Analysis of results related to good and bad outcomes of Intacs implantation for keratoconus correction

PURPOSE: To evaluate factors influencing good and poor outcomes after intracorneal ring segment implantation to correct keratoconus. SETTING: Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante (Vissum Corporation), University of Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of the visual outcome, 25 eyes of 21 patients were implanted after intracorneal ring segments (Intacs, Addition Technology) as a method to correct keratoconus. Outcomes were evaluated 6 months after implantation based on the visual results. Group A comprised 20 eyes that gained 3 lines or more of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) to correct keratoconus, and Group B comprised 5 eyes that lost 1 line of BSCVA. RESULTS: In Group A, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.43 (20/50) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.82 (20/20) (P≤.0001). In Group B, the preoperative mean BSCVA was 0.36 (20/63) and the postoperative mean BSCVA, 0.24 (20/80) (P≤.02). The preoperative mean sphere power was 3.90 diopters (D) greater in Group B than in Group A (P≤.007); the mean spherical equivalent was 4.36 D greater (P≤.007), and the mean K‐reading was 6.91 D greater (P≤.001). The postoperative reduction in spherical dioptric power was 2.11 D (P≤.027) and the mean spherical equivalent, 2.81 D (P≤.003), significant only in Group A. The reduction in mean central K‐readings was 4.30 D (P≤.0001) in Group A and 6.19 D (P≤.014) in Group B. The correlation of the preoperative mean K value to the postoperative BSCVA was significant at the .01 level by the Pearson test (−0.67). In Group A, all eyes (100%) had a mean K‐reading ≤53 D. In Group B, 4 eyes (80%) had a mean K‐reading ≥55 D. CONCLUSION: Intacs provided better results in visual acuity and corneal topography quality and significantly reduced the spherical equivalent in eyes with keratoconus with relatively low mean K values (≤53 D) and a relatively low spherical equivalent. In advanced keratoconus (mean K‐reading ≥55 D), poor results can be anticipated.

[1]  Z. Tunc,et al.  Anneaux intracornéens (INTACS) pour le traitement de l'astigmatisme asymétrique du kératocône , 2008 .

[2]  L. Buratto,et al.  Excimer laser lamellar keratoplasty of augmented thickness for keratoconus. , 1998, Journal of refractive surgery.

[3]  J Colin,et al.  Correcting keratoconus with intracorneal rings. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  Z. Tunç,et al.  [Corneal ring segments (INTACS) for the treatment of asymmetrical astigmatism of the keratoconus. Follow-up after 2 years]. , 2003, Journal francais d'ophtalmologie.

[5]  N. Maeda,et al.  Changes in anterior and posterior corneal curvatures in keratoconus. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[6]  J. Alió,et al.  Intracorneal asymmetrical rings for keratoconus: where should the thicker segment be implanted? , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[7]  S. Shah,et al.  PRK in patients with a keratoconic topography picture. The concept of a physiological 'displaced apex syndrome'. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Alió,et al.  Changes in keratoconic corneas after intracorneal ring segment explantation and reimplantation. , 2004, Ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Ruckhofer,et al.  Clinical characteristics of lamellar channel deposits after implantation of Intacs , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  M. Blumenthal,et al.  Three year results of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy for mild and atypical keratoconus , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[11]  D. Evensen,et al.  Effects of intrastromal corneal ring size and thickness on corneal flattening in human eyes. , 1991, Refractive & corneal surgery.

[12]  J. Krachmer,et al.  Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. , 1984, Survey of ophthalmology.

[13]  J. Alió,et al.  One or 2 Intacs segments for the correction of keratoconus , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.