A comparison between UWB and GPS devices in the measurement of external load and collective tactical behaviour variables during a professional official match

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to compare the agreement of the data on the kinematic demands and collective tactical variables during a professional soccer match between GPS and UWB sensors. The data were extracted from a professional soccer match played in “the regular season” during 2019-2020. The analysis indicated a high-degree of agreement between UWB and GPS sensors to measure the total distance covered (ICC>0.94). In addition, Bland-Altman plots showed a low average difference for the total distance covered between the devices (mean difference = -0.011 to -0.017 m). Although the collective tactical variable (i.e. surface area) showed a high-degree of agreement between both devices (i.e. ICC>0.84), a significant main effect was found for the average difference between the UWB sensor and GPS sensor (mean difference = -9.25 to 57.41 m2). In addition, Bland-Altman plots showed a slight systematic bias for lower surface area measured by the GPS sensor in comparison to the UWB sensor. Researchers and technical staff should consider that the data provided by the GPS and UWB can be interchangeable in the analysed kinematic variables. However, the data provided by the devices cannot be compared in the analysed collective variables due to the differences found.

[1]  A. Díaz,et al.  Demandas tácticas de juegos reducidos en fútbol: influencia de la tecnología utilizada , 2019 .

[2]  Carlos D Gómez-Carmona,et al.  Comparing accuracy between global positioning systems and ultra-wideband-based position tracking systems used for tactical analyses in soccer , 2019, European journal of sport science.

[3]  P. Parlebas Elementary Mathematical Modelization of Games and Sports , 2002 .

[4]  Ernesto De la Cruz Sánchez,et al.  Accuracy, intra- and inter-unit reliability, and comparison between GPS and UWB-based position-tracking systems used for time-motion analyses in soccer. , 2018 .

[5]  Hend Suliman Al-Khalifa,et al.  Ultra Wideband Indoor Positioning Technologies: Analysis and Recent Advances † , 2016, Sensors.

[6]  W. Helsen,et al.  Relationships Between Training Load Indicators and Training Outcomes in Professional Soccer , 2017, Sports Medicine.

[7]  Martin Lames,et al.  Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions , 2018, PloS one.

[8]  Alejandro Muñoz-López,et al.  The validity and reliability of a 5-hz gps device for quantifying athletes’ sprints and movement demands specific to team sports , 2017 .

[9]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Wearables for Integrative Performance and Tactic Analyses: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions , 2019, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[10]  Doungkamol Sindhusake,et al.  GPS and Injury Prevention in Professional Soccer , 2016, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[11]  Sergio José Ibáñez,et al.  Accuracy and Inter-Unit Reliability of Ultra-Wide-Band Tracking System in Indoor Exercise , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[12]  Peter Peeling,et al.  Comparing Global Positioning System and Global Navigation Satellite System Measures of Team-Sport Movements. , 2018, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[13]  R. Eston,et al.  The effects of fatigue on the running profile of elite team sport athletes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness.

[14]  Tomás García-Calvo,et al.  A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: Agreement between systems , 2019, PloS one.

[15]  Keith Davids,et al.  Team Synergies in Sport: Theory and Measures , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Jos Vanrenterghem,et al.  The Relationship Between Whole-Body External Loading and Body-Worn Accelerometry During Team-Sport Movements. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[17]  Franco M. Impellizzeri,et al.  Physiology of Small-Sided Games Training in Football , 2011, Sports medicine.

[18]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  A Systematic Review of Collective Tactical Behaviours in Football Using Positional Data , 2019, Sports Medicine.

[19]  Jos J de Koning,et al.  Monitoring Training Loads: The Past, the Present, and the Future. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[20]  Grant Trewartha,et al.  Monitoring What Matters: A Systematic Process for Selecting Training-Load Measures. , 2017, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[21]  Matthias Gilgien,et al.  Validity of the Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Team Sports Specific Drills, in Indoor Conditions , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[22]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal Chiropractic Medicine.

[23]  Wouter Frencken,et al.  Oscillations of centroid position and surface area of soccer teams in small-sided games , 2011 .

[24]  Tim J Gabbett,et al.  Accelerometer and GPS-Derived Running Loads and Injury Risk in Elite Australian Footballers , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.