Where's the Party?

Political parties are prominent in legislative politics and legislative research. Using data from the 99th Congress, this article assesses the degree to which significant party behaviour – defined and operationalized as behaviour that is independent of preferences – occurs in two key stages of legislative organization: the formation of standing committees and the appointment of conferees. Four hypotheses are developed and tested. When controlling for preferences and other hypothesized effects, positive and significant party effects are rare. A discussion addresses some criticisms of this unorthodox approach and attempts to reconcile some differences between these and previous findings.

[1]  D. Price.  Who makes the laws? : creativity and power in Senate committees , 1974 .

[2]  R. Plotnick,et al.  Party, Political Liberalism, and Redistribution , 1990 .

[3]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  The Committee Assignment Process and the Conditional Nature of Committee Bias , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[4]  Strategic Implications of Conferee Selection in the House of Representatives , 1989 .

[5]  J. E. Schwarz.  Exploring a New Role in Policy Making: The British House of Commons in the 1970s , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Ada Chenoweth McCown.  The Congressional Conference Committee , 1927 .

[7]  G. Steiner.  The Congressional conference committee , 1951 .

[8]  Willmoore Kendall,et al.  The American Party Systems , 1954, American Political Science Review.

[9]  B. Sinclair.  From Party Voting To Regional Fragmentation , 1978 .

[10]  Samuel J. Eldersveld,et al.  Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System , 1951 .

[11]  Daniel M. Ogden join,et al.  The giant jigsaw puzzle , 1978 .

[12]  Richard F. Fenno.  The Power Of The Purse , 1966 .

[13]  Gregory A. Caldeira,et al.  Party Voting in the United States Congress , 1988, British Journal of Political Science.

[14]  L. Epstein,et al.  What Happened to the British Party Model? , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Keith. Krehbiel.  Deference, Extremism, and Interest Group Ratings , 1994 .

[16]  B. Sinclair.  Majority Party Leadership Strategies for Coping with the New U. S. House , 1981 .

[17]  R. Ross,et al.  The third House : conference committees in the United States Congress , 1973 .

[18]  Richard F. Fenno.  Congressmen in committees , 1973 .

[19]  Charles O. Jones.  Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives , 1968, The Journal of Politics.

[20]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers? , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[21]  Steven S. Smith,et al.  Committees in Congress , 1984 .

[22]  J. Manley.  The politics of finance : the House Committee on Ways and Means , 1970 .

[23]  S. Patterson.  LEGISLATIVE LEADERSHIP AND POLITICAL IDEOLOGY , 1963 .

[24]  David W. Rohde.  Parties and leaders in the postreform house , 1991 .

[25]  M. Collie.  Electoral Patterns and Voting Alignments in the U. S. House, 1886-1986 , 1989 .

[26]  B. Cain.  The personal vote , 1987 .

[27]  S. Patterson.  Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[28]  W. Crain,et al.  Legislative committees as loyalty-generating institutions , 1994 .

[29]  Richard F. Fenno,et al.  The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress , 1966 .

[30]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House , 1993 .

[31]  B. Rundquist,et al.  A Revised Theory of Winning in House-Senate Conferences , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[32]  E. Uslaner.  The Transformation of the U.S. Senate@@@Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[33]  Keith. Krehbiel.  Constituency characteristics and legislative preferences , 1993 .

[34]  T. Holyoke,et al.  The power game , 1988 .

[35]  Rick K. Wilson,et al.  Partisan Voting Patterns in the U. S. Senate, 1877-1986 , 1989 .

[36]  Randall B. Ripley.  The Party Whip Organizations in the United States House of Representatives , 1964, American Political Science Review.

[37]  James T. Murphy.  Political Parties and the Porkbarrel: Party Conflict and Cooperation in House Public Works Committee Decision Making , 1974, American Political Science Review.

[38]  David S. Broder.  The Party's Over: The Failure of Politics in America , 1972 .

[39]  R. Peabody.  Party Leadership Change in the United States House of Representatives , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[40]  S. Patterson,et al.  Handbook of legislative research , 1985 .

[41]  B. Weingast,et al.  The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[42]  Keith Krehbiel,et al.  Information and legislative organization , 1991 .