Monte Carlo tree search -based non-coplanar trajectory design for station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT)

An important yet challenging problem in LINAC-based rotational arc radiation therapy is the design of beam trajectory, which requires simultaneous consideration of delivery efficiency and final dose distribution. In this work, we propose a novel trajectory selection strategy by developing a Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) algorithm during the beam trajectory selection process. To search through the vast number of possible trajectories, the MCTS algorithm was implemented. In this approach, a candidate trajectory is explored by starting from a leaf node and sequentially examining the next level of linked nodes with consideration of geometric and physical constraints. The maximum Upper Confidence Bounds for Trees, which is a function of average objective function value and the number of times the node under testing has been visited, was employed to intelligently select the trajectory. For each candidate trajectory, we run an inverse fluence map optimization with an infinity norm regularization. The ranking of the plan as measured by the corresponding objective function value was then fed back to update the statistics of the nodes on the trajectory. The method was evaluated with a chest wall and a brain case, and the results were compared with the coplanar and noncoplanar 4pi beam configurations. For both clinical cases, the MCTS method found effective and easy-to-deliver trajectories within an hour. As compared with the coplanar plans, it offers much better sparing of the OARs while maintaining the PTV coverage. The quality of the MCTS-generated plan is found to be comparable to the 4pi plans. Artificial intelligence based on MCTS is valuable to facilitate the design of beam trajectory and paves the way for future clinical use of non-coplanar treatment delivery.

[1]  Ke Sheng,et al.  4π non-coplanar liver SBRT: a novel delivery technique. , 2013, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[2]  A. Ahnesjö,et al.  A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation. , 1992, Medical physics.

[3]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  P. Evans,et al.  Non-coplanar trajectories to improve organ at risk sparing in volumetric modulated arc therapy for primary brain tumors. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  L. Xing,et al.  Incorporating prior knowledge into beam orientation optimization in IMRT. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Peter Ziegenhein,et al.  Comparison of beam angle selection strategies for intracranial IMRT. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  H. Jaap van den Herik,et al.  Parallel Monte-Carlo Tree Search , 2008, Computers and Games.

[8]  Christopher Barry Locke,et al.  Trajectory optimization in radiotherapy using sectioning (TORUS) , 2017, Medical physics.

[9]  Lei Xing,et al.  Inverse planning in the age of digital LINACs: station parameter optimized radiation therapy (SPORT) , 2014 .

[10]  Christopher Fougner,et al.  Parameter Selection and Preconditioning for a Graph Form Solver , 2015, 1503.08366.

[11]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The Solution for the Branching Factor of the Alpha-Beta Pruning Algorithm , 1981, ICALP.

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Dose optimization with first-order total-variation minimization for dense angularly sampled and sparse intensity modulated radiation therapy (DASSIM-RT). , 2012, Medical physics.

[13]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Choreographing couch and collimator in volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R Lee MacDonald,et al.  Dynamic trajectory-based couch motion for improvement of radiation therapy trajectories in cranial SRT. , 2014, Medical physics.

[15]  Simon M. Lucas,et al.  A Survey of Monte Carlo Tree Search Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[16]  D L McShan,et al.  Advanced interactive planning techniques for conformal therapy: high level beam descriptions and volumetric mapping techniques. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  An Optimization Framework for Conformal Radiation Treatment Planning , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[18]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Noncoplanar VMAT for nasopharyngeal tumors: Plan quality versus treatment time. , 2015, Medical physics.

[19]  Lei Xing,et al.  GPU computing in medical physics: a review. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search , 2016, Nature.

[21]  Lei Xing,et al.  Using total-variation regularization for intensity modulated radiation therapy inverse planning with field-specific numbers of segments , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Dimitre Hristov,et al.  Trajectory Modulated Arc Therapy: A Fully Dynamic Delivery With Synchronized Couch and Gantry Motion Significantly Improves Dosimetric Indices Correlated With Poor Cosmesis in Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  Thomas Bortfeld,et al.  A modular approach to intensity-modulated arc therapy optimization with noncoplanar trajectories , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Stewart J. Becker,et al.  Collision indicator charts for gantry‐couch position combinations for Varian linacs , 2011, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.