Change in intracellular pH of Escherichia coli mediates the chemotactic response to certain attractants and repellents

Changes in the membrane potential, pH gradient, proton motive force, and intracellular pH of Escherichia coli were followed during the chemotactic responses to a variety of potentially membrane-active compounds. Lipophilic weak acids, decreases in extracellular pH, and nigericin each caused a repellent response. Lipophilic weak bases, increases in extracellular pH, and valinomycin in the presence of K+ each caused an attractant response. Changes in membrane potential, pH gradient, and proton motive force did not correlate with the behavioral responses to these treatments, but changes in intracellular pH did correlate. Furthermore, the strength of the response to a weak acid was correlated with the magnitude of the change of the intracellular pH, and many compounds which could alter the intracellular pH were found to be chemotactically active. Apparently these attractants and repellents are not detected by specific chemoreceptors but rather are detected via the ability of cells to sense and respond to changes in intracellular pH. The pathway of sensory transduction which proceeds through methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I was found to be involved in the response to a change in intracellular pH.

[1]  D. Koshland,et al.  Sensory electrophysiology of bacteria: relationship of the membrane potential to motility and chemotaxis in Bacillus subtilis. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  J. Adler,et al.  Role of methionine in bacterial chemotaxis: requirement for tumbling and involvement in information processing. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  A. Crofts,et al.  Ion transport induced by light and antibiotics IN CHROMATOPHORES FROM Rhodospirillum rubrum. , 1968, European journal of biochemistry.

[4]  J. Adler,et al.  Chemomechanical coupling without ATP: the source of energy for motility and chemotaxis in bacteria. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis toward specific chemicals. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Complementation analysis and deletion mapping of Escherichia coli mutants defective in chemotaxis , 1978, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  R. Macnab,et al.  Inversion of a behavioral response in bacterial chemotaxis: explanation at the molecular level. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D E Koshland,et al.  Common Mechanism for Repellents and Attractants in Bacterial Chemotaxis , 1973, Science.

[9]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Studies of the beta-galactoside transporter in inverted membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli. I. Symmetrical facilitated diffusion and proton gradient-coupled transport. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  S. Schultz,et al.  Cation Transport in Escherichia coli , 1965, The Journal of general physiology.

[11]  J. Pober,et al.  Light-regulated enzymes of vertebrate retinal rods. , 1979, Advances in cyclic nucleotide research.

[12]  R. Macnab,et al.  The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  F. Harold Antimicrobial Agents and Membrane Function , 1969 .

[14]  S. Luria,et al.  Reduction of membrane potential, an immediate effect of colicin K. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Winkler,et al.  Mechanism of action of NH4Cl and other weak bases in the activation of sea urchin eggs , 1978, Nature.

[16]  H. Kondoh Tumbling chemotaxis mutants of Escherichia coli: possible gene-dependent effect of methionine starvation , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  D. O. Rudin,et al.  Development of K+-Na+ discrimination in experimental bimolecular lipid membranes by macrocyclic antibiotics. , 1967, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[18]  D. Koshland,et al.  Protonmotive force and bacterial sensing , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  R. Macnab Bacterial motility and chemotaxis: the molecular biology of a behavioral system. , 1978, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[20]  J. Konisky,et al.  Mode of action of colicin Ia: effect of colicin on the Escherichia coli proton electrochemical gradient. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Simon,et al.  Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli: methylation of che gene products. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Adler,et al.  Identification of a methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein for the ribose and galactose chemoreceptors of Escherichia coli. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  F. Harold Membranes and Energy Transduction in Bacteria1 1Abbreviations: Δψ, membrane potential; ΔpH, pH gradient; Δp, proton-motive force. These are related by: Δp = Δψ - (23RT/F) ΔpH ≅ Δψ - 60 ΔpH. ANS, l-anilino-8-naphthalene sulfonate; DCCD, N, N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide; CCCP, carbonylcyanide-m-chloroph , 1977 .

[24]  H. Kaback,et al.  The electrochemical gradient of protons and its relationship to active transport in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. Adler,et al.  Attraction by repellents: an error in sensory information processing by bacterial mutants. , 1978, Science.

[26]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  cheA, cheB, and cheC genes of Escherichia coli and their role in chemotaxis , 1976, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  D E Koshland,et al.  Membrane receptors for aspartate and serine in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1979, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  J. Adler,et al.  Attractants and repellents control demethylation of methylated chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  J. Adler,et al.  Change in membrane potential during bacterial chemotaxis. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  J. Adler,et al.  Change in direction of flagellar rotation is the basis of the chemotactic response in Escherichia coli , 1974, Nature.

[31]  J. H. Johnson,et al.  Antibiotic-mediated transport of alkali ions across lipid barriers. , 1967, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Adler,et al.  Sensory transduction in Escherichia coli: two complementary pathways of information processing that involve methylated proteins. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  E. Padan,et al.  The proton electrochemical gradient in Escherichia coli cells. , 1976, European journal of biochemistry.

[34]  H. Kaback,et al.  The electrochemical proton gradient in Escherichia coli membrane vesicles. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[35]  J. Adler,et al.  Genetic and biochemical properties of Escherichia coli mutants with defects in serine chemotaxis , 1980, Journal of bacteriology.

[36]  A. Warner,et al.  Carbon dioxide reversibly abolishes ionic communication between cells of early amphibian embryo , 1977, Nature.

[37]  F. Harold,et al.  PROBING MEMBRANE TRANSPORT MECHANISMS WITH IONOPHORES * , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.