Do Observers Perceive Depth in Reaching Task Within Virtual Environments

The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether observers are able to perceive depth of virtual objects within virtual environments during reaching tasks. In other words, we tackled the question of observer immersion in a displayed virtual environment. For this purpose, eight observers were asked to reach for a virtual objects displayed within their peripersonal space in two conditions: condition one provided a small virtual sphere that was displayed beyond the subjects index finger as an extension of their hand and condition two provided no visual feedback. In addition, audio feedback was provided when the contact with the virtual object was made in both conditions. Although observers slightly overestimated depth within the peripersonal space, they accurately aimed for the virtual objects based on the kinematics analysis. Furthermore, no significant difference was found concerning the movement between conditions for all observers. Observers accurately targeted the virtual point correctly with regard to time and space. This suggests the virtual environment sufficiently simulated the information normally present in the central nervous system.Copyright © 2011 by ASME

[1]  G P Bingham,et al.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited , 2006, VR.

[3]  Andrea H. Mason,et al.  Reaching movements to augmented and graphic objects in virtual environments , 2001, CHI.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  M. A. Goodale,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  G P Bingham,et al.  Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  T. Pozzo,et al.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Ordinal depth information from accommodation? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  Russell L. Storms.  Auditory-visual cross-modal perception phenomena , 1998 .

[10]  Marta Olivetti Belardinelli,et al.  Comparing distance perception in different virtual environments , 2009, Cognitive Processing.

[11]  Paul Sharkey,et al.  Estimation of Distances in Virtual Environments Using Size Constancy , 2009, Int. J. Virtual Real..

[12]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter when Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments? , 2004, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Will Spijkers,et al.  Depth Perception in Virtual Reality: Distance Estimations in Peri- and Extrapersonal Space , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Jannick P. Rolland,et al.  Towards Quantifying Depth and Size Perception in Virtual Environments , 1993, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[15]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Calibration of Distance and Size Does Not Calibrate Shape Information: Comparison of Dynamic Monocular and Static and Dynamic Binocular Vision , 2005 .

[16]  Mark F. Bradshaw,et al.  Reaching for virtual objects: binocular disparity and the control of prehension , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.