Interaction and Innovation across Different Sectors: Findings from Norwegian City-Regions

Fitjar R. D. and Rodríguez-Pose A. Interaction and innovation across different sectors: findings from Norwegian city-regions, Regional Studies. This article examines how different types of interaction are related to the capacity of firms to innovate in different sectors. Using a sample of 1604 Norwegian firms with more than ten employees, it analyses how interactions within the business group, with industry partners, and with research institutions and consultancies impinge on the probability of innovation for firms in six different economic sectors – manufacturing; construction; retail; accommodation and food; transport; and professional and business services – and six sector-by-skill categories – high- and low-skilled manufacturing, construction, and services. The results of ordinal regression analyses for product and process innovation show that the drivers of innovation differ widely across sectors. While exchanges internal to the firm tend to be disconnected from innovation across the board, those with scientific and industrial partners prove to be important drivers of innovation not only for firms in sectors, such as manufacturing, traditionally deemed to benefit from these partnerships, but also for sectors regarded as less innovative, such as construction. This pattern even holds for low-skilled firms in the manufacturing and construction sectors.

[1]  Staffan Laestadius,et al.  Technology Level, Knowledge Formation, and Industrial Competence in Paper Manufacturing , 1998 .

[2]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Evolution in Economic Geography: Institutions, Political Economy, and Adaptation , 2009 .

[3]  Richard Williams.  Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables , 2006 .

[4]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[5]  G. Bender.  Innovation in Low-tech , 2004 .

[6]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[7]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in services , 1997 .

[8]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Services Innovation: Competere in una nuova era , 2011 .

[9]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era , 2010 .

[10]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .

[11]  Luc Soete,et al.  Internationalization of services: A technological perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Learning and Industrial Competitiveness , 1995 .

[13]  Richard Shearmur,et al.  Collaboration, information and the geography of innovation in knowledge intensive business services , 2012 .

[14]  D. Gann,et al.  Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK , 2005 .

[15]  D. Keeble,et al.  University–business interaction in the Oxford and Cambridge regions , 2001 .

[16]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[17]  Heidi Wiig Aslesen,et al.  New perspectives on knowledge‐intensive services and innovation , 2007 .

[18]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Innovation In “Low-Tech” Industries , 2006 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[20]  H. Smith.  Universities, Innovation, and Territorial Development: A Review of the Evidence , 2007 .

[21]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[22]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy , 2007 .

[23]  Paul Foley,et al.  PRODUCTION SITE R&D IN A MATURE INDUSTRIAL REGION , 1996 .

[24]  Anne Smith,et al.  Improving Survey Response Rates from Chief Executive Officers in Small Firms: The Importance of Social Networks , 2006 .

[25]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[26]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[27]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  In Economics and Social Sciences Working Papers Series Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway Firm Collaboration and Modes of Innovation in Norway , 2022 .

[28]  Barry Moore,et al.  Collective Learning Processes, Networking and 'Institutional Thickness' in the Cambridge Region , 1999 .

[29]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster , 2008 .

[30]  B. Dalum.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[31]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[32]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The changing role of science in the innovation process: From Queen to Cinderella? , 2009 .

[33]  M. Storper,et al.  The Increasing Importance of Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Production: An Analysis of US Patent Citations, 1975–1997 , 2008 .

[34]  L. Leydesdorff.  The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[35]  Simone Strambach,et al.  Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) as drivers of multilevel knowledge dynamics , 2008, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[36]  S. Iammarino,et al.  MNCs, Technological Innovation and Regional Systems in the EU: Some Evidence in the Italian Case , 1998 .

[37]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[38]  W. Rupert Maclaurin,et al.  The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and Its Relation to Economic Growth , 1953 .

[39]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society , 2013 .

[40]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[41]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[42]  F. Castellacci.  Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation , 2008 .

[43]  B. Tether.  Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey , 2005 .

[44]  Brooks C. Holtom,et al.  Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research , 2008 .

[45]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Sectoral Systems: How and Why Innovation Differs across Sectors , 2006 .

[46]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[47]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .