Motor Equivalent Strategies in the Production of German /∫/ under Perturbation

The German sibilant /∫/ is produced with a constriction in the postalveolar region and often with protruded lips. By covarying horizontal lip and tongue position speakers can keep a similar acoustic output even if the articulation varies. This study investigates whether during two weeks of adaptation to an artificial palate speakers covary these two articulatory parameters, whether tactile landmarks have an influence on the covariation and to what extent speakers can foresee the acoustic result of the covariation without auditory feedback. Six German speakers were recorded with EMA. Four of them showed a covariation of lip and tongue, which is consistent with the motor equivalence hypothesis. The acoustic output, however, does not stay entirely constant but varies with the tongue position. The role of tactile landmarks is negligible. To a certain extent, speakers are able to adapt even without auditory feedback.

[1]  F. Guenther,et al.  A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. , 1998, Psychological review.

[2]  D H McFarland,et al.  Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  P. Delattre,et al.  A DIALECT STUDY OF AMERICAN R’S BY X-RAY MOTION PICTURE , 1968 .

[4]  Mary J. Lindstrom,et al.  Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/ , 1998, Speech Commun..

[5]  Suzanne Boyce,et al.  A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Gunnar Fant,et al.  Acoustic Theory Of Speech Production , 1960 .

[7]  P. Perrier,et al.  Adaptation strategies in perturbed /s/ , 2011, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[8]  Kiyoshi Honda,et al.  Automaticity vs. feature-enhancement in the control of segmental F0 , 2011 .

[9]  James Lubker,et al.  Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predict , 1977 .

[10]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J. Folkins,et al.  Lip and jaw interaction during speech: responses to perturbation of lower-lip movement prior to bilabial closure. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  W. Hardcastle,et al.  A perceptual and electropalatographic study of /∫/ in young people with Down's syndrome , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[13]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip-tube : A study of the control space in speech production , 1995 .

[14]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  Articulatory-Acoustic Relationships in Fricative Consonants , 1990 .

[15]  Anil K. Jain.  Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing , 2018, Control of Color Imaging Systems.

[16]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: a pilot "motor equivalence" study. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  J A Kelso,et al.  "Compensatory articulation" under conditions of reduced afferent information: a dynamic formulation. , 1983, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  The quantification of place of articulation assimilation in electropalatographic data using the similarity index (SI) , 2007 .

[19]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  Neural control of speech movements , 2002 .

[20]  R. S. Waldstein,et al.  Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  P. Hoole,et al.  Jaw and Order , 2007, Language and speech.

[22]  Frank H. Guenther,et al.  A neural network model of speech acquisition and motor equivalent speech production , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  P Perrier,et al.  Compensation strategies for the perturbation of French [u] using a lip tube. II. Perceptual analysis. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  J. Scobbie,et al.  The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English , 2011 .

[25]  M. Stone,et al.  Compensatory alveolar consonant production induced by wearing a dental prosthesis , 1978 .

[26]  Michael I. Jordan.  Computational aspects of motor control and motor learning , 2008 .

[27]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Rafael Laboissière.  Préliminaires pour une robotique de la communication parlée : inversion et contrôle d'un modèle articulatoire du conduit vocal , 1992 .

[29]  J. Perkell,et al.  The distinctness of speakers' productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  A Löfqvist,et al.  The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Khalil Iskarous,et al.  Mechanical Models of Fricatives Based on MRI-derived Vocal Tract Shapes , 2008 .

[32]  B. Murdoch,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual analysis of speech adaptation to an artificial palate , 2007, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[33]  Mary J Lindstrom,et al.  Tongues and lips without jaws: a comparison of methods for decoupling speech movements. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[34]  W. Hardcastle,et al.  Electropalatographic therapy for children and young people with Down's syndrome , 2009, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[35]  Jeffery A. Jones,et al.  Learning to produce speech with an altered vocal tract: the role of auditory feedback. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Abbs,et al.  Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[37]  G. Schulz,et al.  Speech motor learning: preliminary data , 2001, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[38]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The influence of auditory acuity on acoustic variability and the use of motor equivalence during adaptation to a perturbation. , 2011, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.

[39]  Influence of a Standard Electropalatography Artificial Palate Upon Articulation , 2008, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[40]  Masaaki Honda,et al.  Compensatory responses of articulators to unexpected perturbation of the palate shape , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[41]  Pascal Perrier,et al.  A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[42]  P. Hoole,et al.  BITE-BLOCK SPEECH IN THE ABSENCE OF ORAL SENSIBILITY , 2001 .

[43]  Christine H. Shadle,et al.  The acoustics of fricative consonants , 1986 .

[44]  F H Guenther,et al.  Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. , 1995, Psychological review.

[45]  C. Espy-Wilson,et al.  Acoustic cues of ‘‘retroflex’’ and ‘‘bunched’’ American English rhotic sound , 2007 .