Models for Paired Comparison Data: A Review with Emphasis on Dependent Data
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] U Böckenholt,et al. Individual differences in paired comparison data. , 2001, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[2] B. Francis,et al. Modeling heterogeneity in ranked responses by nonparametric maximum likelihood: How do Europeans get their scientific knowledge? , 2010, 1101.1425.
[3] R. Tsai,et al. Remarks on the identifiability of thurstonian ranking models: Case V, case III, or neither? , 2000 .
[4] Rainer Schwabe,et al. Optimal design for the Bradley–Terry paired comparison model , 2008, Stat. Methods Appl..
[5] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. , 2005, Psychological methods.
[6] Harry Joe,et al. A General Family of Limited Information Goodness-of-Fit Statistics for Multinomial Data , 2010 .
[7] Sylvain Choisel,et al. Evaluation of multichannel reproduced sound: scaling auditory attributes underlying listener preference. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. On the importance of distinguishing between within- and between-subject effects in intransitive intertemporal choice , 2008 .
[9] K. Bäuml,et al. Effects of the beholder's age on the perception of facial attractiveness. , 2000, Acta psychologica.
[10] David Firth,et al. Bradley-Terry Models in R: The BradleyTerry2 Package , 2012 .
[11] David Causeur,et al. A 2-dimensional extension of the Bradley–Terry model for paired comparisons , 2005 .
[12] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: identifying the scale origin. , 2004, Psychological methods.
[13] D. Culler,et al. Comparison of methods , 2000 .
[14] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[15] Regina Dittrich,et al. Modelling dependencies in paired comparison data a log-linear approach , 2002 .
[16] Peter Goos,et al. Optimal design of factorial paired comparison experiments in the presence of within-pair order effects , 2011 .
[17] David Firth,et al. Generalized nonlinear models in R: An overview of the gnm package , 2007 .
[18] William R. Dillon,et al. Capturing Individual Differences in Paired Comparisons: An Extended BTL Model Incorporating Descriptor Variables , 1993 .
[19] L. V. Jones,et al. The Rational Origin for Measuring Subjective Values , 1957 .
[20] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. A logistic representation of multivariate paired-comparison models , 1988 .
[21] H. Joe,et al. Composite likelihood estimation in multivariate data analysis , 2005 .
[22] Suzanne Winsberg,et al. A thurstonian pairwise choice model with univariate and multivariate spline transformations , 1993 .
[23] J. C. van Houwelingen,et al. Logistic Regression for Correlated Binary Data , 1994 .
[24] Yoshio Takane,et al. Analysis of Covariance Structures and Probabilistic Binary Choice Data , 1989 .
[25] R. A. Bradley,et al. RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS , 1952 .
[26] E. Zermelo. Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , 1929 .
[27] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. A Thurstonian analysis of preference change , 2002 .
[28] Daniel Barry,et al. Choice models for predicting divisional winners in major league baseball , 1993 .
[29] H. A. David,et al. The Method of Paired Comparisons (2nd ed.). , 1989 .
[30] D. Hunter. MM algorithms for generalized Bradley-Terry models , 2003 .
[31] Achim Zeileis,et al. Accounting for Individual Differences in Bradley-Terry Models by Means of Recursive Partitioning , 2011 .
[32] Frank Bretz,et al. Comparison of Methods for the Computation of Multivariate t Probabilities , 2002 .
[33] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. 14 Random-Effects Models for Preference Data , 2006 .
[34] L. Knorr‐Held. Dynamic Rating of Sports Teams , 2000 .
[35] Joan L. Walker,et al. Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..
[36] B. Muthén. Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables , 1978 .
[37] S. Chib,et al. Analysis of multivariate probit models , 1998 .
[38] David Mease,et al. A Penalized Maximum Likelihood Approach for the Ranking of College Football Teams Independent of Victory Margins , 2003 .
[39] Chih-Jen Lin,et al. Generalized Bradley-Terry Models and Multi-Class Probability Estimates , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[40] R. Henery,et al. An extension to the Thurstone-Mosteller model for chess , 1992 .
[41] D. Quade,et al. Random effects in paired-comparison experiments using the Bradley-Terry model. , 1983, Biometrics.
[42] P. V. Rao,et al. Ties in Paired-Comparison Experiments: A Generalization of the Bradley-Terry Model , 1967 .
[43] C. Varin,et al. Dynamic Bradley–Terry modelling of sports tournaments , 2013 .
[44] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities , 2006, Psychometrika.
[45] Regina Dittrich,et al. Analysing partial ranks by using smoothed paired comparison methods: an investigation of value orientation in Europe , 2002 .
[46] D. Curtis,et al. An extended transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT) for multi‐allele marker loci , 1995, Annals of human genetics.
[47] B. Muthén,et al. Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes , 1997 .
[48] Albert Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling , 2001 .
[49] R. Davidson. On Extending the Bradley-Terry Model to Accommodate Ties in Paired Comparison Experiments , 1970 .
[50] J. Kent. Robust properties of likelihood ratio tests , 1982 .
[51] David Firth,et al. Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[52] R. Duncan Luce,et al. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .
[53] H. Joe,et al. Limited-and Full-Information Estimation and Goodness-ofFit Testing in 2 n Contingency Tables : A Unified Framework , 2005 .
[54] D. Firth. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates , 1993 .
[55] Harry Joe,et al. Limited Information Goodness-of-Fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 2005 .
[56] C. Sinclair,et al. GLIM for Preference , 1982 .
[57] R. A. Bradley,et al. RANK ANALYSIS OF INCOMPLETE BLOCK DESIGNS THE METHOD OF PAIRED COMPARISONS , 1952 .
[58] Harry Joe,et al. Extended Use of Paired Comparison Models, with Application to Chess Rankings , 1990 .
[59] L. R. Ford. Solution of a Ranking Problem from Binary Comparisons , 1957 .
[60] Yi-Ching Yao,et al. Asymptotics when the number of parameters tends to infinity in the Bradley-Terry model for paired comparisons , 1999 .
[61] S. Stigler. Citation Patterns in the Journals of Statistics and Probability , 1994 .
[62] U Böckenholt. Hierarchical modeling of paired comparison data. , 2001, Psychological methods.
[63] D. Cox,et al. A note on pseudolikelihood constructed from marginal densities , 2004 .
[64] Albert Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Limited Information Goodness-of-fit Testing in Multidimensional Contingency Tables , 2005 .
[65] Christian Schmid,et al. A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[66] Albert Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Limited Information Estimation and Testing of Discretized Multivariate Normal Structural Models , 2003 .
[67] F. Mosteller,et al. Remarks on the method of paired comparisons: III. A test of significance for paired comparisons when equal standard deviations and equal correlations are assumed , 1951, Psychometrika.
[68] David Firth,et al. Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[69] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data , 1997 .
[70] Tony R. Martinez,et al. A Bradley–Terry artificial neural network model for individual ratings in group competitions , 2008, Neural Computing and Applications.
[71] Alberto Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Identification and Small Sample Estimation of Thurstone's Unrestricted Model for Paired Comparisons Data , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.
[72] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Thresholds and Intransitivities in Pairwise Judgments: A Multilevel Analysis , 2001 .
[73] Manuela Cattelan. Correlation models for paired comparison data , 2009 .
[74] A. Springall,et al. Response Surface Fitting Using a Generalization of the Bradley‐Terry Paired Comparison Model , 1973 .
[75] Wolfgang Ellermeier,et al. Scaling the Unpleasantness of Sounds According to the BTL Model: Ratio-Scale Representation and Psychoacoustical Analysis , 2004 .
[76] Heinz Holling,et al. Optimal designs for main effects in linear paired comparison models , 2004 .
[77] L. Thurstone. A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .
[78] Anthony J. Hayter,et al. The evaluation of general non‐centred orthant probabilities , 2003 .
[79] Roger R. Davidson,et al. A Bibliography on the Method of Paired Comparisons , 1973 .
[80] H. A. David,et al. Ties in Paired-Comparison Experiments Using a Modified Thurstone-Mosteller Model , 1960 .
[81] G. Molenberghs,et al. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data , 2005 .
[82] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach , 2006 .
[83] Brian Francis,et al. Modelling dependency in multivariate paired comparisons: A log-linear approach , 2006, Math. Soc. Sci..
[84] Alan Agresti,et al. Analysis of Ordinal Paired Comparison Data , 1992 .
[85] K. Bäuml,et al. Upright versus upside-down faces: How interface attractiveness varies with orientation , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[86] Ian G. McHale,et al. A Bradley-Terry type model for forecasting tennis match results , 2011 .
[87] K. Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .
[88] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Two-level linear paired comparison models: estimation and identifiability issues , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..
[89] Hal S. Stern,et al. A continuum of paired comparisons models , 1990 .
[90] N. Breslow,et al. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models , 1993 .
[91] Thomas A. Mazzuchi,et al. A paired comparison experiment for gathering expert judgment for an aircraft wiring risk assessment , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[92] Walter Katzenbeisser,et al. A log-linear approach for modelling ordinal paired comparison data on motives to start a PhD programme , 2004 .
[93] Megan L. Head,et al. Chemical mediation of reciprocal mother-offspring recognition in the Southern Water Skink (Eulamprus heatwolei) , 2008 .
[94] C.A.A. Duineveld,et al. Log-linear modelling of paired comparison data from consumer tests , 2000 .
[95] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Modeling subjective health outcomes: top 10 reasons to use Thurstone's method. , 2008, Medical care.
[96] R. Tsai,et al. Remarks on the identifiability of thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment , 2003 .
[97] Ulf Böckenholt,et al. Some New Methods for an Old Problem: Modeling Preference Changes and Competitive Market Structures in Pretest Market Data: , 1997 .
[98] Albert Maydeu-Olivares. Thurstonian covariance and correlation structures for multiple judgment paired comparison data , 2001 .
[99] Peter S. Craig,et al. A new reconstruction of multivariate normal orthant probabilities , 2007 .
[100] Steven Stern,et al. Moderated paired comparisons: a generalized Bradley–Terry model for continuous data using a discontinuous penalized likelihood function , 2011 .
[101] A. Tversky. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .
[102] J. Marschak. Binary Choice Constraints on Random Utility Indicators , 1959 .
[103] L. Fahrmeir,et al. Dynamic Stochastic Models for Time-Dependent Ordered Paired Comparison Systems , 1994 .
[104] Satoshi Usami,et al. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES MULTIDIMENSIONAL BRADLEY-TERRY MODEL USING REVERSIBLE JUMP MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO ALGORITHM , 2010 .
[105] Mark E. Glickman,et al. Dynamic paired comparison models with stochastic variances , 2001 .
[106] N. Reid,et al. AN OVERVIEW OF COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD METHODS , 2011 .
[107] D. Firth. Bradley-Terry Models in R , 2005 .
[108] Albert Maydeu-Olivares,et al. Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for preference data , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..
[109] Mark Reiser,et al. Goodness-of-fit testing using components based on marginal frequencies of multinomial data. , 2008, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.
[110] Carolyn Hicks,et al. Designing sexual health services for young people: a methodology for capturing the user voice. , 2009, Health & social care in the community.
[111] R A Bradley. Science, statistics, and paired comparisons. , 1976, Biometrics.
[112] J. Douglas Carroll,et al. Toward a new paradigm for the study of multiattribute choice behavior: Spatial and discrete modeling of pairwise preferences. , 1991 .
[113] Regina Dittrich,et al. Missing observations in paired comparison data , 2012 .
[114] Reinhold Hatzinger,et al. Fitting paired comparison models in R. , 2004 .
[115] Harry Joe,et al. Composite Likelihood Methods , 2012 .
[116] Jinfeng Xu,et al. GROUPED SPARSE PAIRED COMPARISONS IN THE BRADLEY-TERRY MODEL , 2011, 1111.5110.
[117] Subhash R. Lele,et al. Estimability and Likelihood Inference for Generalized Linear Mixed Models Using Data Cloning , 2010 .
[118] J. Matthews,et al. An application of Bradley-Terry-type models to the measurement of pain , 1995 .
[119] Regina Dittrich,et al. A paired comparison approach for the analysis of sets of Likert-scale responses , 2007 .
[120] Regina Dittrich,et al. Modelling the effect of subject‐specific covariates in paired comparison studies with an application to university rankings , 2001 .
[121] Brian Francis,et al. WU Institutional Repository , 2018 .