Cellular facility layout problem: a case of tower manufacturing industry

Purpose In today’s competitive market, product demand and its mix frequently vary due to various uncertainties, which thus imparts the overall manufacturing cost. Furthermore, uncertainties also impart the layout design in manufacturing industries in the long run. Therefore, the layout design needs to capture the possibility of uncertainties, and these uncertainties must be captured while designing the layout of a facility. Hence, an efficient facility layout design minimizes the manufacturing cost and lead time. The purpose of this paper is to propose a cellular layout design for a tower manufacturing industry. Design/methodology/approach The paper develops an embedded simulated annealing-based meta-heuristic to solve proposed cellular layout under different scenarios considering single and multi-time periods for tower manufacturing industry. A comparative study is also performed to analyze comparison among static cellular layout, a dynamic cellular layout or a robust stochastic cellular layout for the tower manufacturing industry. Findings The current layout of the industry is a process layout. Here, the layout for a tower manufacturing industry is proposed under SCFLP, DCFLP and RSCFLP. The proposed models and solution methodology is tested using six scenarios with different combination of time periods. Lastly, OFV value obtained for all the scenarios is compared, and it is found that RSCFLP outruns other SCFLP and DCFLP for a tower manufacturing industry. Based on the above study, it is also concluded that RSCFLP is an efficient and effective layout in tower manufacturing industry. Originality/value The paper proposes a cellular layout design for a tower manufacturing industry. The cellular layout design is found to be preferred over the traditional layout as it reduces material handling cost, manufacturing lead time and hazards. Moreover, it enhances productivity and quality.

[1]  R. Agarwal,et al.  The Flexibility Paradox: Achieving Ambidexterity in High-Variety, Low-Volume Manufacturing , 2018, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management.

[2]  Kyrre Glette,et al.  Pareto Optimal Based Evolutionary Approach for Solving Multi-Objective Facility Layout Problem , 2009, ICONIP.

[3]  Yeong-Dae Kim,et al.  A systematic procedure for setting parameters in simulated annealing algorithms , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  Kourosh Eshghi,et al.  A new model for robust facility layout problem , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[5]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Designing robust stochastic bi-objective cellular layout in manufacturing systems , 2017 .

[6]  Ghorbanali Moslemipour,et al.  A review of intelligent approaches for designing dynamic and robust layouts in flexible manufacturing systems , 2012 .

[7]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  CHAOTIC SIMULATED ANNEALING FOR SOLVING STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC FACILITY LAYOUT PROBLEM , 2014 .

[8]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[9]  Lai Soon Lee,et al.  Heuristics and Metaheuristics Approaches for Facility Layout Problems: A Survey , 2016 .

[10]  Jan Karel Lenstra,et al.  Job Shop Scheduling by Simulated Annealing , 1992, Oper. Res..

[11]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  Simulated Annealing: Theory and Applications , 1987, Mathematics and Its Applications.

[12]  S H Ariafar,et al.  A stochastic facility layout model in cellular manufacturing systems , 2011 .

[13]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Analysis of simulated annealing cooling schemas for design of optimal flexible layout under uncertain dynamic product demand , 2019 .

[14]  Urban Wemmerlöv,et al.  CELLULAR MANUFACTURING AT 46 USER PLANTS : IMPLEMENTATION EXPERIENCES AND PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS , 1997 .

[15]  Yong Yin,et al.  A heuristic algorithm for cell formation problems with consideration of multiple production factors , 2010 .

[16]  Lixin Tang,et al.  A hybrid approach of ordinal optimization and iterated local search for manufacturing cell formation , 2009 .

[17]  Alistair I. Mees,et al.  Convergence of an annealing algorithm , 1986, Math. Program..

[18]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  A similarity score-based two-phase heuristic approach to solve the dynamic cellular facility layout for manufacturing systems , 2017 .

[19]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  An improved heuristic approach for multi-objective facility layout problem , 2010 .

[20]  David Connolly An improved annealing scheme for the QAP , 1990 .

[21]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Simulated Annealing-Based Embedded Meta-Heuristic Approach to Solve Bi-objective Robust Stochastic Sustainable Cellular Layout , 2018 .

[22]  Meir J. Rosenblatt,et al.  The dynamics of plant layout , 1986 .