Hyperspectral Image Classification Based on Extended Morphological Attribute Profiles and Abundance Information

Due to the high dimensionality of hyperspectral data and the present of mixed pixels in the image, classification is a challenging task in hyperspectral image applications. In this paper, a strategy for hyperspectral image classification was presented, where the spectral-spatial features and abundance information of hyperspectral image were extracted and provided as input to the sparse multinomial logistic regression classifier. The mathematical morphology method was used to extract the extended multi-attribute profiles (EMAPs), and the class-based end member extraction and sparse unmixing method was used to obtain the abundance information for each class. The experiments were conducted on the well-known Indian Pines dataset. Results indicated that the extended multi-attribute profiles and abundance information significantly improved the classification performance. Compared with the overall accuracy 80.46% of classification using original spectral bands, the overall accuracy using extended multi-attribute profiles and abundance information reached 94.27% and 88.75%, respectively.

[1]  Jun Li,et al.  Advanced Spectral Classifiers for Hyperspectral Images: A review , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine.

[2]  Shutao Li,et al.  From Subpixel to Superpixel: A Novel Fusion Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images by Using Extended Morphological Attribute Profiles and Independent Component Analysis , 2011, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[4]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Extended profiles with morphological attribute filters for the analysis of hyperspectral data , 2010 .

[5]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Morphological Attribute Profiles for the Analysis of Very High Resolution Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Alternating direction algorithms for constrained sparse regression: Application to hyperspectral unmixing , 2010, 2010 2nd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[8]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Downscaling Sentinel-2 Imagery for Land Use and Land Cover Classification by Spectral-Spatial Features , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Jun Li,et al.  Recent Advances on Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification: An Overview and New Guidelines , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Naoto Yokoya,et al.  Random Forest Ensembles and Extended Multiextinction Profiles for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Automatic Framework for Spectral–Spatial Classification Based on Supervised Feature Extraction and Morphological Attribute Profiles , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[12]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[13]  J. Benediktsson,et al.  Remotely Sensed Image Classification Using Sparse Representations of Morphological Attribute Profiles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.