Nitrogen loss rates in streams: Scale‐dependence and up‐scaling methodology

[1] We show that the large spatial aggregation of model parameters in common catchment scale nitrogen budget modeling leads to artifacts that may, for instance, be a factor in explaining reported decreases of calibrated in-stream nitrogen loss rates, λs*, with increasing stream size. In general, the common assumption of a single representative solute travel time for an entire stream reach may lead to considerable underestimation of the actual underlying local biogeochemical loss rate λs by λs*, which increases with actual λs value and/or increasing mean solute travel time and travel time variability in the stream. We propose an up-scaling methodology to overcome such model artifacts, in form of closed-form expressions of catchment-scale, in-stream nitrogen delivery factors for diffuse and point sources, as functions of local-scale nitrogen loss rates, λs.

[1]  S. Nixon Coastal marine eutrophication: A definition, social causes, and future concerns , 1995 .

[2]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring data , 1997 .

[3]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Field scale mass arrival of sorptive solute into the groundwater , 1991 .

[4]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Resolving the scale-dependence of mineral weathering rates. , 2000 .

[5]  V. Smith,et al.  Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient inputs on freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. , 1999, Environmental pollution.

[6]  C. Welty,et al.  A Critical Review of Data on Field-Scale Dispersion in Aquifers , 1992 .

[7]  Gregory E. Schwarz,et al.  Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico , 2000, Nature.

[8]  G. Destouni,et al.  Solute Transport Through an Integrated Heterogeneous Soil‐Groundwater System , 1995 .

[9]  Maja Brandt,et al.  Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden , 1998 .

[10]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Solute transport through the integrated groundwater‐stream system of a catchment , 2004 .

[11]  Elizabeth W. Boyer,et al.  Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. , 2002 .

[12]  Roy Haggerty,et al.  Power‐law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd‐order mountain stream , 2002 .

[13]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Temporal moment analysis of tracer discharge in streams: Combined effect of physicochemical mass transfer and morphology , 2000 .

[14]  V. Cvetkovic,et al.  Mass arrival of sorptive solute in heterogeneous porous media. , 1990 .

[15]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments , 2000, Nature.

[16]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  The geomorphologic structure of hydrologic response , 1979 .

[17]  Alexander H. Elliott,et al.  Estimating the sources and transport of nutrients in the Waikato River Basin, New Zealand , 2002 .

[18]  S. Hamilton,et al.  Control of Nitrogen Export from Watersheds by Headwater Streams , 2001, Science.

[19]  Maja Brandt,et al.  Watershed modelling of nonpoint nitrogen losses from arable land to the Swedish coast in 1985 and 1994 , 2000 .

[20]  Vladimir Cvetkovic,et al.  Transport of reactive tracers in rock fractures , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.