Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words

Abstract Boundary-related lengthening has been shown to affect the phrase-final word in a number of languages, but its precise distribution within the final word has not been determined. Some evidence suggests that it can begin before the final syllable (e.g. in an earlier main-stress syllable), and that it may be progressive (e.g. may affect the coda of the final syllable more than the nucleus and the nucleus more than the onset). However, only a small number of word shapes have been examined in any one language, so the available facts under-determine models of the duration adjustment process. A survey of final lengthening in words with various stress patterns in American English, using acoustic measures, shows that, in the conditions of these experiments, (a) although most of the duration increase occurs in the phrase-final syllable rime, statistically significant lengthening of 7–18% also occurs in the main-stress syllable rime, when the main stress syllable is not the final syllable, (b) this pattern is seen in both pitch-accented and unaccented final words, suggesting that it is not the result of nuclear-accent-related lengthening, (c) the distribution of lengthening across the syllables of the final word is not straightforward, in the sense that regions between the main-stress rime and the final rime appear to be skipped or lengthened less than the regions before and after them. These results suggest that the mechanism of boundary-related lengthening is more complex than current models propose; in particular, its distribution cannot be explained without reference to the location of main lexical stress and appears to involve more than one stretch of speech, at least in American English.

[1]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[2]  D. Scott,et al.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Dani Byrd,et al.  The elastic phrase: modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[4]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[5]  Stefan Sudhoff,et al.  Methods in empirical prosody research , 2006 .

[6]  Laurence White,et al.  English speech timing : a domain and locus approach , 2002 .

[7]  Jan Edwards,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Lengthenings and shortenings and the nature of prosodic constituency , 1990 .

[8]  K. J. Kohler Prosodic Boundary Signals in German , 1983 .

[9]  C. Gussenhoven,et al.  Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch , 1995 .

[10]  G. M. Cambier-Langeveld The Domain of Final Lengthening in the Production of Dutch , 1997 .

[11]  Richard Berkovits,et al.  Utterance final lengthening and the duration of final-stop closures , 1993 .

[12]  Lennart Nord,et al.  Stress patterns and rhythm in the reading of proseand poetry with analogies to music performance , 1991 .

[13]  E. Pulgram Syllable, word, nexus, cursus , 1970 .

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method , 1995, BMJ.

[15]  Jason Adams,et al.  Interacting effects of syllable and phrase position on consonant articulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R Berkovits,et al.  Progressive Utterance-Final Lengthening in Syllables with Final Fricatives , 1993, Language and speech.

[17]  Colin W. Wightman,et al.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Stephen Isard,et al.  Segment durations in a syllable frame , 1991 .

[19]  Mattias Heldner,et al.  Prosodic boundary strength in Swedish: final lengthening and silent interval duration , 1995 .

[20]  Alice Turk,et al.  Acoustic segment durations in prosodic research: a practical guide , 2006 .

[21]  R Berkovits,et al.  Durational Effects in Final Lengthening, Gapping, and Contrastive Stress , 1994, Language and speech.

[22]  G. M. Cambier Langeveld,et al.  Temporal Marking of Accents and Boundaries , 2000 .

[23]  Sungbok Lee,et al.  How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Kim E. A. Silverman Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The separation of prosodies: comments on Kohler's paper , 1990 .

[25]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  D. Klatt Vowel Lengthening is Syntactically Determined in a Connected Discourse. , 1975 .

[27]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .