The Perception of Speech Under Adverse Conditions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. W. Hukin,et al. Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference and frequency proximity. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] S. Zahorian,et al. Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] C. M. Marin,et al. Segregation of concurrent sounds. II: Effects of spectral envelope tracing, frequency modulation coherence, and frequency modulation width. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] M. E. Lutman,et al. Hearing science and hearing disorders , 1983 .
[5] C V Pavlovic,et al. An evaluation of some assumptions underlying the articulation index. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R. Patterson,et al. Complex Sounds and Auditory Images , 1992 .
[7] A. Macleod,et al. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.
[8] B. Delgutte,et al. Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] S. Sheft,et al. A simulated “cocktail party” with up to three sound sources , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[10] J. Mullennix,et al. Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .
[11] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns , 1987, Hearing Research.
[12] S Buus,et al. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[13] Brian Hanson,et al. Robust speaker-independent word recognition using static, dynamic and acceleration features: experiments with Lombard and noisy speech , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[14] Quentin Summerfield. Roles of Harmonicity and Coherent Frequency Modulation in Auditory Grouping. , 1992 .
[15] K. Stevens. Acoustic correlates of some phonetic categories. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] L. Carney,et al. Temporal coding of resonances by low-frequency auditory nerve fibers: single-fiber responses and a population model. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.
[17] J. C. R. Licklider,et al. Masking of Speech by Line‐Spectrum Interference , 1957 .
[18] G. E. Peterson,et al. Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .
[19] James P. Egan,et al. On the Intelligibility of Bands of Speech in Noise , 1946 .
[20] Allen A. Montgomery,et al. A Comparison of the Effects of Hearing Impairment and Acoustic Filtering on Consonant Recognition , 1981 .
[21] L. L. Elliott,et al. Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[22] N. Viemeister,et al. Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. Modeling the effects of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels , 1991 .
[24] D J Van Tasell,et al. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] T Houtgast,et al. Spectral sharpness and vowel dissimilarity. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] H Müsch,et al. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Q Summerfield. Speech perception in normal and impaired hearing. , 1987, British medical bulletin.
[28] D. Pisoni,et al. Speech perception without traditional speech cues. , 1981, Science.
[29] J M Festen,et al. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al. Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .
[31] Joseph W. Hall,et al. Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] T. Houtgast,et al. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Steven Greenberg,et al. Speech Intelligibility is Highly Tolerant of Cross-Channel Spectral Asynchrony , 1998 .
[34] I. Kheirallah,et al. Dynamic formant tracking of noisy speech using temporal analysis on outputs from a nonlinear cochlear model , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[35] R. Carhart,et al. Monaural and Binaural Discrimination against Competing Sentences , 1965 .
[36] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] G. F. Kuhn. Model for the interaural time differences in the azimuthal plane , 1977 .
[38] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] R Drullman,et al. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] N I Durlach,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[41] A. Bregman,et al. The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[42] R L Smith,et al. Adaptation, saturation, and physiological masking in single auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] D. Broadbent. Perception and communication , 1958 .
[44] H. Rubenstein,et al. Intelligibility of Known and Unknown Message Sets , 1959 .
[45] Richard Lippmann,et al. Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy , 1996, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[46] A. Nabelek,et al. English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] R. M. Warren,et al. Speech perception and phonemic restorations , 1971 .
[48] John H. Grose,et al. Relative Contributions of Envelope Maxima and Minima to Comodulation Masking Release , 1991 .
[49] D Kewley-Port,et al. Auditory models of formant frequency discrimination for isolated vowels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] R A Bentler,et al. Does hearing aid benefit increase over time? , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[51] B. Lindblom. Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .
[52] J. C. Webster,et al. Listening to Differentially Filtered Competing Voice Messages , 1955 .
[53] C V Pavlovic,et al. Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[54] T. M. Nearey. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[55] K. D. Kryter. Effects of Ear Protective Devices on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise , 1946 .
[56] J. M. Pickett,et al. Effects of Vocal Force on the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1956 .
[57] Steven Greenberg,et al. Speech intelligibility derived from exceedingly sparse spectral information , 1998, ICSLP.
[58] R. W. Hukin,et al. Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[59] A. Nabelek,et al. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] Sang Joon Kim,et al. A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .
[61] T W Tillman,et al. Release from multiple maskers: effects of interaural time disparities. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[62] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[63] R. Plomp. The Role of Modulation in Hearing , 1983 .
[64] J K Shallop,et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System. , 1994, The American journal of otology.
[65] F. A. Bilsen,et al. Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing , 1980 .
[66] P K Kuhl,et al. The contribution of fundamental frequency, amplitude envelope, and voicing duration cues to speechreading in normal-hearing subjects. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[67] R. Keith,et al. An effect of linguistic experience. Auditory word discrimination by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[68] K S Helfer,et al. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[69] R P Carlyon. Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[70] P F Assmann. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Role of formant transitions. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[71] John J. Dreher,et al. Effects of ambient noise on speaker intelligibility of words and phrases , 1957, The Laryngoscope.
[72] Christine M. Rankovic. An Application of the Articulation Index to Hearing Aid Fitting , 1991 .
[73] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[74] Irwin Pollack,et al. Masking of Speech by Noise at High Sound Levels , 1958 .
[75] A. Cheveigné. Concurrent vowel identification. III. A neural model of harmonic interference cancellation , 1997 .
[76] P F Assmann,et al. The Perception of Back Vowels: Centre of Gravity Hypothesis , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[77] C W Turner,et al. Spread of masking in normal subjects and in subjects with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1986, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[78] James A. Bashford,et al. Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations , 1992 .
[79] S Gatehouse,et al. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[80] P E Rubin,et al. On the intonation of sinusoidal sentences: contour and pitch height. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[81] Q Summerfield,et al. Auditory enhancement and the perception of concurrent vowels , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[82] A. Duquesnoy. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[83] B C Moore,et al. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[84] W. Ainsworth. Advances in speech, hearing and language processing , 1990 .
[85] C. Darwin,et al. Extracting spectral envelopes: formant frequency matching between sounds on different and modulated fundamental frequencies. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[86] A. J. Watkins,et al. Effects of spectral contrast on perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[87] C Elberling,et al. Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[88] K S Helfer,et al. Aging and the binaural advantage in reverberation and noise. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[89] G. Fant,et al. Two-formant Models, Pitch and Vowel Perception , 1975 .
[90] Steven Greenberg,et al. Speech intelligibility in the presence of cross-channel spectral asynchrony , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP '98 (Cat. No.98CH36181).
[91] T W Tillman,et al. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[92] B. Lindblom,et al. Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[93] J. Pickett,et al. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1974, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[94] K. Suomi,et al. On talker and phoneme information conveyed by vowels: A whole spectrum approach to the normalization problem , 1984, Speech Commun..
[95] V C Tartter,et al. Identifiability of vowels and speakers from whispered syllables , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[96] C. Darwin,et al. The role of timbre in the segregation of simultaneous voices with intersecting F0 contours , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[97] D A Fabry,et al. Vowel identification and vowel masking patterns of hearing-impaired subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[98] M F Dorman,et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using simulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[99] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[100] J A Bashford,et al. Spectral restoration of speech: Intelligibility is increased by inserting noise in spectral gaps , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.
[101] A. Liberman,et al. Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.
[102] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[103] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Recognition of multiply degraded speech by young and elderly listeners. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[104] Robert P Carlyon,et al. Changes in the masked thresholds of brief tones produced by prior bursts of noise , 1989, Hearing Research.
[105] Cj. Darwin. Listening to two Things at Once , 1992 .
[106] F. Zeng,et al. Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[107] S Gatehouse,et al. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[108] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[109] B. Delgutte,et al. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch, and the dominance region for pitch. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.
[110] Q Summerfield,et al. The role of frequency modulation in the perceptual segregation of concurrent vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[111] S. A. Shamma. The Auditory Processing of Speech. , 1986 .
[112] Bertrand Delgutte,et al. Representation of speech-like sounds in the discharge patterns of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979 .
[113] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[114] P F Assmann,et al. Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[115] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[116] B C Moore,et al. The influence of extraneous sounds on the perceptual estimation of first-formant frequency in vowels. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[117] Sieb G. Nooteboom. Perceptual confusions among Dutch vowels presented in noise , 1968 .
[118] R Plomp,et al. Objective analysis versus subjective assessment of vowels pronounced by native, non-native, and deaf male speakers of Dutch. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[119] Q Summerfield,et al. The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[120] D. Dirks,et al. Effect of pulsed masking on selected speech materials. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[121] R. B. Gardner,et al. Perceptual grouping of formants with static and dynamic differences in fundamental frequency , 1989 .
[122] H. Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech and Its Relation to Telephony , 1950 .
[123] B. Delgutte,et al. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.
[124] D. Klatt. Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .
[125] COLIN CHERRY,et al. Speech Communication in Very Noisy Environments , 1967, Nature.
[126] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[127] T. Houtgast. Psychophysical evidence for lateral inhibition in hearing. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[128] D D Dirks,et al. Application of the Articulation Index and the Speech Transmission Index to the recognition of speech by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[129] L E Humes,et al. Further validation of the Speech Transmission Index (STI). , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[130] J. Moncur,et al. Binaural and monaural speech intelligibility in reverberation. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[131] H. J. M. Steeneken,et al. Place Dependence of Timbre in Reverberant Sound Fields , 1973 .
[132] J. Blauert. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization , 1983 .
[133] G. Altmann. Cognitive models of speech processing , 1991 .
[134] Sid P. Bacon,et al. Factors influencing temporal effects with notched-noise maskers , 1992, Hearing Research.
[135] Ray Meddis,et al. Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery , 1991 .
[136] K. D. Kryter. Methods for the Calculation and Use of the Articulation Index , 1962 .
[137] C Speaks,et al. Effect of a competing message on synthetic sentence identification. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[138] Jont B. Allen,et al. How do humans process and recognize speech? , 1993, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..
[139] R. J. Irwin,et al. Relations among temporal acuity, hearing loss, and the perception of speech distorted by noise and reverberation. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[140] John F. Culling,et al. Effects of simulated reverberation on the use of binaural cues and fundamental-frequency differences for separating concurrent vowels , 1994, Speech Commun..
[141] D. Pisoni,et al. Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.
[142] B. Moore,et al. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones , 1985 .
[143] J. Culling,et al. Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: cues arising from low-frequency beating. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[144] R. Klinke,et al. HEARING — Physiological Bases and Psychophysics , 1983, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[145] Q. Summerfield,et al. Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[146] A. Nabelek,et al. Similarities of vowels in nonreverberant and reverberant fields. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[147] C W Turner,et al. The Time Course of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[148] M F Dorman,et al. Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[149] L. Braida,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[150] Q. Summerfield,et al. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: vowels with the same fundamental frequency. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[151] Keith R. Kluender,et al. Effects of glide slope, noise intensity, and noise duration on the extrapolation of FM glides through noise , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[152] Q. Summerfield. Audio-visual Speech Perception, Lipreading and Artificial Stimulation , 1983 .
[153] T D Carrell,et al. The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[154] T W Tillman,et al. Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[155] A. Treisman. VERBAL CUES, LANGUAGE, AND MEANING IN SELECTIVE ATTENTION. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.
[156] T. D. Hanley,et al. Effect of level of distracting noise upon speaking rate, duration and intensity. , 1949, The Journal of speech disorders.
[157] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[158] G. A. Miller. The masking of speech. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.
[159] H J McDermott,et al. Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy. , 1994, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[160] E. C. Cherry. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .
[161] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[162] R. Plomp,et al. Perceptual and physical space of vowel sounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[163] Q J Fu,et al. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[164] B C Moore,et al. Masking patterns for synthetic vowels in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[165] R Plomp,et al. The effect of linguistic entropy on speech perception in noise in young and elderly listeners. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[166] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[167] A. Nabelek,et al. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[168] A. J. Watkins. Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[169] P. Ladefoged. Three areas of experimental phonetics , 1967 .
[170] B. Moore. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing , 1987 .
[171] B Blesser,et al. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. I. Phonetic characteristics. , 1972, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[172] J M Kates. The short-time articulation index. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[173] A. Neuman,et al. Children's perception of speech in reverberation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[174] A M Simpson,et al. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.
[175] Gunnar Fant,et al. Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .
[176] M. Dorman,et al. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[177] Ilse Lehiste,et al. The Identification of Filtered Vowels , 1959 .
[178] A. Liberman,et al. An Experimental Study of the Acoustic Determinants of Vowel Color; Observations on One- and Two-Formant Vowels Synthesized from Spectrographic Patterns , 1952 .
[179] C. Darwin,et al. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[180] M. Picheny,et al. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing , 1979 .
[181] S. Rosen,et al. Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[182] A. W. F. Huggins. Temporally segmented speech , 1975 .
[183] P F Assmann,et al. Time-varying spectral change in the vowels of children and adults. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[184] T R Letowski,et al. Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[185] S. G. Nooteboom,et al. Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices , 1982 .
[186] A M Liberman,et al. Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.
[187] A. Marchal,et al. Speech production and speech modelling , 1990 .
[188] Mark Haggard,et al. Temporal Patterning in Speech: The Implications of Temporal Resolution and Signal-Processing , 1985 .
[189] L. Bernstein,et al. Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[190] K D KRYTER,et al. The effects of noise on man. , 1959 .
[191] D. Howes. On the Relation between the Intelligibility and Frequency of Occurrence of English Words , 1957 .
[192] C M Rankovic. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[193] R J Stubbs,et al. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio, signal periodicity, and degree of hearing impairment on the performance of voice-separation algorithms. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[194] Norman J. Lass,et al. Principles of Experimental Phonetics , 1996 .
[195] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[196] D D Dirks,et al. The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[197] S. Arlinger,et al. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[198] L. Chistovich,et al. The ‘center of gravity’ effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli , 1979, Hearing Research.
[199] M. Schouten. The auditory processing of speech : from sounds to words , 1992 .
[200] Steven Greenberg,et al. UNDERSTANDING SPEECH UNDERSTANDING: TOWARDS A UNIFIED THEORY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION , 1996 .
[201] R F Job,et al. Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[202] M. D. Wang,et al. Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[203] S. Gelfand,et al. Effects of small room reverberation upon the recognition of some consonant features , 1979 .
[204] David B. Pisoni,et al. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken words , 1991 .
[205] A. Treisman. Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .
[206] T. Yin,et al. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.
[207] L D Braida,et al. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[208] B. Moore. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage , 1995 .
[209] C. Darwin. Perceiving vowels in the presence of another sound: constraints on formant perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[210] J. Culling,et al. Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[211] Peter F. Assmann,et al. Auditory Enhancement in Speech Perception , 1987 .
[212] R. P. Fahey,et al. Perception of back vowels: effects of varying F1 - F0 Bark distance. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[213] J R Dubno,et al. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[214] B. Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise , 1993 .
[215] D B Pisoni,et al. Effects of cognitive workload on speech production: acoustic analyses and perceptual consequences. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[216] C. Turner,et al. The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[217] J M Festen. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[218] G. A. Miller. The Perception of Speech. , 1951 .
[219] E. Carterette,et al. Some Factors Affecting Multi‐Channel Listening , 1954 .
[220] Björn Lindblom,et al. Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .
[221] S Hawkins,et al. The influence of spectral prominence on perceived vowel quality. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[222] David B. Pisoni,et al. Some acoustic-phonetic correlates of speech produced in noise , 1985, ICASSP '85. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[223] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. THE INFLUENCE OF EXTRANEOUS SOUNDS ON THE PERCEPTUAL ESTIMATION OF FIRST-FORMANT FREQUENCY IN VOWELS UNDER CONDITIONS OF ASYNCHRONY , 1991 .
[224] L. F. Willems,et al. Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[225] P F Assmann. The role of formant transitions in the perception of concurrent vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[226] Gerald A Studebaker,et al. Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[227] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[228] Alan R. Palmer,et al. Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing , 1998 .
[229] Bertrand Delgutte,et al. Auditory Neural Processing of Speech , 2002 .
[230] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[231] C V Pavlovic,et al. A frequency importance function for continuous discourse. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[232] S. S. Stevens,et al. Handbook of experimental psychology , 1951 .
[233] R W Hukin,et al. Perceptual segregation of a harmonic from a vowel by interaural time difference in conjunction with mistuning and onset asynchrony. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[234] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Validation of the revised STIr method , 2002, Speech Commun..
[235] L D Braida,et al. Single Band Amplitude Envelope Cues as an Aid to Speechreading , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[236] A K Nábĕlek,et al. Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[237] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[238] C Ludvigsen. Prediction of speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and cochlearly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[239] J. Bird. Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences. , 1997 .
[240] J M Festen,et al. Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[241] R Meddis,et al. Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[242] G. L. Powers,et al. Intelligibility of temporally interrupted speech with and without intervening noise , 1973 .
[243] R. M. Warren. Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.
[244] H. K. Dunn,et al. Statistical Measurements on Conversational Speech , 1940 .
[245] T. M. Nearey,et al. Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[246] R Drullman,et al. Speech intelligibility in noise: relative contribution of speech elements above and below the noise level. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[247] J. Culling,et al. Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[248] Gerald Langner,et al. Periodicity coding in the auditory system , 1992, Hearing Research.
[249] Stuart Rosen,et al. Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants , 1997 .
[250] David Kirby,et al. Perceptual compensation for transmission channel and speaker effects on vowel quality , 1989, Speech Commun..
[251] T. Houtgast,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .
[252] H. Dillon,et al. An international comparison of long‐term average speech spectra , 1994 .
[253] Neal F. Viemeister,et al. Adaptation of Masking , 1980 .
[254] J. M. Ackroff,et al. Auditory Induction: Perceptual Synthesis of Absent Sounds , 1972, Science.
[255] A S Bregman,et al. Perceived continuity of gliding and steady-state tones through interrupting noise , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[256] Yifan Gong,et al. Speech recognition in noisy environments: A survey , 1995, Speech Commun..
[257] R Plomp,et al. The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[258] D D Dirks,et al. Masking effects of speech competing messages. , 1969, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[259] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[260] Alan R. Palmer,et al. Chapter 3 – Neural Signal Processing , 1995 .
[261] B. Moore,et al. Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[262] J. Junqua,et al. Acoustic and perceptual studies of Lombard speech: application to isolated-words automatic speech recognition , 1990, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
[263] S. McAdams. Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[264] A. Nabelek,et al. Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[265] L D Braida,et al. Auditory supplements to speechreading: combining amplitude envelope cues from different spectral regions of speech. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[266] S McAdams,et al. Identification of concurrent harmonic and inharmonic vowels: a test of the theory of harmonic cancellation and enhancement. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[267] Q Summerfield,et al. Minimal spectral contrast of formant peaks for vowel recognition as a function of spectral slope , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[268] T Houtgast,et al. Peaks in the frequency response of hearing aids: evaluation of the effects on speech intelligibility and sound quality. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[269] H Müsch,et al. Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. II. Measurement and prediction of consonant-discrimination performance. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[270] Harvey b. Fletcher,et al. Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .
[271] L. Rabiner,et al. Predicting binaural gain in intelligibility and release from masking for speech. , 1967, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[272] M. E. H. Schouten,et al. The psychophysics of speech perception , 1987 .
[273] L. A. Chistovich. Central auditory processing of peripheral vowel spectra. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[274] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Access and integration: projecting sound onto meaning , 1989 .
[275] R. M. Warren,et al. Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[276] Daniel P. W. Ellis,et al. The auditory organization of speech and other sources in listeners and computational models , 2001, Speech Commun..
[277] B C Moore,et al. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[278] A K Nábĕlek,et al. Cues for perception of the diphthong /aI/ in either noise or reverberation. Part I. Duration of the transition. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[279] Milan Vego,et al. Center of Gravity , 2000 .
[280] Axel Michelsen,et al. Time Resolution in Auditory Systems , 1985, Proceedings in Life Sciences.
[281] J. B. Pickering,et al. Vowel Perception and Production , 1994 .
[282] J Verschuure,et al. Intelligibility of interrupted meaningful and nonsense speech with and without intervening noise , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[283] A R Palmer,et al. Responses of auditory-nerve fibers to stimuli producing psychophysical enhancement. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[284] H. Lane. Psychophysical parameters of vowel perception. , 1962 .
[285] G. A. Miller,et al. The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.
[286] H. Lane,et al. The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .
[287] Sharlene A. Liu,et al. Landmark detection for distinctive feature-based speech recognition , 1996 .
[288] K N Stevens. ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES USED FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF SPEECH SOUNDS a , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[289] B. Moore,et al. Evaluation of a method of simulating reduced frequency selectivity. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[290] Q Summerfield,et al. Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra: Phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[291] John E. Markel,et al. Linear Prediction of Speech , 1976, Communication and Cybernetics.
[292] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[293] L.L. Beranek,et al. The Design of Speech Communication Systems , 1947, Proceedings of the IRE.
[294] R Plomp,et al. The effect of a hearing aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[295] R B Gardner,et al. Mistuning a harmonic of a vowel: grouping and phase effects on vowel quality. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[296] R. L. Wegel,et al. The Auditory Masking of One Pure Tone by Another and its Probable Relation to the Dynamics of the Inner Ear , 1924 .
[297] S. S. Stevens,et al. The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .
[298] A. Boothroyd,et al. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[299] D Kewley-Port,et al. Modeling formant frequency discrimination of female vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[300] T. Houtgast,et al. A review of the MTF concept in room acoustics and its use for estimating speech intelligibility in auditoria , 1985 .
[301] I M Noordhoek,et al. Effect of reducing temporal intensity modulations on sentence intelligibility. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[302] W M Hartmann,et al. Pitch, periodicity, and auditory organization. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[303] A. J. Watkins,et al. Perceptual compensation for speaker differences and for spectral-envelope distortion. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[304] J. M. Pickett,et al. Perception of Vowels Heard in Noises of Various Spectra , 1957 .
[305] Claude E. Shannon,et al. Prediction and Entropy of Printed English , 1951 .
[306] C. E. SHANNON,et al. A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.
[307] B. Moore,et al. Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[308] R. H. Bernacki,et al. Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[309] J. Hillenbrand,et al. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[310] Harvey Fletcher,et al. The Perception of Speech Sounds by Deafened Persons , 1952 .
[311] C W Turner,et al. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[312] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .
[313] J. Laver,et al. The handbook of phonetic sciences , 1999 .
[314] P F Assmann,et al. Perception of front vowels: the role of harmonics in the first formant region. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[315] S Buus,et al. Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[316] B C Moore,et al. Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.