Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Shelly R Peyton,et al. The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. , 2008, Biomaterials.
[2] W. Saltzman,et al. Topographical control of human neutrophil motility on micropatterned materials with various surface chemistry. , 2002, Biomaterials.
[3] T. Horbett,et al. Proteins at Interfaces III: Introductory Overview , 2012 .
[4] A S G Curtis,et al. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.
[5] D. G. T. Strange,et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.
[6] Kshitiz Gupta,et al. Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[7] David J. Mooney,et al. Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.
[8] Donald E. Ingber,et al. Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.
[9] Sungho Jin,et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[10] A. Yee,et al. Reversal imprinting by transferring polymer from mold to substrate , 2002 .
[11] R Geoff Richards,et al. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.
[12] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.
[13] R. Oreffo,et al. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[14] Kshitiz,et al. Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues. , 2014, Biomaterials.
[15] Ulrich S Schwarz,et al. United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.
[16] C. Wilkinson,et al. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[17] J. Hubbell,et al. An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.
[18] J. Spatz,et al. Block Copolymer Micelle Nanolithography , 2003 .
[19] J. Lahann,et al. Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity. , 2012, Small.
[20] Albert J. Keung,et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. , 2008, Biophysical journal.
[21] Se-Jin Choi,et al. Modulus- and surface energy-tunable ultraviolet-curable polyurethane acrylate: properties and applications , 2011 .
[22] Ali Khademhosseini,et al. Nanoscale tissue engineering: spatial control over cell-materials interactions , 2011, Nanotechnology.
[23] Dennis Discher,et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.
[24] C. Murphy,et al. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[25] Subbu S Venkatraman,et al. The effect of topography of polymer surfaces on platelet adhesion. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[26] W. Tsai,et al. Modulation of osteogenic, adipogenic and myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by submicron grooved topography , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.
[27] F M Watt,et al. Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix. , 1993, Development.
[28] C. Murphy,et al. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.
[29] Rong Fan,et al. Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. , 2012, ACS nano.
[30] N. Jeon,et al. The effect of matrix density on the regulation of 3-D capillary morphogenesis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.
[31] Valerie M. Weaver,et al. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.
[32] Christopher J Murphy,et al. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.
[33] Choon Kiat Lim,et al. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. , 2013, ACS nano.
[34] A. Yee,et al. Expression of Oct4 in human embryonic stem cells is dependent on nanotopographical configuration. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.
[35] Mitsuru Nenoi,et al. Regulation of , 2004 .
[36] C. Wilkinson,et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.
[37] Daniel J. Muller,et al. The effect of unlocking RGD-motifs in collagen I on pre-osteoblast adhesion and differentiation. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[38] J. Jansen,et al. The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[39] P. Russell,et al. The modulation of canine mesenchymal stem cells by nano-topographic cues. , 2012, Experimental cell research.
[40] M. Dembo,et al. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[41] Milan Mrksich,et al. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] S. Weiss,et al. MT1-MMP-dependent control of skeletal stem cell commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ signaling axis. , 2013, Developmental cell.
[43] Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al. Co-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale RGD organization and mechanical stimulus. , 2002, Journal of cell science.
[44] Eben Alsberg,et al. FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] M. Textor,et al. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[46] Dongyuan Lü,et al. Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography. , 2014, Biomaterials.
[47] Kam W Leong,et al. Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.
[48] D. Moratal,et al. Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organisation. , 2010, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.
[49] K. Jandt,et al. Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.
[50] A. Kundu,et al. Adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells to polymer scaffolds occurs via distinct ECM ligands and controls their osteogenic differentiation. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[51] Andre Levchenko,et al. Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.
[52] Stefano Piccolo,et al. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[53] Regina Luttge,et al. The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[54] Daniel Choquet,et al. Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.
[55] Kenneth M. Yamada,et al. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.
[56] Christopher S. Chen,et al. Cellular and multicellular form and function. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[57] T. Horbett. Protein Adsorption on Biomaterials , 1982 .
[58] T. Barker. The role of ECM proteins and protein fragments in guiding cell behavior in regenerative medicine. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[59] Joshua C. Hansen,et al. The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. , 2007, Biomaterials.
[60] E. Ruoslahti. Fibronectin and its receptors. , 1988, Annual review of biochemistry.
[61] Adam J. Engler,et al. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.
[62] R. Marchant,et al. Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds , 2011, Expert review of medical devices.
[63] M. Théry,et al. Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.
[64] C. Werner,et al. Dissecting the impact of matrix anchorage and elasticity in cell adhesion. , 2009, Biophysical journal.
[65] David J. Mooney,et al. Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.
[66] Anne E Carpenter,et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[67] Kristi S. Anseth,et al. Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.
[68] Benjamin G. Keselowsky,et al. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[69] T. Horbett,et al. Protein interactions with surfaces: cellular responses, complement activation, and newer methods. , 2011, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[70] Christopher J Murphy,et al. Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. , 2012, Biomaterials.
[71] Kristyn S Masters,et al. Regulation of valvular interstitial cell calcification by adhesive peptide sequences. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[72] A. J. Putnam,et al. Nanotopographic Substrates of Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Do Not Strongly Influence the Osteogenic Phenotype of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro , 2014, PloS one.
[73] A. De Arcangelis,et al. Integrin and ECM functions: roles in vertebrate development. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[74] Y. Wang,et al. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[75] R. Latour,et al. The adherence of platelets to adsorbed albumin by receptor-mediated recognition of binding sites exposed by adsorption-induced unfolding. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[76] A. Levchenko,et al. Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.
[77] Robert A Latour,et al. The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[78] Benjamin Geiger,et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[79] Andre Levchenko,et al. Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[80] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.
[81] Joe Tien,et al. Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[82] A. Kundu,et al. Vitronectin and collagen I differentially regulate osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.
[83] T. Webster,et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[84] P. Janmey,et al. Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.
[85] Andre Levchenko,et al. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.
[86] P. Prendergast,et al. Comparative Locomotory Behavior of T Lymphocytes versus T Lymphoma Cells on Flat and Grooved Surfaces , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.
[87] L G Griffith,et al. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.
[88] D E Ingber,et al. Controlling cell attachment on contoured surfaces with self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[89] Min Cheol Park,et al. Capillary Force Lithography: A Versatile Tool for Structured Biomaterials Interface Towards Cell and Tissue Engineering , 2009 .
[90] George E. Plopper,et al. Adhesion to Vitronectin and Collagen I Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2004, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.
[91] Tatiana Segura,et al. Evolving the use of peptides as components of biomaterials. , 2011, Biomaterials.
[92] Paolo P. Provenzano,et al. Aligned Collagen Is a Prognostic Signature for Survival in Human Breast Carcinoma Address Reprint Requests to See Related Commentary on Page 966 , 2022 .
[93] D. Irvine,et al. Nanoscale clustering of RGD peptides at surfaces using Comb polymers. 1. Synthesis and characterization of Comb thin films. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.
[94] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. ECM Compliance Regulates Osteogenesis by Influencing MAPK Signaling Downstream of RhoA and ROCK , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
[95] Joachim P Spatz,et al. Nanopatterning by block copolymer micelle nanolithography and bioinspired applications. , 2011, Biointerphases.
[96] Daniel G. Anderson,et al. Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.
[97] C J Murphy,et al. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[98] V. Vogel,et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exploit Extracellular Matrix as Mechanotransducer , 2013, Scientific Reports.
[99] D. Grainger,et al. Adsorbed serum albumin is permissive to macrophage attachment to perfluorocarbon polymer surfaces in culture. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.
[100] Cameron J Wilson,et al. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.
[101] J. Spatz,et al. Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.
[102] Ki-Taek Lim,et al. Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.
[103] Adam J. Engler,et al. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation , 2006 .
[104] N. Elvassore,et al. A Mechanical Checkpoint Controls Multicellular Growth through YAP/TAZ Regulation by Actin-Processing Factors , 2013, Cell.
[105] I. Rodríguez,et al. Conformational behavior of fibrinogen on topographically modified polymer surfaces. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[106] Jianping Fu,et al. Hippo/YAP-mediated rigidity-dependent motor neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature materials.
[107] N. Gadegaard,et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.
[108] Sirio Dupont. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011 .
[109] Jun Nakanishi,et al. Hippo pathway effectors control cardiac progenitor cell fate by acting as dynamic sensors of substrate mechanics and nanostructure. , 2014, ACS nano.
[110] J. Jansen,et al. The effect of nanometric surface texture on bone contact to titanium implants in rabbit tibia. , 2013, Biomaterials.
[111] Andrés J. García,et al. Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[112] Se-Jin Choi,et al. An ultraviolet-curable mold for sub-100-nm lithography. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[113] B. Geiger,et al. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[114] Christopher S. Chen,et al. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.
[115] M. Sheetz,et al. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[116] Tae-Hyun Nam,et al. Role of subnano-, nano- and submicron-surface features on osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.
[117] Emmanuel Delamarche,et al. Nanopatterning reveals an ECM area threshold for focal adhesion assembly and force transmission that is regulated by integrin activation and cytoskeleton tension , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.
[118] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3‐E1 cells requires MAPK activation , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.
[119] Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.
[120] Joyce Y. Wong,et al. Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels† , 2003 .
[121] Heinz Schmid,et al. Printing Patterns of Proteins , 1998 .
[122] P. Moghe,et al. Substrate microtopography can enhance cell adhesive and migratory responsiveness to matrix ligand density. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[123] C. Wilkinson,et al. Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.
[124] F. Stellacci,et al. Nanoscale Topography and Chemistry Affect Embryonic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal and Early Differentiation , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.
[125] Zhenbiao Yang,et al. RHO Gtpases and the Actin Cytoskeleton , 2000 .
[126] S. Sen,et al. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.
[127] A S G Curtis,et al. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.
[128] Matthew J Dalby,et al. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. , 2002, Experimental cell research.
[129] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.
[130] Wesley R. Legant,et al. Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.
[131] Y. Bréchet,et al. Protein conformational changes induced by adsorption onto material surfaces: an important issue for biomedical applications of material science , 2010 .
[132] A. V. von Recum,et al. Effect of Titanium Surface Texture on the Cell-Biomaterial Interface , 2003, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.
[133] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[134] Farshid Guilak,et al. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.
[135] Andrés J. García,et al. Biomimetic surfaces for control of cell adhesion to facilitate bone formation. , 2002, Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression.
[136] Sungho Jin,et al. Enhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfaces. , 2008, Nano letters.