Extracellular matrix elasticity and topography: material-based cues that affect cell function via conserved mechanisms.

Chemical, mechanical, and topographic extracellular matrix (ECM) cues have been extensively studied for their influence on cell behavior. These ECM cues alter cell adhesion, cell shape, and cell migration and activate signal transduction pathways to influence gene expression, proliferation, and differentiation. ECM elasticity and topography, in particular, have emerged as material properties of intense focus based on strong evidence these physical cues can partially dictate stem cell differentiation. Cells generate forces to pull on their adhesive contacts, and these tractional forces appear to be a common element of cells' responses to both elasticity and topography. This review focuses on recently published work that links ECM topography and mechanics and their influence on differentiation and other cell behaviors. We also highlight signaling pathways typically implicated in mechanotransduction that are (or may be) shared by cells subjected to topographic cues. Finally, we conclude with a brief discussion of the potential implications of these commonalities for cell based therapies and biomaterial design.

[1]  Shelly R Peyton,et al.  The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-D biosynthetic hydrogel system. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[2]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Topographical control of human neutrophil motility on micropatterned materials with various surface chemistry. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[3]  T. Horbett,et al.  Proteins at Interfaces III: Introductory Overview , 2012 .

[4]  A S G Curtis,et al.  Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[5]  D. G. T. Strange,et al.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. , 2012, Nature materials.

[6]  Kshitiz Gupta,et al.  Mechanosensitivity of fibroblast cell shape and movement to anisotropic substratum topography gradients. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[7]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Harnessing Traction-Mediated Manipulation of the Cell-Matrix Interface to Control Stem Cell Fate , 2010, Nature materials.

[8]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[9]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  A. Yee,et al.  Reversal imprinting by transferring polymer from mold to substrate , 2002 .

[11]  R Geoff Richards,et al.  The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and ERK/MAPK signalling in STRO-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[12]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[13]  R. Oreffo,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[14]  Kshitiz,et al.  Spatial control of adult stem cell fate using nanotopographic cues. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[15]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[16]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[17]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  J. Spatz,et al.  Block Copolymer Micelle Nanolithography , 2003 .

[19]  J. Lahann,et al.  Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity. , 2012, Small.

[20]  Albert J. Keung,et al.  Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Se-Jin Choi,et al.  Modulus- and surface energy-tunable ultraviolet-curable polyurethane acrylate: properties and applications , 2011 .

[22]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Nanoscale tissue engineering: spatial control over cell-materials interactions , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[23]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[24]  C. Murphy,et al.  Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[25]  Subbu S Venkatraman,et al.  The effect of topography of polymer surfaces on platelet adhesion. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  W. Tsai,et al.  Modulation of osteogenic, adipogenic and myogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by submicron grooved topography , 2012, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[27]  F M Watt,et al.  Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix. , 1993, Development.

[28]  C. Murphy,et al.  Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[29]  Rong Fan,et al.  Nanotopography influences adhesion, spreading, and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. , 2012, ACS nano.

[30]  N. Jeon,et al.  The effect of matrix density on the regulation of 3-D capillary morphogenesis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Valerie M. Weaver,et al.  A tense situation: forcing tumour progression , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[32]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[33]  Choon Kiat Lim,et al.  Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. , 2013, ACS nano.

[34]  A. Yee,et al.  Expression of Oct4 in human embryonic stem cells is dependent on nanotopographical configuration. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[35]  Mitsuru Nenoi,et al.  Regulation of , 2004 .

[36]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. , 2007, Nature materials.

[37]  Daniel J. Muller,et al.  The effect of unlocking RGD-motifs in collagen I on pre-osteoblast adhesion and differentiation. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[38]  J. Jansen,et al.  The influence of nanoscale grooved substrates on osteoblast behavior and extracellular matrix deposition. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[39]  P. Russell,et al.  The modulation of canine mesenchymal stem cells by nano-topographic cues. , 2012, Experimental cell research.

[40]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[41]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  S. Weiss,et al.  MT1-MMP-dependent control of skeletal stem cell commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ signaling axis. , 2013, Developmental cell.

[43]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Co-regulation of cell adhesion by nanoscale RGD organization and mechanical stimulus. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[44]  Eben Alsberg,et al.  FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  M. Textor,et al.  Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[46]  Dongyuan Lü,et al.  Differential regulation of morphology and stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells by substrate stiffness and topography. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[47]  Kam W Leong,et al.  Nanopattern-induced changes in morphology and motility of smooth muscle cells. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[48]  D. Moratal,et al.  Effect of nanoscale topography on fibronectin adsorption, focal adhesion size and matrix organisation. , 2010, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[49]  K. Jandt,et al.  Does the nanometre scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? , 2006, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[50]  A. Kundu,et al.  Adhesion of mesenchymal stem cells to polymer scaffolds occurs via distinct ECM ligands and controls their osteogenic differentiation. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[51]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Synergistically enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells by culture on nanostructured surfaces with induction media. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[52]  Stefano Piccolo,et al.  Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[53]  Regina Luttge,et al.  The interaction between nanoscale surface features and mechanical loading and its effect on osteoblast-like cells behavior. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[54]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Causes Strengthening of Integrin–Cytoskeleton Linkages , 1997, Cell.

[55]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[56]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cellular and multicellular form and function. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[57]  T. Horbett Protein Adsorption on Biomaterials , 1982 .

[58]  T. Barker The role of ECM proteins and protein fragments in guiding cell behavior in regenerative medicine. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[59]  Joshua C. Hansen,et al.  The regulation of integrin-mediated osteoblast focal adhesion and focal adhesion kinase expression by nanoscale topography. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[60]  E. Ruoslahti Fibronectin and its receptors. , 1988, Annual review of biochemistry.

[61]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[62]  R. Marchant,et al.  Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds , 2011, Expert review of medical devices.

[63]  M. Théry,et al.  Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[64]  C. Werner,et al.  Dissecting the impact of matrix anchorage and elasticity in cell adhesion. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[65]  David J. Mooney,et al.  Growth Factors, Matrices, and Forces Combine and Control Stem Cells , 2009, Science.

[66]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.

[68]  Benjamin G. Keselowsky,et al.  Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  T. Horbett,et al.  Protein interactions with surfaces: cellular responses, complement activation, and newer methods. , 2011, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[70]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Modulation of osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs cells by submicron topographically-patterned ridges and grooves. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[71]  Kristyn S Masters,et al.  Regulation of valvular interstitial cell calcification by adhesive peptide sequences. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[72]  A. J. Putnam,et al.  Nanotopographic Substrates of Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Do Not Strongly Influence the Osteogenic Phenotype of Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro , 2014, PloS one.

[73]  A. De Arcangelis,et al.  Integrin and ECM functions: roles in vertebrate development. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[74]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[75]  R. Latour,et al.  The adherence of platelets to adsorbed albumin by receptor-mediated recognition of binding sites exposed by adsorption-induced unfolding. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[76]  A. Levchenko,et al.  Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. , 2009, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[77]  Robert A Latour,et al.  The relationship between platelet adhesion on surfaces and the structure versus the amount of adsorbed fibrinogen. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[78]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[79]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Nanoscale cues regulate the structure and function of macroscopic cardiac tissue constructs , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[81]  Joe Tien,et al.  Repositioning of cells by mechanotaxis on surfaces with micropatterned Young's modulus. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[82]  A. Kundu,et al.  Vitronectin and collagen I differentially regulate osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[83]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[84]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[85]  Andre Levchenko,et al.  Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[86]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Comparative Locomotory Behavior of T Lymphocytes versus T Lymphoma Cells on Flat and Grooved Surfaces , 2003, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[87]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[88]  D E Ingber,et al.  Controlling cell attachment on contoured surfaces with self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on gold. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  Min Cheol Park,et al.  Capillary Force Lithography: A Versatile Tool for Structured Biomaterials Interface Towards Cell and Tissue Engineering , 2009 .

[90]  George E. Plopper,et al.  Adhesion to Vitronectin and Collagen I Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2004, Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology.

[91]  Tatiana Segura,et al.  Evolving the use of peptides as components of biomaterials. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[92]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Aligned Collagen Is a Prognostic Signature for Survival in Human Breast Carcinoma Address Reprint Requests to See Related Commentary on Page 966 , 2022 .

[93]  D. Irvine,et al.  Nanoscale clustering of RGD peptides at surfaces using Comb polymers. 1. Synthesis and characterization of Comb thin films. , 2001, Biomacromolecules.

[94]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  ECM Compliance Regulates Osteogenesis by Influencing MAPK Signaling Downstream of RhoA and ROCK , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[95]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Nanopatterning by block copolymer micelle nanolithography and bioinspired applications. , 2011, Biointerphases.

[96]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[97]  C J Murphy,et al.  Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[98]  V. Vogel,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells Exploit Extracellular Matrix as Mechanotransducer , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[99]  D. Grainger,et al.  Adsorbed serum albumin is permissive to macrophage attachment to perfluorocarbon polymer surfaces in culture. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[100]  Cameron J Wilson,et al.  Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[101]  J. Spatz,et al.  Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[102]  Ki-Taek Lim,et al.  Synergistic effects of nanotopography and co-culture with endothelial cells on osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[103]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation , 2006 .

[104]  N. Elvassore,et al.  A Mechanical Checkpoint Controls Multicellular Growth through YAP/TAZ Regulation by Actin-Processing Factors , 2013, Cell.

[105]  I. Rodríguez,et al.  Conformational behavior of fibrinogen on topographically modified polymer surfaces. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[106]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Hippo/YAP-mediated rigidity-dependent motor neuron differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature materials.

[107]  N. Gadegaard,et al.  Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. , 2011, Nature materials.

[108]  Sirio Dupont Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011 .

[109]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Hippo pathway effectors control cardiac progenitor cell fate by acting as dynamic sensors of substrate mechanics and nanostructure. , 2014, ACS nano.

[110]  J. Jansen,et al.  The effect of nanometric surface texture on bone contact to titanium implants in rabbit tibia. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[111]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Combined microscale mechanical topography and chemical patterns on polymer cell culture substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[112]  Se-Jin Choi,et al.  An ultraviolet-curable mold for sub-100-nm lithography. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[113]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[114]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[115]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[116]  Tae-Hyun Nam,et al.  Role of subnano-, nano- and submicron-surface features on osteoblast differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[117]  Emmanuel Delamarche,et al.  Nanopatterning reveals an ECM area threshold for focal adhesion assembly and force transmission that is regulated by integrin activation and cytoskeleton tension , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[118]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  The regulation of osteogenesis by ECM rigidity in MC3T3‐E1 cells requires MAPK activation , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[119]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[120]  Joyce Y. Wong,et al.  Directed Movement of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells on Gradient-Compliant Hydrogels† , 2003 .

[121]  Heinz Schmid,et al.  Printing Patterns of Proteins , 1998 .

[122]  P. Moghe,et al.  Substrate microtopography can enhance cell adhesive and migratory responsiveness to matrix ligand density. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[123]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important? , 2001, Biophysical chemistry.

[124]  F. Stellacci,et al.  Nanoscale Topography and Chemistry Affect Embryonic Stem Cell Self‐Renewal and Early Differentiation , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[125]  Zhenbiao Yang,et al.  RHO Gtpases and the Actin Cytoskeleton , 2000 .

[126]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[127]  A S G Curtis,et al.  In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[128]  Matthew J Dalby,et al.  Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[129]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[130]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Degradation-mediated cellular traction directs stem cell fate in covalently crosslinked three-dimensional hydrogels , 2013, Nature materials.

[131]  Y. Bréchet,et al.  Protein conformational changes induced by adsorption onto material surfaces: an important issue for biomedical applications of material science , 2010 .

[132]  A. V. von Recum,et al.  Effect of Titanium Surface Texture on the Cell-Biomaterial Interface , 2003, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[133]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  The use of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels to investigate the impact of ECM chemistry and mechanics on smooth muscle cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[134]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[135]  Andrés J. García,et al.  Biomimetic surfaces for control of cell adhesion to facilitate bone formation. , 2002, Critical Reviews in Eukaryotic Gene Expression.

[136]  Sungho Jin,et al.  Enhanced cellular mobility guided by TiO2 nanotube surfaces. , 2008, Nano letters.