Collaborative and Quantitative Prediction for Reinforcement and Penetration Depth of Weld Bead Based on Molten Pool Image and Deep Residual Network

Weld quality is generally determined by reinforcement and penetration depth of weld bead in arc welding. Penetration depth reflects weld strength and reinforcement reflects weld shape. What’s more, there is a strong coupling between them, therefore it is necessary to monitor them collaboratively and quantitatively. In this paper, vision sensor system is utilized to collect non-interfering molten pool images during CMT (Cold Metal Transfer) welding process. Meanwhile, according to the locating system and the metallographic diagram, the position of molten pool image on weld bead is measured, as well as the corresponding reinforcement and penetration. A reinforcement-penetration collaborative prediction network model based on deep residual is designed to quantitatively predict reinforcement and penetration depth. Combining the physical_mechanisms of forming process, we optimize the network structure that the backbone network is Resnet34, the input is frequency domain image of the middle and rear areas of molten pool, and the output is dual and synergetic. The correlation characteristics that affect reinforcement and penetration depth in molten pool images are fully studied. The reinforcement prediction error is less than 0.13 mm and penetration depth is less than 0.09 mm for various welding parameters and workpiece shapes.

[1]  Chen Shanben,et al.  The modeling of welding pool surface reflectance of aluminum alloy pulse GTAW , 2005 .

[2]  M. Hashmi,et al.  Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld-bead profile , 2005 .

[3]  José A. R. Vargas,et al.  Sensor Fusion to Estimate the Depth and Width of the Weld Bead in Real Time in GMAW Processes , 2018, Sensors.

[4]  Zemin Wang,et al.  Role of molten pool mode on formability, microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy , 2016 .

[5]  Ke Ma,et al.  Influence of a Ni-foil interlayer on Fe/Al dissimilar joint by laser penetration welding , 2012 .

[6]  Leilei Wang,et al.  Perspective on Double Pulsed Gas Metal Arc Welding , 2017 .

[7]  V. Kalaichelvi,et al.  Prediction Analysis of Weld-Bead and Heat Affected Zone in TIG welding using Artificial Neural Networks , 2018 .

[8]  Shanben Chen,et al.  Surface height and geometry parameters for describing shape of weld pool during pulsed GTAW , 1999, Optics East.

[9]  Joshua M. Pearce,et al.  In situ formation of substrate release mechanisms for gas metal arc weld metal 3-D printing , 2015 .

[10]  Jussi Kinnunen Controlling full penetration in MAG welding by the application of infrared thermography and neural network , 2016 .

[11]  N. Arzola,et al.  The Effect of Weld Reinforcement and Post-Welding Cooling Cycles on Fatigue Strength of Butt-Welded Joints under Cyclic Tensile Loading , 2018, Materials.

[12]  Shanben Chen,et al.  Prediction of weld bead geometry of MAG welding based on XGBoost algorithm , 2018, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[13]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[14]  Tomonori Yamada,et al.  In-situ X-ray observation of molten pool depth during laser micro welding , 2012 .

[15]  Subhasis Maji,et al.  Prediction and optimization of weld bead geometry in gas metal arc welding process using RSM and fmincon , 2013 .

[16]  Jing Han,et al.  Online weld pool contour extraction and seam width prediction based on mixing spectral vision , 2018, Optical Review.

[17]  J. Prakash,et al.  EFFECT OF WELDING PARAMETERS ON THE WELDABILITY OF MATERIAL , 2010 .

[18]  Guoqing Wang,et al.  Effects of weld reinforcement on tensile behavior and mechanical properties of 2219-T87 aluminum alloy TIG welded joints , 2017 .

[19]  Zhang Shenghai,et al.  The technology and welding joint properties of hybrid laser-tig welding on thick plate , 2013 .