Measuring the presampled MTF from a reduced number of flat-field images using the noise response (NR) method

We evaluate a new method for measuring the presampled modulation transfer function (MTF) using the noise power spectrum (NPS) obtained from a few flat-field images acquired at one exposure level. The NPS is the sum of structure, quantum, and additive instrumentation noise, which are proportional to exposure squared, exposure, and a constant, respectively, with the spatial-frequency dependence of the quantum noise depending partly on the detector MTF. Cascaded linear-systems theory was used to derive an exact and generic relationship that was used to isolate noise terms and enable determination of the MTF directly from the noise response, thereby circumventing the need for precision test objects (slit, edge, etc.) as required by standard techniques. Isolation of the quantum NPS by fitting the total NPS versus exposure obtained using 30 flat-field images each at six or more different exposure levels with a linear regression provides highly accurate MTFs. A subset of these images from indirect digital detectors was used to investigate the accuracy of measuring the MTF from 30 or fewer flat-field images obtained at a single exposure level. Analyzing as few as two images acquired at a single exposure resulted in no observable systematic error. Increasing the number of images analyzed resulted in an increase in accuracy. Fifteen images provided comparable accuracy with the most rigorous slope approach, with less than 5% variability, suggesting additional image acquisitions may be unnecessary. Reducing the number of images acquired for the noise response method further simplifies and facilitates routine MTF measurements.

[1]  Ian A. Cunningham.  Use of the detective quantum efficiency in a quality assurance program , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Component analysis of a new solid state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII) using photon transfer and instrumentation noise equivalent exposure (INEE) measurements , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  Ulrich Neitzel,et al.  Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[6]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  The solid state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII): an EMCCD-based x-ray detector , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  G. Boreman.  Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[10]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: Frequency-dependent Swank noise. , 2008, Medical physics.

[11]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  The solid state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII) in single photon counting (SPC) mode , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Singular value description of a digital radiographic detector: theory and measurements. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[14]  Ulrich Neitzel,et al.  Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. , 2003, Medical physics.

[15]  P. Greer,et al.  Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Progress in electron-multiplying CCD (EMCCD) based high-resolution high-sensitivity x-ray detector for fluoroscopy and radiography , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Normalization of the modulation transfer function: the open-field approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[18]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[19]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[20]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors. , 2007, Medical physics.