Prosodic influences on consonant production in Dutch: Effects of prosodic boundaries, phrasal accent and lexical stress

Prosodic influences on phonetic realizations of four Dutch consonants (/t d s z/) were examined. Sentences were constructed containing these consonants in word-initial position; the factors lexical stress, phrasal accent and prosodic boundary were manipulated between sentences. Eleven Dutch speakers read these sentences aloud. The patterns found in acoustic measurements of these utterances (e.g.,voice onset time (VOT),consonant duration,voicing during closure,spectral center of gravity,burst energy) indicate that the low-level phonetic implementation of all four consonants is modulated by prosodic structure. Boundary effects on domain-initial segments were observed in stressed and unstressed syllables,extending previous findings which have been on stressed syllables alone. Three aspects of the data are highlighted. First,shorter VOTs were found for /t/ in prosodically stronger locations (stressed,accented and domaininitial),as opposed to longer VOTs in these positions in English. This suggests that prosodically driven phonetic realization is bounded by language-specific constraints on how phonetic features are specified with phonetic content: Shortened VOT in Dutch reflects enhancement of the phonetic feature {� spread glottis}, while lengthened VOT in English reflects enhancement of {+spread glottis}. Prosodic strengthening therefore appears to operate primarily at the phonetic level,such that prosodically driven enhancement of phonological contrast is determined by phonetic implementation of these (language-specific) phonetic features. Second,an accent effect was observed in stressed and unstressed syllables,and was independent of prosodic boundary size. The domain of accentuation in Dutch is thus larger than the foot. Third,within a

[1]  W. Eefting The effect of ‘‘information value’’ and ‘‘accentuation’’ on the duration of Dutch words, syllables, and segments , 1991 .

[2]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  THE PROSODIC HIERARCHY IN METER , 1989 .

[3]  Peter F. MacNeilage,et al.  The Production of Speech , 2011, Springer New York.

[4]  A. Schafer Prosodic parsing: The role of prosody in sentence comprehension , 1997 .

[5]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Phonetic representations in a generative grammar , 1990 .

[6]  Narineh Hacopian,et al.  A three-way VOT contrast in final position: data from Armenian , 2003, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[7]  P. Onghena,et al.  Some issues in the statistical analysis of completely randomized and repeated measures designs for speech, language, and hearing research. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  M. Beckman,et al.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[10]  P. Keating,et al.  On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing , 1986, Journal of Linguistics.

[11]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[12]  Harry van der Hulst,et al.  Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent , 1988 .

[13]  C. Gussenhoven Explaining two correlations between vowel quality and tone: The duration connection , 2004 .

[14]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[15]  M. Tabain Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: acoustic results. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. Ernestus Voice Assimilation and Segment Reduction in Casual Dutch. A Corpus-based Study of the Phonology-phonetics Interface , 2000 .

[17]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  Crosslanguage Study of Voicing in Initial Stops , 1963 .

[18]  J. Perkell,et al.  Invariance and variability in speech processes , 1987 .

[19]  Sahyang Kim The role of prosodic cues in word segmentation of Korean , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[20]  A. Cohn Nasalisation in English: phonology or phonetics , 1993, Phonology.

[21]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages , 1999 .

[22]  J. Harrington,et al.  Techniques in Speech Acoustics , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[23]  P. Keating,et al.  A Prosodic View of Word Form Encoding for Speech Production , 2002 .

[24]  Roel Smits,et al.  Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: the role of prevoicing , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[25]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[26]  David J. Sheskin,et al.  Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures , 1997 .

[27]  G. M. Cambier-Langeveld The interaction between final lenghtening and accentual lenghtening: Dutch versus English , 1999 .

[28]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  A vowel height split explained: Compensatory Listening and Speaker Control , 2004 .

[29]  B. Lindblom Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[30]  Philip Winn Dictionary of Biological Psychology , 2003 .

[31]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[32]  Laurence White,et al.  Structural influences on accentual lengthening in English , 1999 .

[33]  J. Harrington,et al.  Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data , 1995 .

[34]  E. Selkirk On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[35]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Prosodically conditioned articulatory variations: A review , 1999 .

[36]  Janet Pierrehumbert,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Lenition of |h| and glottal stop , 1992 .

[37]  G. Booij The Phonology of Dutch , 1995 .

[38]  Alice Turk,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch vs. English , 1999 .

[39]  J. Ohala The Origin of Sound Patterns in Vocal Tract Constraints , 1983 .

[40]  Angelien Sanderman,et al.  On the perceptual strength of prosodic boundaries and its relation to suprasegmental cues , 1994 .

[41]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[42]  Cécile Fougeron,et al.  Articulatory properties of initial segments in several prosodic constituents in French , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[43]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Articulatory Vowel Lengthening and Coordination at Phrasal Junctures , 2000, Phonetica.

[44]  H. Huynh,et al.  Conditions under Which Mean Square Ratios in Repeated Measurements Designs Have Exact F-Distributions , 1970 .

[45]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[46]  Sahyang Kim The role of post-lexical tonal contou , 2003 .

[47]  S. Jun The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody , 2018 .

[48]  S. Jun,et al.  Prosodic Phrasing and Attachment Preferences , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[49]  Vincent J. van Heuven,et al.  The domain of final lengthening in production and perception in Dutch , 1997, EUROSPEECH.

[50]  P. Milenkovic,et al.  Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: preliminary data. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  Beckman,et al.  Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories , 1994 .

[52]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[53]  L. Lisker,et al.  Some Effects of Context On Voice Onset Time in English Stops , 1967, Language and speech.

[54]  K. D. Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[55]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  Lingvistkredsen Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague , 1945 .

[57]  P. Keating PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[58]  P. Keating,et al.  Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Acoustic and articulatory difference of speech segments at different prosodic positions , 2002 .

[60]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Linking linguistic contrasts to reality: The case of VOT. , 2000 .

[61]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[62]  G. Ayers,et al.  Guidelines for ToBI labelling , 1994 .

[63]  William L. Hays,et al.  Statistics, 5th ed. , 1994 .

[64]  P. Keating Physiological effects on stop consonant voicing , 1983 .

[65]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[66]  John Hart,et al.  A Perceptual Study of Intonation , 1990 .

[67]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[68]  J. Westbury Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  Taehong Cho,et al.  The Effects of Prosody on Articulation in English , 2002 .

[70]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Domain-initial strengthening in four languages , 2003 .

[71]  Alice Turk,et al.  The domain of accentual lengthening in American English , 1997 .

[72]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  D. Sheskin Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[74]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean , 2001, J. Phonetics.

[75]  A. Prince,et al.  On stress and linguistic rhythm , 1977 .

[76]  K. Stevens,et al.  A Note on Laryngeal Features , 2003 .

[77]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[78]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean , 1995 .

[79]  M. Beckman Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[80]  M. Beckman,et al.  The Interplay Between Prosodic Structure and Coarticulation , 1993, Language and speech.

[81]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Prosodically conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[82]  Taehong Cho Prosodic strengthening and featural enhancement: evidence from acoustic and articulatory realizations of /a,i/ in English. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[83]  Erwin Marsi Intonation in spoken language generation , 2001 .

[84]  Taehong Cho,et al.  The Use of Domain-initial Strengthening in Segmentation of Continuous English Speech , 2003 .

[85]  C. Gussenhoven Adequacy in Intonation Analysis: The Case of Dutch , 1988 .

[86]  M. Hasegawa-Johnson,et al.  The effect of accent on the acoustic cues to stop voicing in Radio News speech , 2003 .

[87]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch , 1995 .

[88]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[89]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  TOBI: a standard for labeling English prosody , 1992, ICSLP.

[90]  M. Tabain Effects of prosodic boundary on /aC/ sequences: articulatory results. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[91]  R. Krakow Physiological organization of syllables: a review , 1999 .

[92]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Manifestation of prosodic structure in articulatory variation: Evidence from lip kinematics in English , 2006 .

[93]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[94]  C. Laeufer,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV , 1995 .