Clusters of science and health related Twitter users become more isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic

COVID-19 represents the most severe global crisis to date whose public conversation can be studied in real time. To do so, we use a data set of over 350 million tweets and retweets posted by over 26 million English speaking Twitter users from January 13 to June 7, 2020. We characterize the retweet network to identify spontaneous clustering of users and the evolution of their interaction over time in relation to the pandemic’s emergence. We identify several stable clusters (super-communities), and are able to link them to international groups mainly involved in science and health topics, national elites, and political actors. The science- and health-related super-community received disproportionate attention early on during the pandemic, and was leading the discussion at the time. However, as the pandemic unfolded, the attention shifted towards both national elites and political actors, paralleled by the introduction of country-specific containment measures and the growing politicization of the debate. Scientific super-community remained present in the discussion, but experienced less reach and became more isolated within the network. Overall, the emerging network communities are characterized by an increased self-amplification and polarization. This makes it generally harder for information from international health organizations or scientific authorities to directly reach a broad audience through Twitter for prolonged time. These results may have implications for information dissemination along the unfolding of long-term events like epidemic diseases on a world-wide scale.

[1]  Loni Hagen,et al.  Crisis Communications in the Age of Social Media , 2018 .

[2]  M. Leonard,et al.  The human factor: the critical importance of effective teamwork and communication in providing safe care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[3]  Stefano Ceri,et al.  Topology comparison of Twitter diffusion networks reliably reveals disinformation news , 2019, ArXiv.

[4]  B. Rimé,et al.  Collective Emotions and Social Resilience in the Digital Traces After a Terrorist Attack , 2018, Psychological science.

[5]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[6]  Dieter Pfoser,et al.  Zika in Twitter: Temporal Variations of Locations, Actors, and Concepts , 2017, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[7]  David Lazer,et al.  Sustained Online Amplification of COVID-19 Elites in the United States , 2020, Social Media + Society.

[8]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  The State-of-the-Art in Twitter Sentiment Analysis , 2018, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Jacomy,et al.  ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  B. Tadić,et al.  Networks and emotion-driven user communities at popular blogs , 2010 .

[13]  Barbara Poblete,et al.  Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? , 2010, SOMA '10.

[14]  A. L. Schmidt,et al.  The COVID-19 social media infodemic , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Twitter adoption and use in mass convergence and emergency events , 2009 .

[16]  María Martínez-Rojas,et al.  Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Giovanni Colavizza,et al.  Experts and authorities receive disproportionate attention on Twitter during the COVID-19 crisis , 2020, ArXiv.

[18]  Azzam Mourad,et al.  Critical Impact of Social Networks Infodemic on Defeating Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic: Twitter-Based Study and Research Directions , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management.

[19]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change , 2015 .

[20]  Shahbaz Syed,et al.  The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, CJEM.

[21]  Hernán A. Makse,et al.  CUNY Academic Works , 2022 .

[22]  Alessandro Flammini,et al.  Social Influence and Unfollowing Accelerate the Emergence of Echo Chambers , 2019 .

[23]  Teresa Foo,et al.  : SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW , 2004 .

[24]  Christian Staudt,et al.  Engineering Parallel Algorithms for Community Detection in Massive Networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[25]  Leonardo Neves,et al.  TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification , 2020, FINDINGS.

[26]  Wasim Ahmed,et al.  COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data , 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research.

[27]  Martin Mueller,et al.  Crowdbreaks: Tracking Health Trends Using Public Social Media Data and Crowdsourcing , 2018, Front. Public Health.

[28]  H. Rao,et al.  Twitter as a Rapid Response News Service: An Exploration in the Context of the 2008 China Earthquake , 2010, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[29]  Sejin Park,et al.  The role of social media in local government crisis communications , 2015 .

[30]  Richard Pebody,et al.  The added value of online user-generated content in traditional methods for influenza surveillance , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Rui Chen,et al.  Coordination in emergency response management , 2008, CACM.

[32]  D. Plenz,et al.  powerlaw: A Python Package for Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Distributions , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  Christian Reuter,et al.  Retrospective Review and Future Directions for Crisis Informatics , 2021, Information Refinement Technologies for Crisis Informatics.

[34]  Jisun An,et al.  High correlation of Middle East respiratory syndrome spread with Google search and Twitter trends in Korea , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[35]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[36]  J. Brownstein,et al.  Influenza A (H7N9) and the importance of digital epidemiology. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[38]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  The spreading of misinformation online , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Igor Mozetič,et al.  Stance and influence of Twitter users regarding the Brexit referendum , 2017, Computational social networks.

[40]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[41]  Mathieu Bastian,et al.  Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks , 2009, ICWSM.

[42]  Steven E Wheeler,et al.  Local nature of substituent effects in stacking interactions. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[43]  Igor Mozetic,et al.  Retweet networks of the European Parliament: evaluation of the community structure , 2016, Applied Network Science.

[44]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[45]  A. Arvidsson,et al.  Echo Chamber or Public Sphere? Predicting Political Orientation and Measuring Political Homophily in Twitter Using Big Data , 2014 .