Antibiogramj: A tool for analysing images from disk diffusion tests

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Disk diffusion testing, known as antibiogram, is widely applied in microbiology to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms. The measurement of the diameter of the zone of growth inhibition of microorganisms around the antimicrobial disks in the antibiogram is frequently performed manually by specialists using a ruler. This is a time-consuming and error-prone task that might be simplified using automated or semi-automated inhibition zone readers. However, most readers are usually expensive instruments with embedded software that require significant changes in laboratory design and workflow. METHODS Based on the workflow employed by specialists to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms, we have designed a software tool that, from images of disk diffusion tests, semi-automatises the process. Standard computer vision techniques are employed to achieve such an automatisation. RESULTS We present AntibiogramJ, a user-friendly and open-source software tool to semi-automatically determine, measure and categorise inhibition zones of images from disk diffusion tests. AntibiogramJ is implemented in Java and deals with images captured with any device that incorporates a camera, including digital cameras and mobile phones. The fully automatic procedure of AntibiogramJ for measuring inhibition zones achieves an overall agreement of 87% with an expert microbiologist; moreover, AntibiogramJ includes features to easily detect when the automatic reading is not correct and fix it manually to obtain the correct result. CONCLUSIONS AntibiogramJ is a user-friendly, platform-independent, open-source, and free tool that, up to the best of our knowledge, is the most complete software tool for antibiogram analysis without requiring any investment in new equipment or changes in the laboratory.

[1]  G Hejblum,et al.  Automated interpretation of disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility tests with the radial profile analysis algorithm , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[2]  Michael Hombach,et al.  Standardisation of disk diffusion results for antibiotic susceptibility testing using the sirscan automated zone reader , 2013, BMC Microbiology.

[3]  A. Bauer,et al.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. , 1966, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  Gary R. Bradski,et al.  ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[5]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[6]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  A review of the current state of digital plate reading of cultures in clinical microbiology , 2015, Journal of pathology informatics.

[7]  Georg Peters,et al.  Evaluation of an Automated System for Reading and Interpreting Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Fastidious Bacteria , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  D F Brown,et al.  Instrumentation in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[9]  G. Greub,et al.  Laboratory automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? , 2016, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[10]  J. Kittler,et al.  Comparative study of Hough Transform methods for circle finding , 1990, Image Vis. Comput..

[11]  Kevin Williams,et al.  Professional XML , 2001 .

[12]  D. Livermore,et al.  Interpretative reading: recognizing the unusual and inferring resistance mechanisms from resistance phenotypes. , 2001, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[13]  H. Verbrugh,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy of disk diffusion zone diameters obtained by manual zone measurements to that by automated zone measurements to determine antimicrobial susceptibility. , 2008, Journal of Microbiological Methods.

[14]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Current concepts in laboratory testing to guide antimicrobial therapy. , 2012, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[15]  Marcelino M. de Andrade,et al.  Development of an automatic identification algorithm for antibiogram analysis , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  A. Mochon,et al.  Telemicrobiology: Focusing on Quality in an Era of Laboratory Consolidation , 2016 .

[17]  M Kolbert,et al.  Evaluation of the OSIRIS video reader as an automated measurement system for the agar disk diffusion technique. , 2004, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[18]  Judith Berman,et al.  diskImageR: quantification of resistance and tolerance to antimicrobial drugs using disk diffusion assays. , 2016, Microbiology.

[19]  Rafael Cantón Moreno,et al.  Lectura interpretada del antibiograma: ¿ejercicio intelectual o necesidad clínica? , 2002 .

[20]  M. Ferraro,et al.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[21]  H K Geiss,et al.  Evaluation of the BIOMIC video reader system for routine use in the clinical microbiology laboratory. , 2000, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[22]  G Kahlmeter,et al.  Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. , 2014, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[23]  E K Korgenski,et al.  Evaluation of the BIOMIC Video Reader System for Determining Interpretive Categories of Isolates on the Basis of Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Results , 1998, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.