A Simulator-Based Approach to Assess Take-over Performance in a Conditionally Automated Vehicle

The interaction between the driver and the automated driving systems (ADS) will remain a key element of automated driving because drivers are expected to be available to take over control for the case of system failure or limitation in a conditionally automated vehicle, i.e. SAE level 3. A number of studies reported that various factors such as the time budget, the traffic complexity, and the driver’s inattention may influence take-over time and quality. Therefore, the driver’s take-over performance must be carefully analyzed to ensure a safe transition. This study aims to propose a take-over performance assessment method using a driving simulator. A systematic review was conducted to design a driving scenario for unintended take-over events. As a result, a take-over performance test protocol with four take-over situations such as missing lines on a straight and a curved road, road construction, and system failure was designed. Visual and cognitive non-driving related tasks, which influence a driver’s situation awareness and take-over performance, were also considered. It will be proposed as Korean Traffic Safety Regulation to assess the safety of the take-over control in a conditionally automated vehicle from the perspective of the driver.

[1]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers’ Takeover Performance and Automation Trust , 2017, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle , 2014 .

[3]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Driver Inattention During Vehicle Automation: How Does Driver Engagement Affect Resumption Of Control? , 2015 .

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving , 2014 .

[6]  Yonghwan Jeong,et al.  Safety Performance Evaluation Scenarios for Extraordinary Service Permission of Autonomous Vehicle , 2016 .

[7]  Alexandra Neukum,et al.  Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Joonwoo Son,et al.  Situation Awareness and Transitions in Highly Automated Driving:A Framework and Mini Review , 2017 .

[10]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Situation Awareness, Scenarios, and Secondary Tasks: Measuring Driver Performance and Safety Margins in Highly Automated Vehicles , 2016 .

[11]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Ready for Take-Over? A New Driver Assistance System for an Automated Classification of Driver Take-Over Readiness , 2017 .

[12]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Alexandra Neukum,et al.  Driving performance at lateral system limits during partially automated driving. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Tobias Vogelpohl,et al.  Takeover Times in Highly Automated Driving (Level 3) , 2017 .

[15]  Riender Happee,et al.  Human factors of transitions in automated driving: A general framework and literature survey , 2016 .

[16]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Engaging with Highly Automated Driving: To be or Not to be in the Loop? , 2017 .

[17]  Grant Reagon Son,et al.  Determining the Importance of Coaching Methods in Workplace Health and Safety , 2017 .

[18]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Frederik Diederichs,et al.  Take-Over Requests for Automated Driving , 2015 .

[20]  Jing Feng,et al.  Age differences in the takeover of vehicle control and engagement in non-driving-related activities in simulated driving with conditional automation. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles , 2022 .

[22]  Stephen M. Casner,et al.  The challenges of partially automated driving , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  Why is steering not the same as braking? The impact of non-driving related tasks on lateral and longitudinal driver interventions during conditionally automated driving , 2017 .

[24]  Lutz Lorenz,et al.  Designing take over scenarios for automated driving , 2014 .

[25]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[27]  Riender Happee,et al.  Take-over performance in evasive manoeuvres. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.