On-the-Fly Learning and Sampling of Ligand Binding by High-Throughput Molecular Simulations.

High-throughput molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are a computational method consisting of using multiple short trajectories, instead of few long ones, to cover slow biological time scales. Compared to long trajectories this method offers the possibility to start the simulations in successive batches, building a knowledgeable model of the available data to inform subsequent new simulations iteratively. Here, we demonstrate an automatic, iterative, on-the-fly method for learning and sampling molecular simulations in the context of ligand binding for the case of trypsin-benzamidine binding. The method uses Markov state models to learn a simplified model of the simulations and decide where best to sample from, achieving a converged binding affinity in approximately one microsecond, 1 order of magnitude faster than classical sampling. This method demonstrates for the first time the potential of adaptive sampling schemes in the case of ligand binding.

[1]  Anton Arkhipov,et al.  Architecture and Membrane Interactions of the EGF Receptor , 2013, Cell.

[2]  G. de Fabritiis,et al.  Complete reconstruction of an enzyme-inhibitor binding process by molecular dynamics simulations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Improvements in Markov State Model Construction Reveal Many Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of NTL9. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[4]  M J Harvey,et al.  ACEMD: Accelerating Biomolecular Dynamics in the Microsecond Time Scale. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  V. Pande,et al.  Rapid equilibrium sampling initiated from nonequilibrium data , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  A Caflisch,et al.  Identification of the protein folding transition state from molecular dynamics trajectories. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  V. Pande,et al.  Calculation of the distribution of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  Copernicus: A new paradigm for parallel adaptive molecular dynamics , 2011, 2011 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC).

[9]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[10]  Ron O. Dror,et al.  Mechanism of Voltage Gating in Potassium Channels , 2012, Science.

[11]  I. Kevrekidis,et al.  Coarse master equation from Bayesian analysis of replica molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Frank Noé,et al.  Kinetic characterization of the critical step in HIV-1 protease maturation , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Screen Savers of the World Unite! , 2000, Science.

[14]  Amedeo Caflisch,et al.  Free Energy Guided Sampling. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  Daniel-Adriano Silva,et al.  A Role for Both Conformational Selection and Induced Fit in Ligand Binding by the LAO Protein , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Adaptive Seeding: A New Method for Simulating Biologically Relevant Timescales , 2009 .

[17]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[18]  F. Noé,et al.  Transition networks for modeling the kinetics of conformational change in macromolecules. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[19]  I. Kevrekidis,et al.  Coarse molecular dynamics of a peptide fragment: Free energy, kinetics, and long-time dynamics computations , 2002, physics/0212108.

[20]  P. Deuflhard,et al.  A Direct Approach to Conformational Dynamics Based on Hybrid Monte Carlo , 1999 .

[21]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Using path sampling to build better Markovian state models: predicting the folding rate and mechanism of a tryptophan zipper beta hairpin. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[22]  P. Deuflhard,et al.  Robust Perron cluster analysis in conformation dynamics , 2005 .

[23]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[24]  David P. Anderson,et al.  High-Throughput All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Distributed Computing , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[25]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Building Markov state models along pathways to determine free energies and rates of transitions. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  Jeffrey K Weber,et al.  Characterization and rapid sampling of protein folding Markov state model topologies. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  V. Pande,et al.  Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  E. Shaw,et al.  STUDIES ON THE ACTIVE CENTER OF TRYPSIN. THE BINDING OF AMIDINES AND GUANIDINES AS MODELS OF THE SUBSTRATE SIDE CHAIN. , 1965, The Journal of biological chemistry.