Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Notification of Prize Draw Results on Response Behavior in Web Surveys

Many online surveys offer the chance to win prizes as a primary incentive for respondents. One researcher found that prepaid monetary incentives were the most effective technique for increasing response rates, however, other researchers showed that a prize incentive outperformed other incentive types in a web-based survey. Using the immediacy effect and supporting theories as a base, this study extends the research on using prize draws as an effective incentive for web surveys by investigating the effects of immediate versus delayed notification for prize draw winners. Results indicate that the immediate notification of prize draw results did significantly increase response rates to the survey over the delayed notification, receipt of results, and control groups.

[1]  G. Stigler.  The Development of Utility Theory. I , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Decision making over time and under uncertainty: a common approach , 1991 .

[3]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Classifying Response Behaviors in Web-based Surveys , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  G. Loewenstein.  Frames of mind in intertemporal choice , 1988 .

[5]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[6]  William C. Gaidis,et al.  Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions , 1981 .

[7]  Tracy L. Tuten,et al.  Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys: an experiment , 2003 .

[8]  M. Birnbaum.  A Web-Based Program of Research on Decision Making , 2001 .

[9]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Utility maximization and melioration: Internalities in individual choice , 1993 .

[10]  Mathew Parackal,et al.  Survey-Based Experimental Research via the Web: Some Observations , 1999 .

[11]  R. Herrnstein.  Rational Choice Theory Necessary but Not Sufficient , 1990 .

[12]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review , 2002 .

[13]  Joseph G. P. Paolillo,et al.  Monetary Incentives and Mail Questionnaire Response Rates , 1984 .

[14]  G. Loewenstein.  Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption , 1987 .

[15]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Mixing virtue and vice: combining the immediacy effect and the diversification heuristic , 1999 .

[16]  A. H. Church.  ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF INCENTIVES ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[17]  P. Samuelson.  A Note on Measurement of Utility , 1937 .

[18]  J. Hackler,et al.  DOLLARS, DISSONANCE, AND SURVEY RETURNS , 1973 .

[19]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives of Intertemporal Choice , 2003 .

[20]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips,et al.  Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Drop Out in Online Studies , 2001 .

[21]  W. Diamond,et al.  The Framing of Sales Promotions: an Approach to Classification , 1990 .

[22]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Melioration: A Theory of Distributed Choice , 1991 .