Assessing the imaging capabilities of radial mechanical and electronic echo-endoscopes using the resolution integral.

Over the past decade there have been significant advances in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) technology. Although there is an expectation that new technology will deliver improved image quality, there are few methods or phantoms available for assessing the capabilities of mechanical and electronic EUS systems. The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of assessing the imaging capability of available EUS technologies using measurements of the resolution integral made with an Edinburgh Pipe Phantom. Various radial EUS echo-endoscopes and probes were assessed using an Edinburgh Pipe Phantom. Measurements of the resolution integral (R), depth of field (LR) and characteristic resolution (DR) were made at all operating frequencies. The mean R value for Fuji miniprobes was 16.0. The GF-UM20 and GF-UM2000 mechanical radial scopes had mean R values of 24.0 and 28.5, respectively. The two electronic radial echo-endoscopes had similar mean R values of 34.3 and 34.6 for the Olympus GF-UE260 and Fujinon EG-530 UR scopes, respectively. Despite being older technology, the mechanical GF-UM2000 scope had superior characteristic resolution (DR), but could not compare with the depths of field (LR) delivered by the current generation of electronic radial scopes, especially at the standard operating frequencies of 7.5 and 12 MHz.

[1]  S D Pye,et al.  The resolution integral: visual and computational approaches to characterizing ultrasound images , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  S. Pye,et al.  The Resolution Integral as a metric of performance for diagnostic grey-scale imaging , 2011 .

[3]  K. Shung,et al.  Fabrication and performance of endoscopic ultrasound radial arrays based on PMN-PT single crystal/epoxy 1-3 composite , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  M. Birch,et al.  The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Mihir S. Wagh,et al.  The EUS hardware store: state of the art technical review of instruments and equipment (with videos). , 2007, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[6]  T. Tio.  Endosonography in Gastroenterology , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[7]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[8]  P. Hoskins,et al.  Assessment of the acoustic properties of common tissue-mimicking test phantoms. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  H. Pohl,et al.  Prospective, randomized comparison of mechanical and electronic radial endoscopic ultrasound systems: Assessment of performance parameters and image quality , 2009, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology.

[10]  K. Yasuda,et al.  CLINICAL USE OF THE NEWLY DEVELOPED ELECTRONIC RADIAL ULTRASOUND ENDOSCOPE , 2006 .

[11]  K V Ramnarine,et al.  Construction and geometric stability of physiological flow rate wall-less stenosis phantoms. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Nikolai Hungr,et al.  A realistic deformable prostate phantom for multimodal imaging and needle-insertion procedures. , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  M. Smith,et al.  A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma , 2001, Gut.

[14]  S. Inglis.  Development of a freehand three-dimensional radial endoscopic ultrasonography system , 2009 .

[15]  Wolfgang A. Tome,et al.  Quality assurance of ultrasound imaging systems for target localization and online setup corrections. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  A. Irisawa,et al.  An electronic radial scanning echoendoscope is superior to a mechanical radial scanning echoendoscope in ultrasound image quality for gastrointestinal tract and pancreaticobiliary lesions. , 2010, Fukushima journal of medical science.

[17]  Scott Inglis,et al.  An anthropomorphic tissue-mimicking phantom of the oesophagus for endoscopic ultrasound. , 2006, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  G. Tytgat,et al.  Esophagogastric carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. , 1989, Radiology.

[19]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  The Speed of Sound and Attenuation of an IEC Agar-Based Tissue-Mimicking Material for High Frequency Ultrasound Applications , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Tom MacGillivray,et al.  Medical ultrasound: a new metric of performance for grey-scale imaging , 2004 .

[21]  K. Yasuda,et al.  NEWLY DEVELOPED ULTRASOUND ENDOSCOPE WITH AN ELECTRONIC RADIAL ARRAY TRANSDUCER , 2004 .

[22]  Y. Hirooka,et al.  Comparison of image quality between electronic and mechanical radial scanning echoendoscopes in pancreatic diseases , 2004, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.

[23]  Y. Hirooka,et al.  Preclinical study of endoscopic ultrasonography with electronic radial scanning echoendoscope , 2003, Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology.