribute and positional errors in spatial data , 2014 .

[49]  Alex Hagen,et al.  Fuzzy set approach to assessing similarity of categorical maps , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[50]  Daniel Müller,et al.  A framework for modeling payments for ecosystem services with agent-based models, Bayesian belief networks and opinion dynamics models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  Oh Seok Kim An Assessment of Deforestation Models for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[52]  S. D. Zen,et al.  Ranching and the new global range: Amazônia in the 21st century , 2009 .

[53]  Alexis J. Comber Geographically weighted methods for estimating local surfaces of overall, user and producer accuracies , 2013 .

[54]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Local characterization of thematic classification accuracy through spatially constrained confusion matrices , 2005 .

[55]  Marco Scutari,et al.  Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package , 2009, 0908.3817.