Supplier development for sustainability: contextual barriers in global supply chains

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore contextual barriers to supplier development for sustainability (SDS) in global supply chains and managerial remedies to mitigate such barriers. Design/methodology/approach – A dyadic case study design was adopted with a Western European buyer and six of its Chinese suppliers. The database consists of 41 interviews and 81 documents. Findings – Contextual barriers to SDS in global supply chains derive from complexities in the sustainability concept, socio-economic differences, spatial and linguistic distance, as well as cultural differences between buyers and suppliers. Partial remedies include effective joint communications, an open organizational culture, and the fostering of cross-contextual understanding. Research limitations/implications – The findings contribute to theory development at the intersection of sustainable and global supply chain management research. They help to explain why scarce sustainability-related progress in global supply chains has...

[1]  D. Mollenkopf,et al.  Under the umbrella of sustainable supply chain management: emergent solutions to real-world problems , 2017 .

[2]  Constantin Blome,et al.  Conflict Minerals and Supply Chain Due Diligence: An Exploratory Study of Multi-tier Supply Chains , 2017 .

[3]  C. Busse.  Doing Well by Doing Good? The Self-interest of Buying Firms and Sustainable Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[4]  G. Markman,et al.  Organizational Hostility: Why and How Nonmarket Players Compete With Firms , 2016 .

[5]  Birgit Kopainsky,et al.  Food system resilience: Defining the concept , 2015 .

[6]  Andreas Eckhardt,et al.  The attitude cube - A three-dimensional model of situational factors in IS adoption and their impact on the attitude-behavior relationship , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Cristina Gimenez,et al.  Sustainable supplier development practices: Drivers and enablers in a global context , 2015 .

[8]  Shaz Ansari,et al.  What Is a "Fair" Price? Ethics as Sensemaking , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Mary J. Meixell,et al.  Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management , 2015 .

[10]  H. Walker,et al.  Theories in sustainable supply chain management: a structured literature review , 2015 .

[11]  S. Chung.  Explaining compliance: A multi-actor framework for understanding labour law compliance in China , 2015 .

[12]  Jennifer P. Green,et al.  Personality Strength and Situational Influences on Behavior , 2015 .

[13]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Drivers of supplier sustainability: : moving beyond compliance to commitment , 2015 .

[14]  Zaheer Khan,et al.  An investigation of the cross-border supplier development process : problems and implications in an emerging economy. , 2014 .

[15]  C. Busse.  Striving for appropriate forms of relevance through problem-driven research , 2014 .

[16]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  Supply Relational Risk: What Role Does Guanxi Play? , 2014 .

[17]  C. Redman.  Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits , 2014 .

[18]  M. Henke,et al.  Sustainability‐Related Supply Chain Risks: Conceptualization and Management , 2014 .

[19]  C. Grimm,et al.  The impact of cultural differences on buyer–supplier negotiations: An experimental study , 2014 .

[20]  A. Paulraj,et al.  Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance , 2014 .

[21]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have No Future , 2014 .

[22]  Srikanta Routroy,et al.  Evaluating the critical success factors of supplier development: a case study , 2013 .

[23]  Shiu‐Wan Hung,et al.  How does supplier's asset specificity affect product development performance? A relational exchange perspective , 2013 .

[24]  P. Jonsson,et al.  The value of sharing planning information in supply chains , 2013 .

[25]  Alexander E. Ellinger,et al.  Some ideas and guidance for prospective IJPDLM authors , 2013 .

[26]  Christian Busse,et al.  Toward a standardized supplier code of ethics: development of a design concept based on diffusion of innovation theory , 2013, Logist. Res..

[27]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Environmental Development of Emerging Economy Suppliers: Antecedents and Outcomes , 2013 .

[28]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Socially responsible supplier development: Construct development and measurement validation , 2012 .

[29]  R. Klassen,et al.  Social issues in supply chains: Capabilities link responsibility, risk (opportunity), and performance , 2012 .

[30]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Evaluating green supplier development programs at a telecommunications systems provider , 2012 .

[31]  S. Zailani,et al.  Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes , 2011 .

[32]  Laure Cabantous,et al.  Decision Theory as Practice: Crafting Rationality in Organizations , 2010 .

[33]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory , 2010 .

[34]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment—Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry , 2010 .

[35]  Shaohan Cai,et al.  Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust⋆ , 2010 .

[36]  R. Dalal,et al.  A Review and Synthesis of Situational Strength in the Organizational Sciences , 2010 .

[37]  E. Hartmann,et al.  SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2010 .

[38]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  SPECIAL TOPIC FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: INTRODUCTION AND REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF PURCHASING MANAGEMENT* , 2009 .

[39]  Jaepil Choi,et al.  Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance , 2009 .

[40]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Supplier development: communication approaches, activities and goals , 2009 .

[41]  Ki‐Hoon Lee,et al.  Current Status of CSR in the Realm of Supply Management: the Case of the Korean Electronics Industry , 2009 .

[42]  FOR THE LACK OF A BOILERPLATE : TIPS ON WRITING UP ( AND REVIEWING ) , 2009 .

[43]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[44]  J. Gerring,et al.  Options Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research : A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative , 2008 .

[45]  L. Araujo,et al.  Case research in purchasing and supply management: Opportunities and challenges , 2007 .

[46]  Sachin B. Modi,et al.  Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[47]  Subhash Sharma,et al.  National culture and industrial buyer-seller relationships in the United States and Latin America , 2006 .

[48]  Stephan M. Wagner.  Supplier development practices: an exploratory study , 2006 .

[49]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  DETERMINING WHEN MULTIPLE RESPONDENTS ARE NEEDED IN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: THE CASE OF PURCHASING AND OPERATIONS. , 2005 .

[50]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The performance implications of strategic fit of relational norm governance strategies in global supply chain relationships , 2005 .

[51]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[52]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Supplier evaluations: communication strategies to improve supplier performance , 2004 .

[53]  R. M. Monczka,et al.  Understanding integrated global sourcing , 2003 .

[54]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling , 2003 .

[55]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Language management in multinational companies , 2003 .

[56]  Zhonghua Qu,et al.  What will it take for China to become a competitive force in offshore outsourcing? An analysis of the role of transaction costs in supplier selection , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[58]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[59]  N. Asgary,et al.  Toward a Model for International Business Ethics , 2002 .

[60]  R. Sims,et al.  Leaders as Moral Role Models: The Case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers , 2002 .

[61]  Roger Calantone,et al.  A Structural Analysis of the Effectiveness of Buying Firms' Strategies to Improve Supplier Performance , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[62]  Charles G. Smith,et al.  Cross-Cultural Ethics and the Child Labor Problem , 1999 .

[63]  D. Levin,et al.  Umbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: a Life-Cycle Model , 1999 .

[64]  John Elkington,et al.  Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business , 1998 .

[65]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[66]  Ruth C. King,et al.  Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice , 1997 .

[67]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[68]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[69]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[70]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  Motivating and Monitoring JIT Supplier Performance , 1990 .

[71]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[72]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[73]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[74]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[75]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .