Track structure in radiation biology: theory and applications.

PURPOSE A brief review is presented of the basic concepts in track structure and the relative merit of various theoretical approaches adopted in Monte-Carlo track-structure codes are examined. In the second part of the paper, a formal cluster analysis is introduced to calculate cluster-distance distributions. METHOD Total experimental ionization cross-sections were least-square fitted and compared with the calculation by various theoretical methods. Monte-Carlo track-structure code Kurbuc was used to examine and compare the spectrum of the secondary electrons generated by using functions given by Born-Bethe, Jain-Khare, Gryzinsky, Kim-Rudd, Mott and Vriens' theories. The cluster analysis in track structure was carried out using the k-means method and Hartigan algorithm. RESULTS Data are presented on experimental and calculated total ionization cross-sections: inverse mean free path (IMFP) as a function of electron energy used in Monte-Carlo track-structure codes; the spectrum of secondary electrons generated by different functions for 500 eV primary electrons; cluster analysis for 4 MeV and 20 MeV alpha-particles in terms of the frequency of total cluster energy to the root-mean-square (rms) radius of the cluster and differential distance distributions for a pair of clusters; and finally relative frequency distribution for energy deposited in DNA, single-strand break and double-strand breaks for 10MeV/u protons, alpha-particles and carbon ions. CONCLUSIONS There are a number of Monte-Carlo track-structure codes that have been developed independently and the bench-marking presented in this paper allows a better choice of the theoretical method adopted in a track-structure code to be made. A systematic bench-marking of cross-sections and spectra of the secondary electrons shows differences between the codes at atomic level, but such differences are not significant in biophysical modelling at the macromolecular level. Clustered-damage evaluation shows: that a substantial proportion of dose ( 30%) is deposited by low-energy electrons; the majority of DNA damage lesions are of simple type; the complexity of damage increases with increased LET, while the total yield of strand breaks remains constant; and at high LET values nearly 70% of all double-strand breaks are of complex type.

[1]  E. Forgy,et al.  Cluster analysis of multivariate data : efficiency versus interpretability of classifications , 1965 .

[2]  M. Zaider,et al.  Charged-particle transport in biomolecular media: the third generation. , 1994, Basic life sciences.

[3]  W. John,et al.  Calculation of Heavy Ion Inactivation and Mutation Rates in Radial Dose Model of Track Structure , 1997 .

[4]  R. Katz,et al.  Theory of RBE for heavy ion bombardment of dry enzymes and viruses. , 1967, Radiation research.

[5]  F. A. Smith,et al.  Calculation of initial and primary yields in the radiolysis of water , 1994 .

[6]  Walter Gilbert,et al.  Towards a paradigm shift in biology , 1991, Nature.

[7]  G. Badhwar,et al.  TRACK STRUCTURE AND RADIATION TRANSPORT MODEL FOR SPACE RADIOBIOLOGY STUDIES , 1996 .

[8]  J. F. Briesmeister.  MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[9]  M. E. Rudd,et al.  Secondary electron spectra from charged particle interactions , 1996 .

[10]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Computer simulation of initial events in the biochemical mechanisms of DNA damage. , 1993, Advances in radiation biology.

[11]  J. Ward,et al.  The complexity of DNA damage: relevance to biological consequences. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[12]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Comparison of Energy Deposition in Small Cylindrical Volumes by Electrons Generated by Monte Carlo Track Structure Codes for Gaseous and Liquid Water , 1994 .

[13]  V. Moiseenko,et al.  Modelling the kinetics of chromosome exchange formation in human cells exposed to ionising radiation , 1996, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[14]  J. E. Turner,et al.  Radiation Interactions and Energy Transport in the Condensed Phase , 1991 .

[15]  John A. Hartigan,et al.  Clustering Algorithms , 1975 .

[16]  James E. Turner,et al.  Physical and Chemical Development of Electron Tracks in Liquid Water , 1983 .

[17]  V. Michalik,et al.  Charged particle tracks in water of different phases. Monte Carlo simulation of electron tracks , 1996 .

[18]  M. Scholz,et al.  Computation of cell survival in heavy ion beams for therapy , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[19]  D. Burmistrov,et al.  “Trion” code for radiation action calculations and its application in microdosimetry and radiobiology , 1993, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[20]  Marco Zaider,et al.  The Applications of Track Calculations to Radiobiology I. Monte Carlo Simulation of Proton Tracks , 1983 .

[21]  S. Pimblott,et al.  Structure of electron tracks in water. 2. Distribution of primary ionizations and excitations in water radiolysis , 1991 .

[22]  D J Brenner,et al.  Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply damaged sites associated with DNA double-strand breaks. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[23]  V. Michalik.  Energy deposition clusters in nanometer regions of charged-particle tracks. , 1993, Radiation research.

[24]  M. Parikh.  Corrections to proximity effects in electron beam lithography. I. Theory , 1979 .

[25]  A. Beaudré,et al.  Simulation of Space and Time Evolution of Radiolytic Species Induced by Electrons in Water , 1990 .

[26]  D. Brenner,et al.  Track structure, chromosome geometry and chromosome aberrations. , 1994, Basic life sciences.

[27]  R. Cox,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of radiation oncogenesis. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[28]  R. Shimizu,et al.  Monte Carlo calculation approach to quantitative Auger electron spectroscopy , 1980 .

[29]  W. E. Wilson,et al.  Calculation of Distributions for Energy Imparted and Ionization by Fast Protons in Nanometer Sites , 1981 .

[30]  D. Charlton,et al.  A method of calculating initial DNA strand breakage following the decay of incorporated 125I. , 1988, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[31]  P O'Neill,et al.  Computational modelling of low-energy electron-induced DNA damage by early physical and chemical events. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[32]  W E Bolch,et al.  Monte Carlo track-structure calculations for aqueous solutions containing biomolecules. , 1994, Basic life sciences.

[33]  J. Magee,et al.  Production of DNA strand breaks by direct effects of heavy charged particles. , 1990, Radiation research.

[34]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Mutation and inactivation of cultured mammalian cells exposed to beams of accelerated heavy ions. IV. Biophysical interpretation. , 1980, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[35]  P Andreo,et al.  Monte Carlo calculated stopping-power ratios, water/air, for clinical proton dosimetry (50-250 MeV). , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Aloke Chatterjee,et al.  Clusters of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation: Formation of Short DNA Fragments. I. Theoretical Modeling , 1996 .

[37]  H Nikjoo,et al.  Calculation of initial yields of single- and double-strand breaks in cell nuclei from electrons, protons and alpha particles. , 1989, International journal of radiation biology.

[38]  D. Rogers,et al.  EGS4 code system , 1985 .