Social media networking satisfaction in the US and Vietnam: Content versus connection

Abstract Facebook is one of the most notable and popular social media networks in the world. It appeals to people of differing cultures, mindsets, and demographics. This study explores cross-cultural differences regarding the relative emphasis of social connection versus informational content to examine ingredients for satisfaction in a social media network in Vietnam (n = 190) versus the US (n = 280). Uses and gratifications theory and self-determination theory argue that belonging, affinity, interactivity, emotional connection, system quality, and information quality are equally important to satisfaction for both cultures. However, the social capital theory, social network density, and cultural tightness-looseness combine to propose differences between the two cultures. Therefore, this study uses fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to find that both cultures value belonging, affinity, and interactivity. In terms of differences, Vietnamese derive higher satisfaction from system quality and emotional connection, and Americans indicate higher satisfaction from information quality.

[1]  Lin Qiu,et al.  Cultural Differences and Switching of In-Group Sharing Behavior Between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) Social Networking Site , 2013 .

[2]  Anita Whiting,et al.  Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach , 2013 .

[3]  KimJihoon,et al.  Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital , 2017 .

[4]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Determinants of continued use of social media: the perspectives of uses and gratifications theory and perceived interactivity , 2015, Inf. Res..

[5]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging , 2010 .

[6]  Jin-Liang Wang,et al.  Cultural differences in social networking site use: A comparative study of China and the United States , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Jana L. Raver,et al.  On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Adrian C. North,et al.  The uses and gratifications of using Facebook music listening applications , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  A. Woodside.  Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[10]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social networks and life satisfaction: The interplay of network density and regulatory focus , 2015, Motivation and Emotion.

[11]  Christian Fernando Libaque Saenz,et al.  Use and gratifications of mobile SNSs: Facebook and KakaoTalk in Korea , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[12]  Michele J. Gelfand,et al.  Tightness–looseness: A new framework to understand consumer behavior , 2017 .

[13]  Chin-Siang Ang,et al.  Understanding computer-mediated communication attributes and life satisfaction from the perspectives of uses and gratifications and self-determination , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  J. Blumler.  The Role of Theory in Uses and Gratifications Studies , 1979 .

[15]  Xinlei Chen,et al.  The Impact of Sampling and Network Topology on the Estimation of Social Intercorrelations , 2013 .

[16]  Mark Graham,et al.  Uneven Geographies of User-Generated Information: Patterns of Increasing Informational Poverty , 2014 .

[17]  P. Ellis,et al.  Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization , 2011 .

[18]  J. Alba,et al.  Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption , 2013 .

[19]  É. Robinot,et al.  Do hotels' “green” attributes contribute to customer satisfaction? , 2010 .

[20]  Namkee Park,et al.  Individuals' personal network characteristics and patterns of Facebook use: A social network approach , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Applying complexity theory to deepen service dominant logic: Configural analysis of customer experience-and-outcome assessments of professional services for personal transformations , 2014 .

[22]  Anjala S. Krishen,et al.  The generation of virtual needs: Recipes for satisfaction in social media networking , 2016 .

[23]  Jau-Shyong Wang,et al.  Drivers of customer intention to use online banking: An empirical study in Vietnam , 2009 .

[24]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Assessing structural correlates to social capital in Facebook ego networks , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[25]  Anjala S. Krishen,et al.  Is having accurate knowledge necessary for implementing safe practices?: A consumer folk theories-of-mind perspective on the impact of price , 2016 .

[26]  Anjala S. Krishen,et al.  From Liking to Loyalty: The Impact of Network Affinity in the Social Media Digital Space , 2015, DATB.

[27]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Measurement Versus Calibration: A Set‐Theoretic Approach , 2008 .

[28]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[29]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Illustrating the Power of fsQCA in Explaining Paradoxical Consumer Environmental Orientations , 2017 .

[30]  Chris Fullwood,et al.  Individual Differences as Predictors of Social Networking , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[31]  D. Chavis,et al.  Sense of community: A definition and theory , 1986 .

[32]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Social media usage and firm performance: the mediating role of social capital , 2017, Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[33]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Determinants of successful virtual communities: Contributions from system characteristics and social factors , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[34]  Lin Qiu,et al.  Emotional disclosure on social networking sites: The role of network structure and psychological needs , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Anjala S. Krishen,et al.  Social networking from a social capital perspective: a cross-cultural analysis , 2019, European Journal of Marketing.

[36]  Carol M. Megehee,et al.  Culture, religiosity, and economic configural models explaining tipping-behavior prevalence across nations , 2017 .

[37]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers , 2002, CACM.

[38]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[39]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  The interplay of intrinsic need satisfaction and Facebook specific motives in explaining addictive behavior on Facebook , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Bulletin Personality and Social Psychology the Challenge of Staying Happier : Testing the Hedonic Adaptation Prevention Model on Behalf Of: Society for Personality and Social Psychology , 2012 .

[41]  Anjala S. Krishen,et al.  The pursuit of virtual happiness: Exploring the social media experience across generations , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[42]  Peer C. Fiss.  A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[43]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  Limits of internationalization theories in an unlimited world , 2002 .

[44]  C. Finkenauer,et al.  Do individualism and collectivism on three levels (country, individual, and situation) influence theory-of-mind efficiency? A cross-country study , 2017, PloS one.

[45]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[46]  Yoojung Kim,et al.  Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Archana Krishnan,et al.  The Influence of Computer-Mediated Communication Apprehension on Motives for Facebook Use , 2012 .

[48]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Capital: Theory and Research , 2017 .

[49]  Nina Reynolds,et al.  Measuring cross‐cultural service quality: a framework for assessment , 2002 .

[50]  Angela Ka-yee Leung,et al.  Putting Their Best Foot Forward: Emotional Disclosure on Facebook , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[51]  Irem Uz,et al.  The Index of Cultural Tightness and Looseness Among 68 Countries , 2015 .

[52]  Victor Joo Chuan Tong,et al.  Effects of Cultural Tightness–Looseness and Social Network Density on Expression of Positive and Negative Emotions: A Large-Scale Study of Impression Management by Facebook Users , 2018, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[53]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[54]  Elizabeth W. Dunn,et al.  Give It Up , 2013 .

[55]  Patrick Emmenegger,et al.  QCA, the Truth Table Analysis and Large-N Survey Data : The Benefits of Calibration and the Importance of Robustness Tests , 2014 .

[56]  Jihoon Kim,et al.  Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  I. Jeffries.  Contemporary Vietnam: A Guide to Economic and Political Developments , 2011 .

[58]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Understanding affective commitment in social virtual worlds: The role of cultural tightness , 2018, Inf. Manag..