Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, U.K. and Irish Companies

Innovation in small firms is important both because of its direct contribution to the competitiveness of those companies but also because of the potential for the small firm sector to act as the initiator, catalyst and medium for wider technical change. In this paper data from the Product Development Survey, a new international survey of firms' product innovation activity and strategy, is used to examine the relationship between product innovation and growth in German, Irish and U.K. small firms. In each country the output of innovative small firms was found to grow significantly faster than that of non-innovators. In Germany, output growth was achieved by a product innovation strategy which sharply increased productivity but reduced employment. U.K. and Irish small firms adopted a more balanced approach with increases in both employment and productivity associated with innovative behaviour. Comparison of the organisation of product innovation indicated that German small firms adopted a less market-oriented, less risky, and more formally organised approach than their U.K. and Irish counterparts. The revealed characteristics of U.K. and Irish small firms suggested that they may be the most effective initiators and catalysts for wider technological change. The larger proportion of German small firms which were innovating, however, suggested that the German small firm sector may be the more effective technology transfer medium.

[1]  G. Reid The state of British enterprise: Growth, innovation and competitive advantage in small and medium sized firms: Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge, (Small Business Research Centre, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9DE, 1992) p. 87 , 1993 .

[2]  M. Best,et al.  The new competition : institutions of industrial restructuring , 1991 .

[3]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  Innovation and the small and medium sized firm: their role in employment and in economic change , 1981 .

[4]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[5]  R. Oakey,et al.  High Technology Small Firms , 1984 .

[6]  S. Birley,et al.  Growth and performance contrasts between ‘types’ of small firms , 1990 .

[7]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  Characteristics distinguishing high-growth ventures , 1993 .

[8]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the black box , 1983 .

[9]  D. Storey Understanding the small business sector , 1994 .

[10]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[11]  A. Kalleberg,et al.  Gender and Organizational Performance: Determinants of Small Business Survival and Success , 1991 .

[12]  David Valler Barkham, R., Gudgin, G., Hart, M. and Hanvey, E., "The Determinants of Small Firm Growth: An Inter-regional Study in the UK 1986-90" (Book Review) , 1997 .

[13]  M. Best,et al.  The new competition , 1990 .

[14]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement , 1993 .

[15]  P. Westhead Survival and Employment Growth Contrasts between Types of Owner-Managed High-Technology Firms , 1995 .

[16]  M. O’Mahony Productivity Levels in British and German Manufacturing Industry , 1992, National Institute Economic Review.