The Roles of Perceived Identity Compatibility and Social Support for Women in a Single-Sex STEM Program at a Co-educational University

Single-sex programs have been implemented in a variety of educational settings to help promote greater engagement of women in STEM fields. However, the mechanisms through which single-sex programs increase women’s engagement in STEM fields are unclear. Drawing from research in social and health psychology, we examined two theoretically-guided predictors of women’s sense of belonging in their STEM majors and belonging at the university: perceived identity compatibility between being a woman and being in a STEM field, and perceived social support. Participants were 65 racially, ethnically, and socioeconomically diverse women enrolled in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university in Northeastern United States. Participants completed online surveys before the start of their first year of college, and again at the beginning of their second year of college. Findings from multiple regression analyses support hypotheses that across STEM women’s first or transitional year of college, perceived identity compatibility, perceived support from close others, and perceived support from the single-sex program for STEM women were each independently associated with greater sense of belonging in their major. Additionally, perceived identity compatibility and perceived support from the single-sex program were associated with greater sense of belonging at the university. These findings suggest that perceived support from sources such as single-sex programs and perceived compatibility between one’s field and being female may sustain women pursuing training in nontraditional fields such as STEM. Continued investigation of these factors may elucidate the impact of single-sex programs and inform interventions to increase the retention of women in STEM.

[1]  J. Blickenstaff.  Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .

[2]  C. Goodenow.  The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates , 1993 .

[3]  J. Eccles.  Subjective Task Value and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. , 2005 .

[4]  Alan Smithers,et al.  THE PARADOX OF SINGLE-SEX AND CO-EDUCATIONAL SCHOOLING , 2018 .

[5]  Maria M. Ferreira.  Gender issues related to graduate student attrition in two science departments , 2003 .

[6]  S. Wenzel,et al.  WOMEN GRADUATE STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS: REFLECTIONS ON SUCCESS , 1994 .

[7]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[8]  Sheri R. Levy,et al.  Lay theories and intergroup relations: A social-developmental perspective , 2005 .

[9]  A. Elliot,et al.  Handbook of Competence and Motivation , 2013 .

[10]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Navigating the Future: Social Identity, Coping, and Life Tasks , 2006 .

[11]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Social Identity Complexity , 2002 .

[12]  S. Phillips,et al.  Academic Gender Bias and Women's Behavioral Agency Self‐Efficacy , 1996 .

[13]  H. Tajfel.  Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations , 1982 .

[14]  Paula Maurutto,et al.  Beyond Access: Considering Gender Deficits in Science Education. , 1998 .

[15]  What's sex got to do with it? , 2003, Time.

[16]  Barbara A. Greene,et al.  The Relations Between Student Motivational Beliefs and Cognitive Engagement in High School , 2009 .

[17]  C. Midgley,et al.  Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[18]  K. Osterman.  Students' Need for Belonging in the School Community , 2000 .

[19]  Susan L. Murray,et al.  WHY AREN'T THERE MORE WOMEN ENGINEERS? , 1999 .

[20]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[21]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[22]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Student solutions manual for Kleinbaum, Kupper, Muller and Nizam's Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods , 1998 .

[23]  Suzanne G. Brainard,et al.  A Six‐Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science * , 1998 .

[24]  N. Garmezy.  Resiliency and Vulnerability to Adverse Developmental Outcomes Associated With Poverty , 1991 .

[25]  Susan M. Barnett,et al.  Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  Irwin G. Sarason,et al.  Social support: An interactional view. , 1990 .

[27]  Isis H. Settles,et al.  Identification with multiple social groups: The moderating role of identity change over time among women-scientists , 2009 .

[28]  K. Deaux,et al.  Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. , 1987 .

[29]  C. Dunkel-schetter,et al.  Differentiating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of social support , 1990 .

[30]  G. Downey,et al.  Sensitivity to Status-Based Rejection: Implications for African American Students' College Experience , 2002 .

[31]  M. Warrington,et al.  The Other Side of the Gender Gap , 2000 .

[32]  Julie J. Exline,et al.  Views of the Self and Affiliation Choices: A Social Comparison Perspective , 1997 .

[33]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Single-Sex versus Secondary Schooling: A Systematic Review. , 2005 .

[34]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self , 2001 .

[35]  T. L. Gall,et al.  Transition to First-Year University: Patterns of Change in Adjustment Across Life Domains and Time , 2000 .

[36]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Where Are All the Women? Gender Differences in Participation in Physical Science and Engineering. , 2007 .

[37]  J. Ostrove,et al.  Social Class and Belonging: Implications for College Adjustment , 2007 .

[38]  D. Ruble,et al.  Social transitions: Windows into social psychological processes , 1996 .

[39]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[40]  Susan Morse,et al.  Separated by sex : a critical look at single-sex education for girls , 1998 .

[41]  M. Lobel,et al.  Stress among students , 1990 .

[42]  J. Finn.  Withdrawing From School , 1989 .

[43]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[44]  Rosalind C. Barnett,et al.  Learning in a Man's World: Examining the Perceptions of Undergraduate Women in Male-Dominated Academic Areas , 2002 .

[45]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[46]  Susan K. Dyer.  Under the Microscope: A Decade of Gender Equity Projects in the Sciences. , 2004 .

[47]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[48]  G. Downey,et al.  Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. , 2007 .

[49]  Nancy Protheroe.  Single-Sex Classrooms. , 2009 .

[50]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[51]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Single-Sex Versus Coeducational Schooling: A Systematic Review. Doc # 2005-01. , 2005 .

[52]  K. Salomone,et al.  Investigating “Sense of Belonging” in First-Year College Students , 2002 .

[53]  Geraldine Downey,et al.  Sensitivity to status-based rejection: implications for African American students' college experience. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Isis H. Settles,et al.  When Multiple Identities Interfere: The Role of Identity Centrality , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[55]  Isis H. Settles.  Use of an Intersectional Framework to Understand Black Women’s Racial and Gender Identities , 2006 .