VIBRATION EXPOSURE OF INDIVIDUALS USING WHEELCHAIRS OVER CONCRETE PAVER SURFACES

SUMMARY According to the International Standards Organization 2631-1 standard on human vibration, individuals in a seated position are at risk of injury due to whole-body vibrations when exposed for long periods of time. Wheelchair users fit this description perfectly, however little research has been conducted to evaluate the amount of vibration transmitted to a wheelchair user. The vibration exposure was produced by traversing nine pavement surfaces with 10 individuals without disabilities in a manual and powered wheelchair. The surfaces included poured, jointed concrete and concrete and clay pavers with chamfers from 0 to 8 mm wide and two herringbone laying patterns for selected surfaces. Power wheelchair results: The standard poured concrete surface was used as a norm and compared to the other surfaces. Two surfaces resulted in higher vibration exposure than the standard; an 8mm wide chamfer concrete paver in a 90 degree herringbone pattern and a 6mm wide chamfer pavers 90 degree herringbone pattern. Manual wheelchair results: Three surfaces resulted in higher vibration exposure than the standard surface; the 8mm wide chamfer surface in a 90 degree herringbone pattern, and the two 6mm wide chamfer surfaces placed in 90 and 45 degree patterns. Recommendations: Smaller chamfer widths on pavers exposes individuals using wheelchairs to less vibration. Also, pavers installed in a 90 degree herringbone pattern produced lower vibration exposures. It is recommended that only pavers of 6 mm wide chamfers or less be used with a 90 degree herringbone pattern.

[1]  M J Griffin,et al.  Difference thresholds for automobile seat vibration. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  Shirley G Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluation Of Selected Sidewalk Pavement Surfaces For Vibration Experienced By Users Of Manual AndPowered Wheelchairs , 2004, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[3]  M. Boninger,et al.  Analysis of vibrations induced during wheelchair propulsion. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  R A Cooper,et al.  Road loads acting on manual wheelchairs. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  D G Wilder,et al.  Are Occupational Drivers at an Increased Risk for Developing Musculoskeletal Disorders? , 1996, Spine.

[6]  R.A. Cooper,et al.  SMART/sup Wheels/: development and testing of a system for measuring manual wheelchair propulsion dynamics , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Mutasim A. Salman,et al.  On the design of active suspension incorporating human sensitivity to vibration , 1989 .

[8]  Michael J. Griffin,et al.  Handbook of Human Vibration , 1990 .

[9]  R. Cooper,et al.  ANALYSIS OF VIBRATION AND COMPARISON OF FOUR WHEELCHAIR CUSHIONS DURING MANUAL WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION , 2003 .

[10]  G. R. Allen,et al.  Ride quality and international standard ISO 2631 (Guide for the evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration) , 1975 .

[11]  T E Fairley,et al.  Predicting the discomfort caused by tractor vibration. , 1995, Ergonomics.