Knowledge-based systems as decision support tools in an ecosystem approach to fisheries: Comparing a fuzzy-logic and a rule-based approach

Abstract In an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF), management must draw on information of widely different types, and information addressing various scales. Knowledge-based systems assist in the decision-making process by summarising this information in a logical, transparent and reproducible way. Both rule-based Boolean and fuzzy-logic models have been used successfully as knowledge-based decision support tools. This study compares two such systems relevant to fisheries management in an EAF developed for the southern Benguela. The first is a rule-based system for the prediction of anchovy recruitment and the second is a fuzzy-logic tool to monitor implementation of an EAF in the sardine fishery. We construct a fuzzy-logic counterpart to the rule-based model, and a rule-based counterpart to the fuzzy-logic model, compare their results, and include feedback from potential users of these two decision support tools in our evaluation of the two approaches. With respect to the model objectives, no method clearly outperformed the other. The advantages of numerically processing continuous variables, and interpreting the final output, as in fuzzy-logic models, can be weighed up against the advantages of using a few, qualitative, easy-to-understand categories as in rule-based models. The natural language used in rule-based implementations is easily understood by, and communicated among, users of these systems. Users unfamiliar with fuzzy-set theory must “trust” the logic of the model. Graphical visualization of intermediate and end results is an important advantage of any system. Applying the two approaches in parallel improved our understanding of the model as well as of the underlying problems. Even for complex problems, small knowledge-based systems such as the ones explored here are worth developing and using. Their strengths lie in (i) synthesis of the problem in a logical and transparent framework, (ii) helping scientists to deliberate how to apply their science to transdisciplinary issues that are not purely scientific, and (iii) representing vehicles for delivering state-of-the-art science to those who need to use it. Possible applications of this approach for ecosystems of the Humboldt Current are discussed.

[1]  Steven Mackinson,et al.  An adaptive fuzzy expert system for predicting structure, dynamics and distribution of herring shoals , 2000 .

[2]  Astrid Jarre,et al.  A fuzzy-logic tool for multi-criteria decision making in fisheries: the case of the South African pelagic fishery , 2007 .

[3]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Mathematical Models in Biological Oceanography. , 1984 .

[4]  A. M. Starfield,et al.  A rule-based ecological model for the management of an estuarine lake , 1989 .

[5]  A. Starfield.  A pragmatic approach to modeling for wildlife management , 1997 .

[6]  Miguel Ñiquen,et al.  Regime shifts in the Humboldt Current ecosystem , 2004 .

[7]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience , 2003, Fish and Fisheries Series.

[8]  G. Bianchi,et al.  The ecosystem approach to fisheries , 2008 .

[9]  Anthony M. Starfield,et al.  Qualitative, rule-based modeling , 1990 .

[10]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  GOUVERNe: new trends in decision support for groundwater governance issues , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Claude Roy,et al.  Worldwide large-scale fluctuations of sardine and anchovy populations , 1999 .

[12]  K. Cochrane,et al.  The potential use of predictions of recruitment success in the management of the South African anchovy resource , 1992 .

[13]  Karl K. Turekian,et al.  Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences , 2001 .

[14]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[15]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience: accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects , 2003 .

[16]  J. F. Caddy,et al.  An overview of recent global experience with recovery plans for depleted marine resources and suggested guidelines for recovery planning , 2004, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[17]  S. Neira,et al.  Comparing the Benguela and Humboldt marine upwelling ecosystems with indicators derived from inter-calibrated models , 2005 .

[18]  I. R. Noble.  The role of expert systems in vegetation science , 1987 .

[19]  Stephen T. Buckland,et al.  Are stock assessment methods too complicated , 2004 .

[20]  A. Jarre,et al.  Review of indicators in fisheries management – a development perspective , 2004 .

[21]  A. Jarre,et al.  Regime Shifts, Ecological Aspects , 2008 .

[22]  M. Burgman.  Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management: Experts, stakeholders and elicitation , 2005 .

[23]  Other.  Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems, 2007 , 2005 .

[24]  John Whittaker,et al.  Rules of Thumb , 1996 .

[25]  Lynne J. Shannon,et al.  Comparing trophic flows in the southern Benguela to those in other upwelling ecosystems , 1998 .

[26]  Astrid Jarre,et al.  Application of the sequential t-test algorithm for analysing regime shifts to the southern Benguela ecosystem , 2007 .

[27]  D. Pauly,et al.  Two approaches for modelling fish stock interactions in the Peruvian upwelling ecosystem , 1991 .

[28]  Chris Weaver,et al.  A fuzzy decision support tool for wildlife translocations into communal conservancies in Namibia , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Reimund P. Rötter,et al.  Integration of Systems Network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia , 2005, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  L. Shannon.  Benguela : predicting a large marine ecosystem , 2006 .

[31]  A. Jarre-Teichmann.  Steady-state modelling of the Peruvian upwelling ecosystem , 1992 .

[32]  William W. L. Cheung,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Expert System to Estimate Intrinsic Extinction Vulnerabilities of Marine Fishes to Fishing , 2004 .

[33]  J. G. Field,et al.  Forecasting in South African pelagic fisheries management: the use of expert and decision support systems , 1998 .

[34]  E Ferguson,et al.  From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. , 2006, Environment international.

[35]  J. G. Field,et al.  Predicting anchovy recruitment in the southern Benguela ecosystem: developing an expert system using classification trees : Starfield Festschrift , 2002 .

[36]  Lennart Bengtsson,et al.  Climate System Modelling , 1998 .

[37]  P. Cury,et al.  11 Developing a basis for detecting and predicting long-term ecosystem changes , 2006 .