The Effect of New Legislation on the Disclosure of Performance Indicators: The Case of Spanish Local Governments

This article analyzes the effect of new accounting legislation on the disclosure of performance indicators in the financial statements of Spanish local governments. Based on agency and institutional theories, the article also assesses whether the disclosure of performance indicators is used to make the monitoring of local government performance easier for stakeholders or merely to project an image of good management. The results show that the enactment of new legislation has only led to a partial implementation, most local governments disclosing financial and budgetary indicators but very few providing indicators related to the performance of public services. The institutional theory (symbolic value) seems to be the rationale that best explains this pattern of disclosure.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  Fabrizio Panozzo.  Management by decree. Paradoxes in the reform of the Italian public sector , 2000 .

[3]  L. Torres.  Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries , 2004 .

[4]  Vicente Pina,et al.  Are ICTs promoting government accountability?: A comparative analysis of e-governance developments in 19 OECD countries , 2007 .

[5]  심계순.  Performance-Based Accountability , 2011 .

[6]  Wouter Van Dooren,et al.  What Makes Organisations Measure? Hypotheses on the Causes and Conditions for Performance Measurement , 2005 .

[7]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information? , 2010 .

[8]  Zsuzsanna Lonti,et al.  Accountability or Countability? Performance Measurement in the New Zealand Public Service, 1992–2002 , 2007 .

[9]  L. Torres,et al.  Performance Measurement in Spanish Local Governments. An Empirical Study about the State of the Art , 2010 .

[10]  A. Neale,et al.  Performance reporting for accountability purposes:: Lessons, issues, future , 2000 .

[11]  Xiaohu Wang,et al.  Assessing Administrative Accountability , 2002 .

[12]  E. Jansen,et al.  New Public Management: Perspectives on Performance and the Use of Performance Information , 2008 .

[13]  David Clark,et al.  Open government in Britain: Discourse and practice , 1996 .

[14]  T. J. Brignall,et al.  An Institutional Perspective on Performance Measurement and Management in the 'New Public Sector' , 2000 .

[15]  Vicente Pina,et al.  Publicprivate partnership and private finance initiatives in the EU and Spanish local governments , 2001 .

[16]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[17]  M. B. Sanger.  From Measurement to Management: Breaking through the Barriers to State and Local Performance , 2008 .

[18]  Janet Lee,et al.  Preparing Performance Information in the Public Sector: An Australian Perspective , 2008 .

[19]  A. Mora.  Propuesta de indicadores básicos de gestión de Servicios Públicos Locales , 2004 .

[20]  Jennifer Law,et al.  ACCOUNTABILITY AND LOCAL AUTHORITY ANNUAL REPORTS: THE CASE OF WELSH DISTRICT COUNCILS , 1991 .

[21]  George Kopits,et al.  Transparency in government operations , 1998 .

[22]  L. Torres,et al.  E-Governance Developments in European Union Cities: Reshaping Government’s Relationship with Citizens , 2006 .

[23]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  Jostein Askim.  How do politicians use performance information? An analysis of the Norwegian local government experience , 2007 .

[25]  G. Vinten.  Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[26]  Sabine Kuhlmann.  Performance Measurement in European local governments: a comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany , 2010 .

[27]  A. M. López Hernandez,et al.  Identifying barriers to the application of standardized performance indicators in local government , 2008 .

[28]  Noel Hyndman,et al.  The use of performance information in external reporting: An empirical study of UK executive agencies , 1995 .

[29]  Joining public accountability and performance management: A case study of Lethbridge, Alberta , 2011 .

[30]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  Jeannette Taylor.  The usefulness of key performance indicators to public accountability authorities in East Asia , 2007 .

[32]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Publishing public performance results on the Internet: Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account? , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  C. Hood.  The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme , 1995 .

[34]  S. Taylor,et al.  Bureaucratic Expertise versus Legislative Authority: A Model of Deception and Monitoring in Budgeting , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[35]  Manuel Pedro Rodríguez Bolívar,et al.  e-Government process and incentives for online public financial information , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[36]  Robert W. Scapens,et al.  Institutional Theories and Management Accounting Change: Contributions, Issues and Paths for Development , 2006 .

[37]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government , 2004 .

[38]  Jerold L. Zimmerman,et al.  MUNICIPAL ACCOUNTING MAZE - ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL INCENTIVES , 1977 .

[39]  C. Hood.  THE “ NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT ” IN THE 1980 s : VARIATIONS ON A THEME , 2003 .

[40]  J. L. Chan.  Government Accounting: An Assessment of Theory, Purposes and Standards , 2003 .

[41]  L. Torres,et al.  Reshaping Public Administration: The Spanish Experience Compared to the UK , 2004 .

[42]  NON-PROFIT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR , 2008 .

[43]  I. Steccolini.  Is the Annual Report an Accountability Medium? An Empirical Investigation into Italian Local Governments , 2004 .

[44]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality , 1984 .

[45]  Theodore H. Poister,et al.  Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice , 1999 .

[46]  Carlos Serrano-Cinca,et al.  Factors Influencing E-Disclosure in Local Public Administrations , 2009 .

[47]  Sven Siverbo,et al.  Relative Performance Evaluation in Swedish Local Government , 2006 .

[48]  William C. Rivenbark,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of Performance Data to Improve Municipal Services: Evidence from the North Carolina Benchmarking Project , 2008 .

[49]  Christopher Pollitt,et al.  Performance Information for Democracy , 2006 .

[50]  Wayne Cameron,et al.  Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics , 2004 .

[51]  Anthony Wall,et al.  The disclosure of key performance indicators in the public sector , 2003 .